In post 13, Quick wrote:Slow game. Looks like everyone has confirmed? Why the lack of posts?
Assemblrotws, any reason for the vote? Anything at all?
In post 29, Jamiet99uk wrote:What's EBWOP?
In post 30, Jamiet99uk wrote:Also by the way, does this site have an automatic vote counter or anything?
In post 59, lucca261 wrote:
was that the one that Grey got force replaced and everybody was fighting everyone? I think I remember that. it made me quit mafia, for like, six months. so, how are ya? any reads so far?
VOTE: Cheeky
serious vote.
In post 107, Jamiet99uk wrote:Right Aubrey, you're so very, very clever, you win the game on you own. I'll just sit here and not post anything.
In post 0, Torque wrote:During one night during the game, the mason team may attempt to recruit another member. If you attempt to recruit town, they will be added to the masonry as "Recruited Mason". If you attempt to recruit mafia, the attempt will fail.
In post 102, Jamiet99uk wrote:I'm thinking about our Masons. Important we keep them alive if we can. They effectively have a 1-shot copscan.
In post 157, Maki Harukawa wrote:Don't think Quick/Aubrey are partners with this I wanna know why Aubrey jumped in here instead of letting Assme answer and then putting in your 2 cents seems a bit wkish
In post 159, Maki Harukawa wrote:Was this topic important what so ever or more so banter for you Chisa?
In post 159, Maki Harukawa wrote:I'm scared that I agree with most of this (my) post.
In post 166, Maki Harukawa wrote:need to see more from Aubrey
In post 176, Maki Harukawa wrote:I don't know who I want to vote in the 2 because I doubt it's scum vs scum (Cheeky and Awoo)
In post 185, Epic Fial wrote:MY NAME IS ERIC BUT POEPLE CALL ME EPIC BECAUSE OF MY LAST NAME.
In post 194, Epic Fial wrote:Maybe scum are lurking weebs in this game. Another possibility is that they are posting a lot but are not weebs. So I'm going to be considering both weebs and non-weebs, and people who are lurking and people doing the opposite of that, whatever it is called. On the other hand, they might be in the middle somewhere. Nearly certain we can hit scum in one of those groups.
In post 202, Lalendra wrote:
Why wouldn't you mind a wagon on someone you don't scumread? Is he null for you at the moment?
In post 209, lucca261 wrote:question: what do you thought about jamie explanation of the readlist?
In post 220, Quick wrote:I think Aubrey is kinda suspect for not giving as good of content
In post 255, Jamiet99uk wrote:It seems to me that Epic Fial and Aubrey are both voting for me because they don't like my style, rather than for anything that actually makes me seem likely to be scum.
Kek.
In post 274, lucca261 wrote:thinking awoo is scum. this last post feels like someone who is trying to participate, rather than trying to scumhunt.
In post 234, Aubrey wrote:He's still voting Awoo for a early day 1 vote that has changed. I'd like to know what he thinks about newer events regarding Awoo a bit more, and how those events are effecting his stance on the slot.
In post 307, Jamiet99uk wrote:kinda buried in a big block of text and not directly addressing me.
In post 308, Jamiet99uk wrote:Having re-read Awoo I no longer scumread him (not her, sorry it was the female picture). Awoo seems to be looking carefully at people's reactions which is good scumhunting play. I particularly agree with this response to Lucca261. It's egregiously scummy to want to know what people think you would do or say as scum (so you can later avoid doing or saying things that will get you scumread).
VOTE: UNVOTE until I can properly reread Lucca.
In post 309, CommKnight wrote:Aubrey was the only one who really got past me.
In post 327, Jamiet99uk wrote:Lalendra is doing the exact same thing with a vote from the shitphase still being on me because, as Lalendra has said, they haven't had a better option yet. Do you scumread Lalendra for that behaviour, Aubrey?
In post 325, Aubrey wrote:If you scum-read a slot, they should hold a good amount of your attention. As the slot begins to change, shouldn't you take note of that instead of being forced into recap?
In post 327, Jamiet99uk wrote:Do you scumread Lalendra for that behaviour, Aubrey?
