Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
What's scummy about me wanting to clear up exactly how the claimed investigative immune worked?In post 18, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: Xigbar
Also, I really should have found out whether or not the game would reveal all alts at the end. Oh well.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Wait why are they a traitor as opposed to a full fledged scum member?In post 20, V Lexaeus wrote:
Yes, I understand what you mean.In post 17, XII Larxene wrote:Sounds like someone doesn't know what I'm claiming! If I was a Godfather a cop would get a town result on me~
And sure, if you want to say it in a totally confusing way. Immune to investigations, that's it. They just fail.
My point is, semantics aside, Cops are useless on you, just like on a GF, albeit somewhat less powerful.
How does that help a loyal member of the Organization? It doesn't.
Therefore, you're a traitor.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Are you voting me for some other reason than scumreading me?In post 18, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: Xigbar
Also, I really should have found out whether or not the game would reveal all alts at the end. Oh well.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
VOTE: Larxene
Strongest scumread as of now.
In post 14, XII Larxene wrote:They fail. Like a roleblock. What else would it mean?
These both, to my mind, feel like weird reactions to being prodded about the investigative immune claim. I would expect that town would understand that they would be questioned about the investigative immunity.In post 17, XII Larxene wrote:Sounds like someone doesn't know what I'm claiming! If I was a Godfather a cop would get a town result on me~
And sure, if you want to say it in a totally confusing way. Immune to investigations, that's it. They just fail.
Rather than be clear about things, she gets sort of defensive with the 'what else would it mean' and makes an odd comment about me saying it in a totally confusing way when immune isn't really a mafia term and ascetic is.
Even just the phrasing of 'I'm investigative immune, losers' is a little more aggressive than I would expect from such a claim from town and altogether I feel like they're defensive and overly aggressive in a scummy way.
Them not clarifying what investigative immune in their first post also feels somewhat off, and overall it felt like they were trying to push the game to just accept it and move on.
This is really weird. Are you essentially saying that you townread them for being excited? Because that's not a towntell and that feels like a lazy reason to townread someone. The immediate waffling about the townread feels bad too.In post 82, XII Larxene wrote:VOTE: Vexen
Let's see you actually do something, Vexi! <3
What's the point of even making this distinction? Why am I the towniest here, anyway?In post 39, IV Vexen wrote:
Larxene might not be obvi town but she is so far the most town player here. Dont get where the Luxord obvscum is coming fromIn post 37, II Xigbar wrote:VOTE: Roxas
Both posts felt played up. Larxene is definitely not obvtown, Luxord is definitely not obvscum.
This is your only post worth looking at and it doesn't say much.
Lexaeus is probably town. Or super excited scum, but I'd rather just call him town.
She townreads 10 for the votes (which I did, too, with the caveat that I townread him before the notes) but doesn't engage intellectually with it at all and just says they don't care about the content, which is another super lazy read.In post 83, XII Larxene wrote:Roxas votes are bleh, tbh. He's pretty town.
I was onboard with Luxord scum until I saw him copy his notes. I don't really care about the content but I don't see any scum there. The guy has an honest face~! I wanna see more once he gets a foothold.
Again, coming up with a townread and then immediately backs off on that townread by saying that she's now interested in what he has to say upon his return.In post 84, XII Larxene wrote:Actually I'll just elaborate. Vexen and Axel are the scummiest here right now, full stop. If Luxord's scum he doesn't know what the heck to do right out of the gate, and I'm extremely interested in what he has to say on his return. I'm not a very patient girl, either.
Why are Vexen and Axel the scummiest here, anyway? You said that you could vote Axel after a quote (and I do agree that post is somewhat scummy) but you've said nothing about Vexen this game. So, why?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I think that Roxas could be scum. I specifically note that I think that certain players would, as scum, make a play like that.In post 99, IV Vexen wrote:gotta get this game moving though. Its only page four and convo has pretty much died.
Xigbar what are your thoughts on Roxas and the way he came in
They could potentially be a godfather, or they could even be just normal scum counting on not getting checked or some other power role influencing the check.
I do not townread them based on their content: their willingness to declare people obvscum and obvtown is bad. Nullish bad though.
So all this is more to say that I don't townread them but they're not a strong scumread and I am very happy with my current vote and won't be changing it.
