How about:
for Nero Cain?
I like
The point is not that RC is a condescending jerk but that he exudes and overflows with confidence, there is a difference.In post 330, PJ. wrote:Anti-nom any RC title about him being a condescending jerk. Rewarding bad behavior, ect.
Do you have any reasons, or is this people just shooting down my idea for no reasons given for the Nth time?In post 332, PJ. wrote:Mmm, I'm gonna have to disagree with that assessment.
Explain it???
Neither? I am doing it because that is just how I see RadiantCowbells and I think the title fits well. I don't have a bias of good/bad with this, it is just how I see them.In post 352, Accountant wrote:LQ, are you really awarding this title to RC to memorialize a behavior you find cool about him? Or are you doing it as a jab?
I have zero alts.In post 355, Psyche wrote:is lq not a wgeurts alt
I've been in a game with him. How could I be his alt?In post 357, Psyche wrote:yes of course wgeurts is the main
I don't need to cheat.In post 360, Killthestory wrote:banned for cheating in mafia
Pretty sure anything I say now is going to look like I am cheating...In post 369, Not_Mafia wrote:Exactly what a cheater would sayIn post 367, LicketyQuickety wrote:I am completely bemused, tbh.
Its possible since I haven't played with you before???In post 374, mhsmith0 wrote:Is this a good time or a bad time to admit I'm an LQ alt
In post 377, mhsmith0 wrote:OR HAVE YOU
I wasn't. I was commenting on my own suggestion.In post 382, Annadog40 wrote:Can't comment on your own title. That's cheating.
We need to do a branch as some point.In post 385, wgeurts wrote:You are now technically an alt of my alt. The web grows.In post 374, mhsmith0 wrote:Is this a good time or a bad time to admit I'm an LQ alt
Hopefully not. I'm not much for the camera and my voice still cracks and I am 30.In post 407, Psyche wrote:one day we will all post in video and audio
Seconded.In post 435, Shaziro wrote:Dunno if it's been done before, but
Nom Aristophanes: Mr. Brightside
He's very cheerful in my experience, and is always looking on the bright side of things. Add to that the musical reference since he seems to prefer titles with puns or references, I figure it's a slam dunk for him.
Yes, its perfect.In post 439, Psyche wrote:what does the reference to the killers song do?
wikipedia says that lyrically the song depicts the jealousy and paranoia of a man who suspects his significant other is cheating on him
despite the name "Mr. Brightside" it seems like the exact opposite of the kind of point you're trying to make
@Accountant?In post 442, Psyche wrote:Not convinced.
This ^In post 449, mastina wrote:That makes the song reference a perfect fit for his character--the song might officially have a negative connotation with it, but Aristophanes is the type of guy who can put a positive spin on it such that it is agoodthing, matching the upbeat nature of the song's tune rather than the literal nature of the song's given meaning.
So Inththe Aristophanes title.
Lighten up, Jesus.In post 463, PJ. wrote:Sorry I don't buy the, "the lyrics are ambiguous that there can be multiple meanings" argument. Without beating a dead horse about it being the official meaning, just read the lyrics. This isn't like...The Trees by Rush or something, it's just a straight forward confession. The second part of the Mastina argument in conjunction with the first, paraphrased, is "Ari consistently ignores the context/meaning of the written word and creates his own interpretation", which is honestly kind of rude.
I got warned for making a joke at Ari's expense with the 4-0 thing, but honestly, is that any more rude than his "friends"(and probably the people who hit report) nominating him for reminding them of a song about a guy who watched his girlfriend kiss another man, than racks himself with jealously/paranoia all night and every night since the incident but then keeps pretending that nothing is wrong, hiding behind a forced cheery disposition? I may of made a joke at his expense, but you guys are making a "serious" at his expense and patting yourselves on the back for it, it's very bizarre.
To end this post on a postive note, I don't know if Davsto actuallynominated Ari for Mr Blue Skyor not, but I agree wholeheartedly. The song is literally an ode to the cheery blue sky after a bunch of rainy days(it's also the final act in Concerto for a Rainy Day). Ari, to me, is an INCREDIBLY cheerful guy, regardless of the situation. He never really takes anything in a bad light, including my 4-0 joke, at least not publicly. Any post I've ever read by the guy has been bright and cheery, and especially among the grey, disgusting muck that makes up most of MS, it's honestly a great change of pace. Someone who seems genuinely happy and enjoying everyone's company, He IS the blue sky, it's not a forced/fake dispostion.