In post 342, Jamiet99uk wrote:- If I sheep your vote this turn, and (y)our target is lynched, and flips TOWN, then you agree that YOU will be the lynch tomorrow
In post 363, Jamiet99uk wrote:I will agree follow him, and to vote for myself today, if he agrees that he will lead a D2 lynch on *himself* if I flip town.
What's it to be, CommKnight? I am not afraid to die.
In post 382, Flavor Leaf wrote:Fair enough.
I don’t like Maki’s and Lucca’s back and forth a few pages back. Something about it’s weird to me.
The whole both could be scum/one of them likely is scum seems like theatre bailing each other out, and allowing both onto multiple mislynches with reasoning, while distancing away from each other.
In post 442, Aubrey wrote:We've already had a similar conversation with Jamiet after he said something else previously that was soft claimish at the very beginning of the game. It should have been already quietly determined to everyone he wasn't a mason.
In post 486, Epic Fial wrote:In post 467, CommKnight wrote:{CheekyTeeky}
{Awoo, Aubrey}
{northsidegal, Maki Harukawa, Chisa Yukizome}
{Flavor Leaf, Quick, Epic Fial}
{Jamiet99uk, Lalendra, lucca261}
Definitely a bit firmer of a readlist than before. I want to brush Jamiet off as a noob!Town. But his play is just soo scummy. Like I don't know any other site that I have ever played on that would read his play as town. So I can't even say "Oh, it's the culture over there." Because I bet if I entered the site, it definitely isn't.
Also his bitching about the mod and replacements seems like he's trying to push the topic away from himself. Blaming it on the community when every mafia forum I used before this has always had a reserve list in case of site flakes or people taking on more than they can handle at the time. This is the first site where the game begins without a reserve list already made up that I've been to though. But that also means a lot of other sites are use to people replacing out or bailing as well. So his attitude is unneeded.
I think I'm just waiting to see some flips though before I can get into figuring this one out. There's a few ways it can go and I'm trying to do it where mafia are forced to out themselves.
Wtf is this shit? How is that possibly ai? And are you always this obsessed with your gut? Is it because you are up your own ass so far? I read through one of those games you boasted about, and you were freaking clueless. And in that game you were boating about yet another game where you caught Assemblerotws because of some dumb crumb thing. I bet you'll be telling your grandkids about it one day?
In short, this game is boring as shit. Let's fight! Have at you!
In post 482, CheekyTeeky wrote:Lol yes I have an air of crazed confidence/arrogance which I love about me
In post 487, CheekyTeeky wrote:No my playstyle almost always gets me lynched early, I do plan on working out why that is at some point.
In post 493, Awoo wrote:Because otherwise it's too obvious who's getting mason'd
In post 493, Jamiet99uk wrote:You are misreading my intentions. I'm not attempting to get Masoned. If I am not a Mason the Masons should definitely not attempt to Mason me. I would strongly discourage any such action!
In post 499, Maki Harukawa wrote:You know when I saw Awoo's post I was like *perks eyebrow* myself but I think it's so honest that scum doesn't need to say a line like that I don't think scum Awoo looks at that post and clicks submit
In post 504, Quick wrote:I am also starting to TR Jamie
In post 507, Awoo wrote:You know, I just taking a shower and I was thinking to myself "Wait a minute, in hindsight that post I just made was antitown as hell.
In post 515, Lalendra wrote:Sigh. I really don't want to townread Jamie after all that, but UNVOTE:
I already had some doubt, and his last few posts felt very Towny to me. And now I'm back at square one.
In post 573, Jamiet99uk wrote:purport
In post 580, Jamiet99uk wrote:Actually Quick has been intelligent enough to notice something that many of you have failed to grasp.
In post 583, lucca261 wrote:VOTE: CommKnight
In post 583, lucca261 wrote:Lalendra unvoting of Jamie feels off. her whole game feels off, like she's holding back something. i'm still expecting a big breakthrough from her slot.
In post 585, lucca261 wrote:question for you: what do you think of the end of Jamie being the hot wagon, going directly to Quick?
In post 663, Lalendra wrote:I don't really worry too much about level of content, lurking is NAI - life gets busy and I know I have lurked as both alignments. Active lurking/fluffposting is different imo. But I don't feel that's what I've been doing. You are obviously entitled to disagree.
