tee hee!
VOTE: creature
@town Do
tee hee!
98% of the time scum will not shoot a claimed mason since a mason is not really a threat until LYLO and they can use the "this guy and this guy are scum" paranoia.In post 24, TwoInAMillion wrote:Why do you think claiming mason on day 1 is a smart pro town move?
That's why you should change your vote to Creature so we stop sending mixed signals.In post 30, Mulch wrote:Anyway I request that you all sheep me and Nero now that we are confirmed town anyway
though this is pretty similar to my thought process.In post 164, Theta Alpine wrote:well obviously you can rule out the first person on the wagon since they started it
you can probably rule out the second person as well
anything after that is fair game for the sheepy and bandwagony statement
as long as they provide no new thoughts on the wagon that is
not really. I mean obviously, you think he's scum right? but if he were town that means his thoughts about Mario were honest.In post 186, Yumeko Jabami wrote:because he seems to contradict your interpretation of events and I'm wondering why you didn't call him out on it.
a double voter wouldn't affect how many votes it takes to lynch.In post 199, Mulch wrote:There could be a double voter
b/c he was like "oh just lynch me" and you think that's a VT/scum fake claiming VT?In post 203, Mulch wrote:He is too self aware and I don't feel like a villa would be pressed to the point of puedo claiming vt so early?
do you really think we'd get 5 votes on him?In post 215, Theta Alpine wrote:we are not quick lynching right now
Why didn't you say anything until I prodded you?In post 229, massive wrote:Well after the first five pages of nonsense I wasn't expecting two pages of wallposts that I glazed over.
Well not really. It's null b/c it comes from both scum not wanting to do things and stupid town/town with a pr. I still think lurker is a pretty decent indication of scum.In post 336, wavemode wrote:No it isn't. Lurking is anti-town but completely NAI
The difference is that I know whatIn post 323, Mary Saotome wrote:Are you saying that the mario wagon isn't "Doing things." Can you tell me the dif between what you're doing with the flavor wagon vs the Mario wagon?
In post 412, Mulch wrote:agreed it's super scummy. But like, yeah. I think Flavor has been townier with future posts
In post 130, Mary Saotome wrote:I Mary have graced this thread and will now read I know you've been waiting for me but be calm.
these just felt kinda stall-y, idk.In post 152, Mary Saotome wrote:VOTE: flavorleaf
Can't argue with thatgoing to readbut Mulch can you try to make your posts longer? you have 1/3rd of the thread it makes it harder to read.
and this is just kinda dumb. Like I was pushing Flavor for ~reasons~ and me knowing what I'm doing has absolutely nothing to do with the Mario wagon and this whole thing feels like she's playing mediator between me and Dave.In post 323, Mary Saotome wrote:Are you saying that the mario wagon isn't "Doing things." Can you tell me the dif between what you're doing with the flavor wagon vs the Mario wagon?
oh thank god. I nearly forgot.In post 453, Mary Saotome wrote:Yes you are partner we're just doing that little distance thing remember?
I mean the "stall" thing isIn post 453, Mary Saotome wrote:I guess they were gonna stallish posts because I was gonna read then went and did other things but I don't get why the whole stall thing is scummy to you. Where does Dave come into the question I'm just questioning you because of what I stated in my other post
eh.In post 471, Mulch wrote:Hey Nero would you say I'm being more fun to play with than in large 203
I mean, I never said this either.In post 568, Mary Saotome wrote:but you stated that's why you hated the Mario wagon so why is it okay to be sheepy and bandwagon on flavor but not Mario?
like I'm clearly talking about Wavemode vote. I mean sure, you could argue that if he's scum then the Mario wagon was bad but it's not something I said.