PPPffffffffftttt.
It reminds me of Ragnar. Don't worry, you don't have to understand, Psyche knows what I'm talking aboutIn post 485, Accountant wrote:I was all ready to support Psyche and tear down Panzer but I'm having second thoughts because that new avatar is t r a s h
Can't tell if serious or not...In post 528, Psyche wrote:what if i instead institute kuroi's idea and end all title discussion foreverIn post 524, Papa Zito wrote:I'm telling you Psyche.
Create a new security group.
Add the people who have titles to it.
Give that group posting permissions to this forum.
problem solved
*Cringe*In post 691, Psyche wrote:ok gimme five dollars here and ill give anyone you want the title you want for ten days
I actually don't mind that at all. I just thought "Cheater" fit because of my playstyle and how my first few games playing forum Mafia started.In post 926, mastina wrote:Cheating is against site rules, title should be revoked.In post 920, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm fine with "Cheater"
Rules are "guidelines"would be better.
Its just that I tend to be right for the wrong reasons according to some people more than anything.In post 930, Psyche wrote:must alert mods for further investigation into lq's "playstyle"
EBWOP.In post 932, LicketyQuickety wrote:Its just that I tend to be right for the wrong reasons (when I'm right) according to some people more than anything.In post 930, Psyche wrote:must alert mods for further investigation into lq's "playstyle"
ThereIn post 997, Davsto wrote:If by "friend" you mean "people that like you" (I don't really count you online only guys as my "friends" sry) then sure, you arguably do need five people who like you to get a title, but let's face it, it's incredibly difficult to be an active member for more than a couple of months and not have five people who like you. It's not like it's a difficult social barrier to reach - even shotty managed it.
Therefore, the 5 nths serve as a process to make sure the title itself is good for the person. 5 people does not a popularity contest make.
Did you know every time you say "fuck you" to someone a demon gets his wings?In post 1013, Psyche wrote:um, fuck you?In post 1009, Nexus wrote:ffs psyche get your head out of your ass.
And also is no guarantee that a title goes through, so, yes, its pretty arbitrary.In post 1024, SleepyKrew wrote:The 5 nths thing is silly but it'd also be silly to not set an arbitrary number somewhere imo
Lets make a thread to discuss whether the idea thread was a good idea or not.In post 1028, Davsto wrote:we should discuss that in the idea threadIn post 1027, Psyche wrote:maybe the idea thread was a bad idea
Don't you have a sense of humor? This shit is gold.In post 1032, Accountant wrote:*yawns*
Its not tedious, its hilarious because it is tedious.In post 1034, Accountant wrote:I have a sense of humor and it's telling me that this discussion is tedious
This.In post 1084, Ether wrote:Psyche please stop I'll give you pizza.
I was one such person who got nommed 5 times for "Cheater".In post 1444, Psyche wrote:there was a title that got five nths recently that i basically ignored
can someone remind me what it was
I don't either, but I like the way it sounds. IDK maybe its in my wiki or something.In post 1451, Psyche wrote:i have no idea why that would be a good title for LQ
Bit of personal bias there, I guess.In post 3211, Psyche wrote:then u r dead to me
In post 3240, Firebringer wrote:Lol psyche actually just gave out lil quib with zero noms .
I am not sure because I don't know if its malicious. Maybe psyche was a psychopath all along?In post 3243, Firebringer wrote:Did the title fairy just commit title assault?In post 3242, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 3240, Firebringer wrote:Lol psyche actually just gave out lil quib with zero noms .
didn't even ask.
Is this one of those "I didn't know what X was, therefore I am X"???In post 3248, UC Voyager wrote:http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=quigIn post 3247, LicketyQuickety wrote:I just have no idea what the fuck a quig is.
Its not that I mean any offense, its just I would rather be a boring piece of nothing than have a negative connotation associated with myself.In post 3254, Psyche wrote:sighh
Watch TV then.In post 3256, vonflare wrote:im bored
LMAOIn post 3265, UC Voyager wrote:calm down......i dont know deep lore site stuff......nor do i think i want to...In post 3264, vonflare wrote:uc voyager thinks he can just waltz in here and be up to date with all the deep site lore smh