If everyone's going to lurk and not produce content, then they should sheep the person who is actually playing the game at any rate.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Do you not get the impression that, regardless of their alignment, that they are an audacious/defensive player?In post 108, VII Saix wrote:12 Larxene: Her claim is pro-town. A scum invest-immune doesn't gain much by claiming, at such early stages. On the other hand, it's a weak town role if any, so if she is a scum invest-immune, she had to be a really audacious/even defensive player to claim so early. Clubbed with this however are other things that make her a stronger townlean for me. She dislikes 4 Vex and clears 10 Lux for exactly the same points that I found valid in Vex's and Lux's behaviour. Suggests logic at work.
What reasoning did she really give that wasn't just reiterations of stuff that other people had said?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I think that the majority of experienced, competent scum players would make the claim because they'd know they would get towncred for it.In post 98, IV Vexen wrote:because usually scum arent going to come out the gate and say what kind of role they have and draw some major attention on themselves. Have a hard time imagining a scum player doin what you did right out of the gate.
I also think that a substantial amount of newb scum would just claim the invest because it seems like the 'town thing to do' without doing a proper analysis.
There's a lot of people in between that wouldn't, but I think that enough people would do it that in a metaless game I'm not going to write off the slot as town.
You shouldn't either.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I am open to a discussion by the way, Larxene. If you're town I would love to discuss your play so far this game. I'm not going to sit and tunnel you.
But everything that you've done so far, up to and including your last post with the in-character discredit and the weird comment about Saix, seems scum.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
This is a secret alt game and I'm not about to start ratting out alts left and right, regardless of the fact that I know who the mains of about half of the players.
I think thatyouwould make a play like that if you had some way to get towncred from that, especially in a secret alt game. I will say no more about that.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
What makes this a scum ploy is the fact that you're declaring one of my top scumread obvtown and my second highest townread obvscum.
I said earlier that I don't think that you should be written off as town for the play: I never said that you were scum or that you should immediately be voted.
I am, however, perfectly happy to vote you right now because I feel like you're working very hard towards a scum wincondition right now, regardless of your alignment.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
1) Larxene threw out a bunch of townreads then backed off on them in a scummy way. This isn't at all based on what should or should not have been done; waffling and having empty townreads is scummy.
2) Larxene's scumreads are very lazy and it feels like scum looking for easy positions. Your best argument to rebut it is that others have done the same thing too. That's scummy on both of your parts.
3) Yes, my issues with her tone require you to have some confidence in my ability to judge such things to be valid. You can write that off, but you cannot write the other things off.
VOTE: Roxas
I believe that he is scum defending Larxene and I think that Larxene will be quite difficult to lynch whereas Roxas will be much easier to lynch, so I am going to go after him first.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I will ask Heartless before I answer that question.In post 134, V Lexaeus wrote:Pretty much, yeah.
Without actually revealing the mains, who do you think you know?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
No, you disagreed with them since they didn't suit your agenda.This is false; I showed why.
I think that giving absolutely no reasons for your reads while sheeping general consensus on basically every single one of your reads is scummy.This is a misrep of my point. I specifically said that her lack of specifics was not in fact a scumtell. I then went on to note that were you to believe it was a scumtell, she isn't even the player most guilty of it. My point was thus that you were wrong in your fundamental premise and your focus on her having done something others were far more guilty of is ridiculous. Sure her "sinning" (it's not but let's humor you) wouldn't go away, but that's no excuse for having utterly ignored altogether all the other players guilty of the alleged sin.
I can name them if you'd like.
I cannot prove that because Mafia is the kind of game where virtually no one agrees on what's scummy, but I am sticking with that view of the game in the face of anything that you say against it.
I am visibly not following crowd consensus of any sort. My read on you developed independent of any slot in game and I jumped Larxene while they were universally townread. Saying I'm being 'easy' is disingenuous as hell.You are literally doing the exact same thing you are accusing Larxene of having done: taking the "easy" route. You are taking the "lazy" route. You are taking a position which is easy to take. Admitting you are doing so in public does not erase the sin of the hypocrisy in doing so while simultaneously pushing another for it.
It will be phenomenally difficult to lynch your scumpartners with you wallposting the rest of the game about how they're obvtown if you're scum.
