This post is wasteful. We need to use every post in a meaningful way. Look at the wiki. It tells you how many scum are in the game. Furthermore, I don't understand why you approach this like he is for sure town? If you think he is town, then I get the caution, but I don't understand how you would come to this conclusion so early. I'm just going to assume for now you two are close friends for now. Still a lil bleh with it.
Bad reasoning. Scummy is scummy. At least in my books.In post 11, Vedith wrote: Because although I doubt there's scum motive to it considering it's you
Ew. Don't "shitpost" here unless there is someone worthwhile reading in your commentary.In post 14, Carcalilly wrote: I wanna be an even mix of shitposts and go getter. :')
Quality over quantity. Lynch someone scummy. Just because someone has more posts, shouldn't protect them from rope if they could likely flip scum.In post 14, Carcalilly wrote: OK, the reason why I want a massclaim is 1.to know, 2.we dont know if it is AI, I just have this feeling that it is (as I explained in one of my other posts) and 3.Verbose players have a small advantage, so I guess we could try not to lynch them in equal circumstances. Like, I'd rather lynch a Standard player.
Similar feelings, but something tells me they are just buddies goofing off like most familiars do. (Hi Comm ) Scum aren't going to be THAT obvious. If one of them could provide evidence of playing together in the past, that would be nice. (without burning a post to do so of course)In post 15, Dragnalus wrote:I'd be suspecting Carca and Vedith from the start, but more specifically Vedith who highlighted that 'people will call you scum for this' because it's a very awkward thing to say,
This is like disarming a trap. If you thought this to be something that scum would likely do, then why bring it up now instead of waiting to see if someone would fall into it? I do however agree somewhat with the sentiment. Ish. More to come on this later probably.In post 16, CommKnight wrote: Anyway, back to it. I think the best course of action for now might be to agree now to the idea that anyone caught trying to run up their post count to run out of posts early will be voted on even if they can't defend themselves. If they run out of posts before we're even half-way through the day phase or found a reasonable lynchee, then the action is in itself scummy and scum-motivated. Thus we need to agree to run anyone up trying to weasel their way out of contributing in the late day phase process.
I dunnu. Not exactly happy that he (Carcallily) is already at 6 or 7 posts. I like his attitude, but not his style. He claims that he wants to interact with people, but I think there maybe better ways to do so without burning through so many posts. You won't be seeing more than 2 - 3 posts from me a day if even that for the first bit.In post 23, Randomnamechange wrote: shadethrow at carcallily is suspicous.
pisskop and carc are trs rn.
Can we also try and avoid basic "___ & ____ are town" posts as well? It saves you a post from me having to ask why.
18 | 20 ( )