This is basic mafia 101.In post 368, Havo wrote:Longer deadlines = more discussion which only benefits town.
Also so is unvoting a claimed PR 24 hours in, instead of
Tunneling to force a claim.
Mulch is too good of a player to not know this.
This is basic mafia 101.In post 368, Havo wrote:Longer deadlines = more discussion which only benefits town.
So much this!! Love this post.In post 365, Thor665 wrote:Let me try this;In post 363, Chip Butty wrote:Let me try that again...In post 357, Sergtacos wrote:I mean, I don't want anyone to actually soft claim or hard claim in D1 because we need help from the power roles and we can't really have an advantage against the mafia if our power role players die.
What you are not understanding but which i have already pointed put is that town.havo hal already made himself a prime NK target by softing he is the strongest town PR.
If he's a powerful investigative role - scum's best option is to use PRs that will effect his investigation (e.g. roleblock) because he will likely be protected.
If he is a powerful protective role scum's best option is to kill him.
So why should we help scum sort their best play?
Describe why he's scum or this conversation should die in a fire.
A full claim without L-1 is derp.
In other words you're lurking? Care to explain?In post 378, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Don't mind me, I'm actively avoiding to engage the thread right now.
This is fine from a Havo is town perspective, but from a Havo is scum perspective the point was to deny him the shelter of a vague false claim.In post 365, Thor665 wrote: If he's a powerful investigative role - scum's best option is to use PRs that will effect his investigation (e.g. roleblock) because he will likely be protected.
If he is a powerful protective role scum's best option is to kill him.
So why should we help scum sort their best play?
.
Wrong wrong wrongIn post 375, Havo wrote:This is basic mafia 101.In post 368, Havo wrote:Longer deadlines = more discussion which only benefits town.
Also so is unvoting a claimed PR 24 hours in, instead of
Tunneling to force a claim.
Mulch is too good of a player to not know this.
Why is this garbage? Your claim is scum 101 some vague ass "oh, I'm a power role!!!"In post 370, Havo wrote:Mulch is too good of a player to be pushing a claimed PR this early.
His reasoning of "This is exactly what I did as mafia" is garbage.
Me not wanting to hardclaim a PR 24 hours in is not an unreasonable concept.
I posted my support of WM without giving away my role.In post 378, humaneatingmonkey wrote:So why didn't you fully believe WM's claim earlier?
Don't mind me, I'm actively avoiding to engage the thread right now.
Where did the term "soft" claim come from? What is a soft claim? Why is there a need for this term?In post 385, Mulch wrote:Why is this garbage? Your claim is scum 101 some vague ass "oh, I'm a power role!!!"In post 370, Havo wrote:Mulch is too good of a player to be pushing a claimed PR this early.
His reasoning of "This is exactly what I did as mafia" is garbage.
Me not wanting to hardclaim a PR 24 hours in is not an unreasonable concept.
Because I didn't want to give away my role in any way.In post 391, humaneatingmonkey wrote:You were flip-floppy about it tho, and that's what pinged me the most. You looked like as if you wanted to open an opportunity to jump on that wagon if it forms, but you also don't want to be obvious. Even when you said that he could be town, you said "for now." That's how I read your post about it.
I will post more about this later when I get home on my laptop.In post 393, Havo wrote:Because I didn't want to give away my role in any way.In post 391, humaneatingmonkey wrote:You were flip-floppy about it tho, and that's what pinged me the most. You looked like as if you wanted to open an opportunity to jump on that wagon if it forms, but you also don't want to be obvious. Even when you said that he could be town, you said "for now." That's how I read your post about it.
who are you referring/talking to?In post 391, humaneatingmonkey wrote:You were flip-floppy about it tho, and that's what pinged me the most. You looked like as if you wanted to open an opportunity to jump on that wagon if it forms, but you also don't want to be obvious. Even when you said that he could be town, you said "for now." That's how I read your post about it.
I'm so terribly sorry I'm not playing my game up to your standards.In post 395, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I think Havo's claim could be town. Not much can be said about his performance so far tho. In my experience as a PR, I claimed prematurely under pressure—but that's because there were only 12 hours before deadline. I don't have much experience but I think the motivation for an obvious soft-claim should be the one in scrutiny here. Is that scum or is that town? I can't trust my judgment right now but I think it's town.