It will be phenomenally difficult to lynch actual scum with you doing the same for the rest of the game about how obvtown the scum are if you're town.
I do not agree with any of your reads, I think that you're far more likely to be scum than not, and I think this is how we get from here to a town win regardless of your alignment.
You have shown no desire to engage with my reads, only to discredit them. You're either too confbiased to keep around or you're scum. I hope that you're the latter but I can live with the former.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
This is Roxas realizing that I'm not going to back down and that the only way to defend Larxene is to attempt to mislynch me.In post 139, XIII Roxas wrote:I take it back.
I do in fact have words.
Three, more specifically:
VOTE: II Xigbar.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
If you didn't want to be pushed as being scum hard defending scum then you shouldn't be hard defending scum as a player who refuses to bus.This is you, selling a narrative.
There is a fucking difference between pretending to have reads and trying to look town and simply not having reads at all while making no effort to fake looking town.And I think Larxene is not guilty of this whereas there are other players who actually are.
Larxene is fake as balls and has the most insincere reads in the game while actively trying to look like she's playing the game.
Some people, whom you have called obvscum, have not really attempted to engage with the game. That's not great but it happens and is FAR less scummy than what either you or Larxene have been doing this game.
My read on you has reasons that have existed since before I was voting you. There's a clear progression and clear reasons.In post 142, XIII Roxas wrote:Your read on me IS easy because it is the crowd consensus. You said it yourself explicitly: I am an easy lynch. Why would I be an easy lynch? Because people think I am scum. There is a great number of people who have gone "Roxas's contribution is not great, but I won't vote him because...". You are pursuing the easy path.
Larxene is also not a universal townread. Now granted I don't understand why she isn't, but there are multiple players who have explicitly stated she is not obvtown, and you are not even alone in stating she is suspicious. So even there, you are not taking a hard road. You are taking a road which is convenient.
I'm voting you because I think you're scum and an easier lynch than trying to get through Larxene with you spewing crap onto the thread.
If you fuck off and let me do my thing with Larxene I'll unvote you and go for the person I'm more sure is scum, but I'm not going to fight both of you simultaneously.
My points are fine, whether you're scum ignoring them for strategic reasons or town whose head is too far up their ass to engage them properly.I've made this clear already.
What's there to engage on?
Your points are shit.
I've explained why they are shit.
You would think that given that virtually every town game I've seen you in you've hard townread at least one scum, you would have learned something by now.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
No, this is really not town versus town.In post 143, VIII Axel wrote:No.
Roxas v Xigbar is townvtown. That being said, here's where scum really lies -
Vote: Saix- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Well Roxas is pissing me the fuck off but I think I know who he is and while that makes the opener even more scum indicative I don't necessarily know that he's scum here.
As if, I just don't want to get in the way of your valuable training. I care about your future, Roxas.Your premise is right.
Now prove it because you sure as fuck haven't.
VOTE: Larxene- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
You're going to need to give a lot of follow up on this read because it doesn't make much sense to me.In post 158, X Luxord wrote:Lexaeus sharing a townread on Vexen is obviously an insignificant thing to be reading, but it seems to me like such an inherently difficult stance to defend because of the inconsistency he admits to that I find it hard not to see as town. Basically in addition to earlier posts I'm working with a pretty comfortable sense he's town more than anyone else in the game.
This read is super waffly and goes both directions at once. It also doesn't really seem to add up to a townread to me except for a vague comment about the top of page six, and fmpov none of those were specifically towny to the point of overwriting what seems to be a scumread on my slot.In post 158, X Luxord wrote:105, in context, seems like a bit of a set-up for Xigbar, as scum to be making onto a Roxas push. Other posts from him I had a town impression, but I think the Larxene push doesn't make much sense either. Actually looking at Xigbar's series of posts at the top of page 6 makes me just think Xigbar is town.
This is really waffly and doesn't seem to come to a conclusion, and I'm not sure what Larxene echoing this has to do with anything.In post 158, X Luxord wrote:Saix's readslist: justifications for his reads are categorically bad. "Town is logical"/"scum is illogical" dichotomy just doesn't work. I'm hesitant to vote him, because the readlist just seems town. And I guess the conclusions of the list aren't necessarily that bad. (And I see now that both of these things have been echoed by Larxene.)
