Why would someone be able to explain it right now? Looks like you’re saying stuff for the sake of saying it.In post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.
VOTE: Zulfy
Why would someone be able to explain it right now? Looks like you’re saying stuff for the sake of saying it.In post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.
In post 203, necro wrote:Rhah is probably town.
In post 204, necro wrote:Zulfy is probably scum.
Interesting. Assuming as scum you wouldn’t make such an obvious contradiction, explain this please.In post 207, Flairs wrote:
It’s not. I’m not even on it now, and Zulfy is on it twice.
This is a perfect setup to try and state a now town read on Chip, attempt to mislynch me, and then after my flip, you can easily backtrack that read on Chip and start pushing him.In post 347, CheekyTeeky wrote:In fact this point is making me feel like chip is probably town if I'm on the right track about you.
You don’t think I’d be bold enough as scum to push a mislynch.In post 355, CheekyTeeky wrote:Damn Morality I think you're town because you wouldn't push me this hard knowing my flip. Otherwise suicide. Yeah I'm a fan of OMGUS so lynch me.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: UCV
I was referring to those votes being the ones Cheeky did.In post 358, UC Voyager wrote:uhh. you forgot cheekyteekyIn post 354, Morality wrote:Necro, Rhah, UCV, Chip, and now myself are the people you put real votes on. Not going to count your early vander read.
Funny how Necro/ucv are easy people to just throw votes on based on how they play, Rhah was looking like he could be mislynched, and then Chip and I easily look like we could potentially be pushed to stop any momentum we would have gained through our pushes and set up potential mislynches after with each.
This is what you did, this is a fact. Besides the set up potential mislynches, because that can’t be known until after your flip if that were the case.
i am????idk. people didn't like how i dont like it when people make reads with out evidence
So basically you’re waiting until you can figure out and get the timing right on the case to get people to sheep. Got it. Solid, but you should have just waited and then did it, rather than state that poor trajectory considering you stated a town read and then a scum read within a few posts without even me posting.In post 409, CheekyTeeky wrote:It's when people (usually scum) show up whenever they're talked about (usually negatively).In post 403, Chip Butty wrote:What's 'beetlejuicing'?
I'm still going to make a case for why people should be on Morality's wagon. I'm just hungover so be patient.
Lol? I don’t get desperate as scum. I’ve gotten guiltied, by Flairs himself even, and still didn’t get desperate. If I have desperate tendencies coming out, that means my Boonskiies playstyle is coming out, and it’s town aligned. I self meta more as town than scum.In post 419, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why are you getting desperate Morality?
Why? Trying to get your way out of this rut? I already explained where it was. If anything, the fact he hasn’t jumped on me yet is making me less sure of that read.In post 420, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tell us about your Zulfy read progression please.
In post 415, CheekyTeeky wrote:Oh lol Morality seriously couldn't be more full of himself. Yep keep posting, it helps people see what I mean by manipulation. Like seriously consider some of the points he's making. It's all speculation that he presents as fact.
I go from town reading your push, to saying you're 100% scum simply because you didn't vote me when town would have and you've spent more time analysing me than your scum read that you've tunneled from the start....for a really bs RVS reason that you've never expanded on or taken any new info into account on. Your entire ISO stinks of scum. There is nothing hard to read about you. Don't listen to his lies.
Morality is scum.
Where did it say I was hesitant with Zulfy...? I wasn’t hesitant with you, I didn’t feel like pushing you at the time because I did my assuming reaction testing thing in my Light character.In post 425, CheekyTeeky wrote:How do you go from this to:In post 67, Morality wrote:Why would someone be able to explain it right now? Looks like you’re saying stuff for the sake of saying it.In post 31, Zulfy wrote:Don't make reads you're not gonna explain.
VOTE: Zulfy
In post 417, Morality wrote:The fact he called me hesitant should show that I am not scum aligned. I expected this to happen. People unfamiliar with me tend to push me as scum.
