Like, pretty much
I never get analysis like "well it is scummy, but the reason at the end of the day it is scum is..."
The linearity of the logic is annoying.
I'm going to return back to my verbose mode.In post 994, Realeo wrote:I am the first guy who made a stand on why you are unlikely to be non-traitor.
Move Alchemist to the left and make the wide of the bar smaller.In post 520, Realeo wrote:As a protest for being scumread for "being verbose", I'm using a picture because..it's zero word?
The more left you are, the townier I read you.
The wider the bar, the more uncertain I am.
Not to be read in an absolute scale (conf town to conf scum) but as a relative scale (the townies of all to the scummies of all)
I did not say that.In post 1006, Chip Butty wrote:So, your CURRENT position is still that UnaH Is scum but not the traitor?
Yes I did.In post 1040, Chip Butty wrote:In post 1008, Realeo wrote:I did not say that.In post 1006, Chip Butty wrote:So, your CURRENT position is still that UnaH Is scum but not the traitor?No you didn't. Why are you squirming?In post 1039, Realeo wrote:I have addressed it in page 41. Please help yourself.
I did not imply that I am sure there is no recruitment.In post 1041, Chip Butty wrote:No response to this, either.In post 1009, Chip Butty wrote:Are...are you actually saying 'yeah UnaH is scum but let's not lynch him because the non-traitors have higher priority'?In post 1007, Realeo wrote:I know, but isn't out priority is to hit the other two mafia because those are where the mafia power role?
I mean, first, it's either 7-3 or 7-2 (+1). We don't have much wriggle room.
Second, why so sure there was no recruitment?
Third, wow.
I endorse this question.In post 1077, Chip Butty wrote:Do people feel that Realeo has adequately clarified his current position on a UnaH lynch?
I may as well move to UnahIn post 1099, Realeo wrote:Like CommKnight is so far to the center, I would lynch Unah in a heart beat.