A lot of words to basically say 'well he OMGUSed so he's more likely town.'In post 158, X Luxord wrote:Saix: The reason the magnitude of my Axel read is small is because there isn't too much to say about it. There's no real justification. My thoughts on the matter are simply from experience and from what scum often tends to do when pushed early on in the game. And I just think an OMGUS comes from town in the early game more often. That's the only reason I have, and there's nothing else about Axel that tells me town.
I mean he waffled a lot in this post but for some reason this really, really gut pings me.In post 158, X Luxord wrote:Earlier, I did think that Axel's TvT dismissal was weird but nothing to write home about. I'm really thinking that it can go both ways, after reading Zexion's thoughts about Axel. So don't necessarily disagree there. Based on Axel's previous posts, it does sort of seem like Axel could just be expressing genuine townreads on Xigbar and Roxas though.
If I was to do pre-flip associatives or to have a flip on one or the other I would strongly suggest that this is scum talking about a scumbuddy.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Larx I think you're scum. If you do something that causes me to reevaluate I'll reevaluate: I'm not even close to tunnel mode at this point and if you're town I would like to work with you. But I do strongly feel that what I've seen from you is scum indicative, regardless of Roxas's feelings on the matter.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I mostly agree with Zexion's readslist, I mostly agree with what he says, I really like his scumreads and agree with his townreads. In spite of that, I've got a gut feeling that I shouldn't write the slot off as town entirely so I am not going to do so but I'm happy to work with you since our reads mostly align right now. What are your thoughts on Luxord, because I did townread the slot as well but his last post gave me really bad feelings and honestly the reasons that I had to townread him so far this game were comparatively lackluster so I think my reevaluation here should strongly outweigh.
I agree with Axel being scummy, for the record, but I've had the thought that he's super scummy but I'm concerned that he may just be scummy town. I don't know, like I would almost call them too scummy to be scum here. Not really someone that I'm interested in lynching Day 1 unless I get something that's more clearly scum and not just like bad.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I'm not saying she's hypocritical in that sense, I'm saying it's weird that she wants to hear more from her townreads and not her scumreads.
In both posts she anounced that she is interested to see more so where did you get the impression that this was new after "backing off" as you pointed? She always wanted to see more.In post 154, III Xaldin wrote:Hmmm
Xigbar why are you basing reads on meta on a secret alt game ? I find that disturbing.
Also your case on Larxene is pretty lucklaster.
Your reasons on her talks about Luxord were a blatant lie since in the first post you quoted
and then in the second you quotedLaxy wrote:I wanna see more once he gets a foothold.
[QUOTE="Laxy" I'm extremely interested in what he has to say on his return
Blatant lie is a rather strong phrasing to use and not to vote me or to immediately consider me scum: this post feels oddly like you're trying to tellmethat you scumread me and it feels scummy. What's disturbing of my use of meta in a secret alt game? Do you mean scummy or against the spirit of the game?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Confirmed Town: Xemnas, Xigbar
Strong Townread: Saix (144 feels super, super town)
Townread: Zexion (Logic says they should be locktown, gut says they might be scum, compromise)
Slight townread: Lexaeus, Vexen (Little content from Vexen but just minor townread, Lexaeus has stuff I like and dislike, they can go here for now.)
Null: Luxord, Marluxia (Brought luxord down because of bad feelings on a few things, though maybe he should still be higher? Marluxia has done little)
Scummy: Roxas, Axel (Roxas is as said before, kind of raising him a bit because meh. Axel is objectively awful so it's hard to put him higher, but maybe he doesn't belong here. I'll decide that later)
Scumfuckery: Xaldin, Larxene (Xaldin everything is bad. Larxene I've said a lot about.)
Demyx has done nothing so I have no read on them.
If you want to work with me, come vote up Xaldin?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Short answer: yes. I very strongly feel based on your opener to the game that you are scum trying to pocket me.In post 204, VI Zexion wrote:@Xigbar is 195/196 addressed to me? Don't understand what you mean by picking someone who you're scumreading to declare obvtown there.
Saix was never a townread: I was actually scumreading him and more particularly sort of scumreading you guys associatively so I put him as high town to see what you'd do.
That's not necessarily indicative: I wouldn't call you scum even if you literally just took the read from me. But it adds to the feeling.