How were you hesitant with tunneling Zulfy? You were only hesitant with me.
Sure. That’s a possibility. But isn’t that exactly why Cheeky attacked me and paired up with you?In post 426, Rhah wrote:In post 417, Morality wrote: @Rhah - Yes. Exactly that. Look at the difference between the two, though. Necro’s is coming from an ignorance is bliss mentality, whereas Cheeky’s comes from just an ignorant mentality.
I'm sure the distinction's only made at all because one of these players is against your agenda and the other isn't.
Sure, but I’m a crazy wildcard as town, and I have proven I get results.In post 431, Rhah wrote:Only going to quote one of these statements cause the other similar things you say are around the...same level of headache? The fact that you admit to being reckless and a wild card as scum literally means we can expect anything from you, including doing things that youIn post 417, Morality wrote: I at all hesitant when I am scum? If anything, I have a balls to the wall kind of mentality as scum.wouldn't. So it doesn't mean a whole lot. All the self meta stuff is puke.
Notice how Cheeky continually states making this too easy yet says nothing, Rhah.In post 434, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 417, Morality wrote:The fact he called me hesitant should show that I am not scum aligned.Stop you're making this too easy. And my case isn't eloquent because I'm effing recovering from last night but you had to push me while I'm down so I'm not letting you get away with it.In post 429, Morality wrote:Hesitance implies I stop doing something because I was worried. I’m the guy that had a 2+ year scum streak and has only been lynched once as town in 3+ years. And I can’t even remember the last time I got lynched day 1. When would I ever be “hesitant”?
Lol, k, then you’re just a terrible player. It’s the exact same thing that happened. That’s why I fucking said it.In post 436, Rhah wrote:Nope.In post 432, Morality wrote: Sure. That’s a possibility. But isn’t that exactly why Cheeky attacked me and paired up with you?
How am I deflecting anything? I actually feel those roles are reversed. I’m the one giving actual reasons, and she just goes “too easy”, so that’s incorrect on your part, but makes sense with the skill level you show that you’d be wrong. Unless I was wrong on which of the two of you are scum, but I think you’re just horrible town.In post 440, Rhah wrote:Not really. She said you were scum before I said I'd be cool with the wagon, then she voted there. I had a scumread on you before all of that. She wouldn't really need me for that wagon. I think she's direct enough to 1v1 so she wouldn't need to rely on someone to strongarm a mislynch if that were the case, let alone me, in clear violation of the supposed progression she had on my slot. The thing is, it's towny from her. Your response to direct situations is "whataboutthis". I'm sure there's several things you can do instead of deflecting. I've observed the same things you have.
I mean, they should. If you’re scum, it’s not necessarily you being ignorant. Rhah’s just ignorant as hell horrible town.In post 441, CheekyTeeky wrote:Meh keep calling us ignorant, maybe people will believe you eventually. You're not town so...
In post 446, CheekyTeeky wrote:But unlike you, I assume others are intelligent enough to work out how you're massively contridicting your own arguments. So I don't need to weave a scum dialogue for you like you're trying so hard to make for me. That's what I mean by too easy. You're shooting down your own arguments.In post 437, Morality wrote:Notice how Cheeky continually states making this too easy yet says nothing, Rhah.In post 434, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 417, Morality wrote:The fact he called me hesitant should show that I am not scum aligned.Stop you're making this too easy. And my case isn't eloquent because I'm effing recovering from last night but you had to push me while I'm down so I'm not letting you get away with it.In post 429, Morality wrote:Hesitance implies I stop doing something because I was worried. I’m the guy that had a 2+ year scum streak and has only been lynched once as town in 3+ years. And I can’t even remember the last time I got lynched day 1. When would I ever be “hesitant”?
I’m a headache of a player, yes, but a headache that will catch scum, and a headache as town.
