Mini 1947: Board Game uPick: The Expansion! Game Over

Cabd · Post Post #1854 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:58 pm

Yeah pretty much. Block.him if possible.

Cabd · Post Post #1869 (isolation #1) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:32 am

In post 1864, The Betting Pool wrote:Porkens - Night Three: delay morph

???

Cabd · Post Post #1879 (isolation #2) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:53 am

In post 1875, ActionDan wrote:I think the game was designed well enough from the roles I see, and I appreciate the claim candy.

This would have been more of a "game" if D1 didn't open and close with that gambit. Game swung way too hard to town after. (side note: while as town I don't think I would have ever voted Morph after the results of D1, I don't think that gambit should ever be employed again.)

I fully admit the gambit is something I'd only have done on about half this player list. Mostly because I don't think the response would have been alignment indicative for a lot fo players here.

Cabd · Post Post #1889 (isolation #3) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:23 am

Hey dan, you remember that one post in the dance game where it gave me an unshakable townread on you and I stepped out?

Your one post I kept coming back to this game was similar but in the opposite alignment-direction.

Cabd · Post Post #1892 (isolation #4) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:29 am

In post 1891, Creature wrote:Pretty sure my claim wouldn't be buyable if I claimed just gladiator.

Given my day one fakeclaim, if you'd gladiated us i am almost positive we would have rolled over and died and called you damn near confirmed town. Or was it not usable day one?

Cabd · Post Post #1894 (isolation #5) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:35 am

In post 1893, ActionDan wrote:
In post 1889, Cabd wrote:Your one post I kept coming back to this game was similar but in the opposite alignment-direction.
That will tend to happen when everyone wants to lynch you and your scum partner is fated to be offed D1

Yeah :~(

You did your best with what you were given. It's unfortunate that night one no actions went through.

Cabd · Post Post #1896 (isolation #6) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:37 am

Actually, had we been gladiated day one, Raskbells would have endgamed. Pretty sure.

Cabd · Post Post #1903 (isolation #7) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:25 am

In post 1902, Porkens wrote:I demand a redo.

I wouldn't hold your breath.

Best to let this one lie.

Cabd · Post Post #1916 (isolation #8) » Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:51 pm

Hey Mariar, why did you replace out anyways? We wanted to be neighbors!

Cabd · Post Post #1922 (isolation #9) » Fri Oct 13, 2017 5:10 am

Agree that asking mods for fakeclaims isn't explicitly bad. Ideally as scum you have your fakeclaim prepped in advance of needing to claim, though.

Concession isn't ideal, no, but in some cases if the game is effectively over It's no huge deal.

Cabd · Post Post #1942 (isolation #10) » Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:45 am

In post 1941, Tammy wrote:usurper

Found the problem!