Idk there was no phase of sorting me it felt like you were too quick to townread me for an opener that's stylistically what I'd be doing no matter what as a secret alt.
I don't really like your votes or some of your reads either.
If you're town I really really don't want this to be a game where we fight and/or you get mislynched: can we find a time to be on?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I had a guess from their second post and this confirmed it.In post 181, VI Zexion wrote:I'm fine with you feeling a little paranoid about my slot but I think that'll probably go away for you once you realize who I am / once I push a lynch on scum (basically no doubt left in my mind about who you are).- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
1) This is hugely misrepresenting what actually happened and the specific manner feels like scum trying to spin me as scummy.In post 321, IV Vexen wrote:Huh. Iso-ing Xig for a Xal case, and while the early stuff is still towny, the last few posts have been all kinds of meh. 307 particularly seems like... garbage. Like the whole concept...
"I lied about my reads so I could see what you'd do. And if you were town you could still do the exact same thing as I think you might have done as scum, because I'm afraid you're trying to pocket me."
The specific act of the quotation marks (specifically creating a narrative about what I was doing) is something bad scum do a lot to push scumreads, and is a huge scumtell.
2) I lied about a scumread to see how it would influence their read on the slot. It's a minor thing that has many potential reactions.
I think that that particular response is what they would do as scum. They also -might- do it as town. I think that there are other reactions that would clearly demarcate town or scum.
Quotes where you talk about your intent to think about things as opposed to actually thinking about things, on top of being LAMIST as fuck, are a huge scumtell.In post 322, IV Vexen wrote:Larxy and Lexy (who should really be masons with names like that) appear to have sheeped Xig. Whose reasoning amounted to not liking Xal's first three posts. Luxia, from context of 314-316 appears to be voting out of some weird concern for the deadline. Like, if Saix weren't making such wonderfully jiggly motions in response to my vote on him, I'd vote Luxia for those three. It's just so gross that it makes me want to stop eating for a couple of weeks. It's weird to me that a wagon so full of townreads can also look like such hot garbage. I'm probably gonna need to spend some serious time reevaluating that nest of crazy.
The answer to this is clearly visible in the game.In post 324, IV Vexen wrote:Hmm. At what approximate point in the game did you learn their identity. And vice versa.
I feel like if he were -that- concerned about this issue that he would have carefully looked for this answer himself.
Showy and played up declaration that he doesn't know what alignment Axel is. To put it in one word it would again be LAMIST but that doesn't go to the heart of why it's scummy.In post 320, IV Vexen wrote:As far as Axel's alignment goes, I haven't the foggiest. That's pretty much the reason I asked you why you were voting him in 306, which I'd still like you to respond to, btw. I just feel that your overconfidence, hypocrisy, and dismissal of literally every other player you have to read is probably scum. I'm adding the tu quoque, loaded question, and fact you ignored me until I suspected you to the list of reasons your role pm is red as well, btw.
He's making a point of declaring himself uninformed. Also, calling them in an overblown manner overconfident hypocritical and dismissive of literally every other player again feels scummy.
Also, that final sentence is out of place and something I've seen from scum a lot: after all, why would he be telling his scumreads about the additions to the reasons that he scumreads them?
I can't shake the feeling that this post comes from someone who knows who I am.In post 321, IV Vexen wrote:Like, I could understand this kind of paranoia from someone like mastina or thor on the outside, but there's 0 weight behind Xig's name here so there wouldn't be any reason to try to pocket him specifically.
I could understand the lying about reads if you thought it would catch scum, but here though it sounds like you know the result is gonna be mostly null.
No, I know the current reaction was null: if they challenged my read and they flipped scum I would super heavily townread them. Certain types of discomfort would indicate scum.
It's fairly clear what I was aiming for and you're calling me scummy for the act of lying about my reads, but what exactly is scum!Xigbar's scum motivation to do this?
I have so many fucking times made reference to my altguesses on different slots and this feels like you're trying to lock -no one knows anything- to help you push a narrative.In post 321, IV Vexen wrote:And that last line seems like a scum talking to someone they're afraid of catching them as town. Which ALSO doesn't make any sense, regardless of alignment, because there should be no way for Xig to know if Zex is good at catching them.
Seriously, wth was this?
So from my point of view you've either not read anything this game or are just scum trying to get an angle to push me off of.