In post 658, Jamiet99uk wrote:Anyone who strongly townreads CommKnight: Why? Do you like being shouted at? Do you enjoy bright colours?
In post 666, Quick wrote:Another D1 lynch, lovely.
In post 697, Chisa Yukizome wrote:UNVOTE: comm
In post 697, Chisa Yukizome wrote:for the record I am currently opposed to both comm and quick lynches
In post 699, CommKnight wrote:I suppose what to expect from Flubber, he got mislynched in that other game for bad pushes as well.
In post 701, CommKnight wrote:Yeah but your gut was shit that game too.
In post 716, Maki Harukawa wrote:This might be town v town...I like both of these guys last few days
UNVOTE:
In post 786, Lalendra wrote:It was clear to me that it was a response to me.
In post 798, Lalendra wrote:I would not be opposed to a Jamie wagon, I have thought his play was anti-town at best from the beginning (and if I'm being honest, the complaints about the site are wearing on me).
In post 795, CommKnight wrote:2.) Aubrey didn't know it wasn't the hammer vote (Aubrey, that looks very bad on you dude. I thought you were doing what I said in 1).
In post 808, Awoo wrote:Somewhat concerned about the general suspiscion heading her way, I think it's starting to snowball from my light suspicion way back and I don't think it's developing for natural reasons
In post 915, CommKnight wrote:Honestly, it's weird she was killed. Yes she had some big posts that were analytical but the kill doesn't make sense as it doesn't set anyone up objectively of being lynched.
In post 940, Quick wrote:In post 928, lucca261 wrote:why am I being voted again? doesn't matter, it's not happening.
let's go where we should've gone last day:
VOTE: Lalendra
---
I love how Lalendra and Awoo immediately accepted Comm sugestion, of lynching outside of the potential mislynches, never once stopping to think that Comm could've scum intentions to post that. That, combined with my prior suspicions about Lalendra, makes me sure that she should be the vote for today. And North was a probable member on a Lalendra wagon today, even if people does not associate this fact with North. If I'm suddenly not lazy, I might very well make a big case on her. But for this point, this is enough.
---
hey, Jamie, where's all your content? and was that a naked vote? a naked vote, jamie? we had discussions about that.
I'm not completely sold on Lalendra. I need more of a case than this. I will say that she isn't really explaining... well, anything really, but that's here meta IIRC. So give me something good and maybe I will consider it. I will say that I think Comm is either Scum or full of himself so there is no way I am going to sheep him on you.
In post 947, Quick wrote:Besides that, his whole theory on who is Scum is pretty much a shot in the dark because it doesn't really point to anyone specific except who he chose out of a hat if you are to believe he is being truthful when he voted for Lucca. Beyond that, pretty much everything he says is baseless and we shouldn't really just take him at his word because if you start just trusting gut then you lose every time you play against a decent Scum player who uses gut. It just does not make sense to listen to anything Comm says really.
In post 915, CommKnight wrote:Quick, Jamie, Awoo and Lale are off the table today as lynchables. (Myself included). I'm going to go ahead and say there's 1 scum in the group of 5 of us.
In post 1048, CommKnight wrote:It is only going stale because some people are completely missing from these conversations and only pop in to mention how dead it is. How about having something to say and saying it fully and help the game get going instead of being part of the problem?
In post 1058, CommKnight wrote:what scum pool would you have if you could only pick 3 people. Both minimum and maximum. No tunneling and no saying everyone is scum.
In post 1059, CommKnight wrote:1 scum in: <Flavor, Flubber>
1 scum in: <Maki, Lale>
1 scum in: <Chisa, Awoo, Epic>
In post 1105, CommKnight wrote:Quick (1): Flubbernugget
lucca261 (1): Lalendra
Flubbernugget (1): Quick
Lalendra (3): lucca261, Aubrey, Maki Harukawa
CommKnight (2): Epic Fial, Chisa Yukizome
Maki Harukawa (1): CommKnight
Chisa Yukizome (1): Flavor Leaf
Epic Fial (1): Not Known 15
Not voting:
^ This vote count is literally 1 page ago.