I mean, you’ve already town cased me.In post 452, CheekyTeeky wrote:I've already written half of it. I'm not going to log onto my computer because that requires getting out of bed. It's not my fault you're being scummy now in ways I'm trying my best to point out.In post 445, Morality wrote:Cheeky is waiting until I say stuff where she can fabricate some sort of crap case. She says she’s waiting until she recovers, yet she continues to post multiple times. she just keeps going, “you’re scum” as any sort of reasoning, which even as town would be horrible. Unfamiliar scum nearly always target me, and generally I get grouped up on. As scum, I am not a lone wolf player. Players here can attest to that.
Put all my posts together. It makes a wall.In post 453, Rhah wrote:Morality wrote:And Rhah, stop being ignorant. She changed the fucking read without me posting in between. That has already happened. God damn, read and actually look at what’s happening. Terrible.
I'm aware of that part. Seen town do it before. Give me more of the wall-y cases, let's see if that works.
I don’t believe I’ve ever failed to do this when I said this.In post 457, Morality wrote:I’ll conf town myself eventually.
Yet it was scummy for you when Necro did it?In post 458, Rhah wrote:Morality wrote:Why did she town read me for the posts I made, then that became the reason to scum read? Like, come on. You can’t be that stupid.
Yet, it's such an errant contradiction that I can acutely argue how it doesn't make sense for scum to do.
Also, you aren’t pointing anything out. You just talk about yourself and say I’m scum.In post 452, CheekyTeeky wrote:I've already written half of it. I'm not going to log onto my computer because that requires getting out of bed. It's not my fault you're being scummy now in ways I'm trying my best to point out.In post 445, Morality wrote:Cheeky is waiting until I say stuff where she can fabricate some sort of crap case. She says she’s waiting until she recovers, yet she continues to post multiple times. she just keeps going, “you’re scum” as any sort of reasoning, which even as town would be horrible. Unfamiliar scum nearly always target me, and generally I get grouped up on. As scum, I am not a lone wolf player. Players here can attest to that.
Wait, this is a direct contradiction. You asked earlier on this about Necro doing the same exact thing as Cheeky, yet with cheeky, you town read it both ways and Necro is just hardscum because of it? You are the one who pointed out they were the exact same thing. I was aware, but I didn’t bring it up.In post 463, Rhah wrote:In post 460, Morality wrote: Yet it was scummy for you when Necro did it?
I believe it was you who established they were two different scenarios who warranted different reactions, right? So did I. Speaking of which, he's hardscum anyway. Hey necro, if I wagon you will you call me unintelligent and bad? That's kinda my fetish.
there’s no reason for you to. You change your mind, you’re fucked more than you already are.In post 464, CheekyTeeky wrote:Anyway there's enough content now for people to analyse. There's no point in engaging you any further. I'm not changing my mind.
No thanks. You’re hoping a scum buddy comes to bail you out.In post 467, CheekyTeeky wrote:Town aren't scared about what their actions look like to others. Don't be that guy right now. Let's agree to disagree so others can catch up.In post 466, Morality wrote:there’s no reason for you to. You change your mind, you’re fucked more than you already are.In post 464, CheekyTeeky wrote:Anyway there's enough content now for people to analyse. There's no point in engaging you any further. I'm not changing my mind.
What can you attribute to CT being town play? Explain please.In post 470, Rhah wrote:Putting that aside there is nothing remotely town about necro's play, for one. Considering I can attribute town to CT's play I'd say I have more reasons for those reads than just the one.
Fighting with Rhah is fighting with cheeky. He’s either hardcore in Cheek’s pocket, or scum, I think the former, so it benefits town for me to break Rhah out of that.In post 472, acidphoenix wrote:boon how about if you're going to fight you fight with cheeky instead of with rhah
:>
Also, cheeky does absolutely nothing.In post 472, acidphoenix wrote:boon how about if you're going to fight you fight with cheeky instead of with rhah
:>
You and Cheeky are the only ones on me.In post 477, Rhah wrote:If Cheeky has towncased you like you've said about four times, relax on the emotions and enjoy your clear status in this town, because the unvotes are coming. One already did.