Which is it?
Even this doesn't feel like an appropriate reaction. If he was so certain that no one could know anyone's names, he wouldn't so readily back down on it.In post 324, IV Vexen wrote:Hmm. At what approximate point in the game did you learn their identity. And vice versa.
This comes from scum the vast, vast majority of the time.In post 321, IV Vexen wrote:Seriously, wth was this?- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
TL;DR IV Vexen just feels overblown as all hell, and trying way too hard to show that they're thinking and stuff and it feels like scum.
I also can't shake the feeling that they're trying too hard with the 'no one knows who anyone is!' crap because they are in scumchat and know who a few people are, myself included.
I don't think anyone's first impression is that someone trying to pocket x specifically is a stature thing as opposed to just being friends, but that feels like what someone who knows me would say.
Those are bold words coming from you. Are you saying you'll volunteer to take care of it if things go wrong? Huh?In post 242, IX Demyx wrote:Oh yeah that much is obvious but what I'm thinking about is the way your reads were thrown out. Think as scum you'd put more thought into that side of things.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I didn't say you were. I just said that you might be. I'm sorry that my playstyle is manipulative but I like to see what people do. It's offended others before.In post 344, VI Zexion wrote:This game is a steaming pile of shit. Probably going to replace out.
If you are town Xigbar I have 0 respect for you in this game after that horseshit. I do nothing but engage with you an honest way and just because my reads align with yours and I'm willing to follow you on a read of yours that I don't understand I'm trying to pocket you??? And you were ~faking reads~ to try to ~bait me~? Fuck off dude. My reads are my own. Don't bring out of game stuff into the game to try to reveal anyone's identity, that's flagrantly in violation of the spirit of alted games. Your Vexen case is rubbish, you'll find scum in a nunnery with the way you're approaching the game.
Zero fucking clue how anyone has even a whisper of a townread on Axel here.
Sorry that I was wrong. I sincerely hope this didn't come from scum you but I think it's super, super unlikely and I'm willing to flat out trust you for this. Can we team up from here?
(Also, as you full well know I wasn't sincere with the Best Man comment and I was more trying to test his reaction, I don't understand why you're that upset about it? I don't see what exactly you think is out of game stuff to reveal people's identities. I agree that his reaction after the fact was pretty towny. I am going to be unvoting him as soon as I decide exactly where I would rather place my vote.)- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
This was a great vote and this is where my vote should go again I think.In post 346, III Xaldin wrote:Gotta love people just following xigbars no case on me and voting there, only for him to come and say that he is bsing reads, you know like I suspected he was doing when I called him out on his reads being fake.
Vote:Xigibar
Can we lynch traitors now.
This whole thing reeks of people now finally questioning him about his nothing stuff and he is trying to twist it into some I faked reads for weird reactions test for pocketing based on meta I thought I had.
Yea ok
VOTE: Xaldin- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Oh and I want to caveat: pretty towny was the wrong word. I could still easily see that slot being scum and I'm super wary of it. But I don't think it's nearly as likely to flip scum as other slots and I don't feel like fighting #6 on their townreads at this point in the game and would rather hope that the issue resolves itself later in the game.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Heh heh heh heh heh.
(That was, for the record, a deliberate lie.)- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Axel, to me, is fundamentally bad right now. He's bad in a way that could be scum and it's difficult to ascertain, he's bad in a way that it's hard to pin him down, and has a lot of scum motivation:
but I cannot with any degree of confidence assert that he's scum. On top of that, my reads on the scumteam as a whole are starting to shape up and the Xaldin/Saix connection is pretty strong and I want to go that way.
He's not a slot I have any problems seeing wind up dead but I don't expect to have a long lifespan in this game regardless of anonymity and I would like to pursue something more dangerous than what is fundamentally, in my opinion, a lynch that I cannot be sure of due to the complete lack of content given by the slot.- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I'm doing my best to not say anything that specifically refers to you having altslipped and given that I obviously knew who you were it's not like it informed my game plan in any way.
Honestly my biggest problem with the current gamestate is that I not only scumread both of them but I scumread together and town is never that good.If you're referring to Xaldin the only competition seems to be Saix given that people are townreading Axel for ??? so I don't understand? - II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar
- II Xigbar