Quick (2): Flubbernugget, Lalendra
Flubbernugget (1): Quick
Lalendra (3): lucca261, Aubrey, Maki Harukawa
CommKnight (1): Epic Fial,
Maki Harukawa (1): CommKnight
Chisa Yukizome (1): Flavor Leaf
Epic Fial (1): Not Known 15
Not voting: Chisa Yukizome
In post 1112, lucca261 wrote:Aubrey and Maki are two of the towniest slots on the game. not happening.
In post 1112, lucca261 wrote:not sure if I like Aubrey posts on the start of this page, but we got to start to build townreads and he's currently voting with me so I'll let this pass.
In post 1156, Not Known 15 wrote:
This is scum trying to push a counter-wagon.
Horrid reasoning and excuse from both.
VOTE: Chisa Yukizome
Epic Fial and Chisa Yukizome are scum.
In post 468, Awoo wrote:Jamie is becoming a policy lynch.
A policy lynch that I support.
VOTE: jamiet99uk
Because otherwise it's too obvious who's getting mason'd, and that's bad. At least when we remove this from the game there is a good layer of ambiguity who the copshot lands on.
In post 1156, Not Known 15 wrote:Epic Fial and Chisa Yukizome are scum.
In post 1131, Not Known 15 wrote:I don't know why people are not voting Aubrey or Epic Fial. Especially Epic Fial.
In post 1104, Not Known 15 wrote:I might die tonight. If I do, please remember what I said about Epic Fial.
In post 1206, lucca261 wrote:how quickly he misdirected to Chisa her own suspicion.
In post 1430, Epic Fial wrote:Took me longer to get back to this than I expected. Looks like the thread has rurned into The MathBlade Show...
In post 1438, MathBlade wrote:And I don't care if you repeat someone else's points.
I want to see you convince me Flavor Leaf is scum to you.
In post 1296, Aubrey wrote:I could buy into being busy in RL for a window in time. I could buy into not being motivated for a window of time. Your window of time though has been a major portion of the game. furthermore, I don't buy that it was a planned decision to actively lurk in order to help you place players through reaction testing. Like the annoying math teachers in my old high school days, you need to show the work, and I'm not seeing it. The only thing I see, is you going after the first person to really call you out on anything for survival. <--- aka this reads more as "Oh shit time to push back on the fly" rather than "I've been collecting data on how people recieve me, and here are my results now that my wagon is generated"
In post 1302, MathBlade wrote:Townreads on aubrey and flavor leaf on the last page.
In post 1276, Flavor Leaf wrote:so I knew eventually if I kept doing pointless nonsensical things (i felt it was pretty obvious I was disassociated from this game) that scum somewhere would try to take advantage of it. I just had to sift through town seeing it as scummy, and scum taking the opportunity. People voting me gets me invested in the game, so now I’m here, and starting to see things.
In post 1290, Epic Fial wrote:
How about this one? If quick is town this must have been tempting for scum to hammer. Unless of course they were all on already. And we know awoo, lalendra and NSG were town. Leaving comm (again),
Flubber, and Aubrey. But we probably wouldn't get all three scum on the wagon, but likely at least one.
IF quick is town. But you're townreading quick, right comm?
In post 1293, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1291, Epic Fial wrote:In post 1276, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1275, CommKnight wrote:@Flavor, I'm sorta mixed on you. One hand, there's a high likelyhood you're scum (but if Flubber were to flip sucm then I'd reverse that read), but what do you think of Epic? Is he town in your eyes?
Unlike Quick, I think his case he is building on me is scum taking advantage of my lack of attentiveness to this game. I’m a reaction test player, so I knew eventually if I kept doing pointless nonsensical things (i felt it was pretty obvious I was disassociated from this game) that scum somewhere would try to take advantage of it. I just had to sift through town seeing it as scummy, and scum taking the opportunity. People voting me gets me invested in the game, so now I’m here, and starting to see things.
So on what basis are you doing this sorting? Sounds like an excuse to sort any way that helps your (probably scum) wincon...
So this is actually a Freudian slip. The way he phrased it, the helps my “probably scum” wincon means that in doing so, there’s the possibility of doing what I did to help out my town wincon as well, but that makes his entire argument moot and NAI in that sense because if you can see it being done either alignment, which the word, that one word probably, means he sees/knows that it is happening from a town perspective. He pushes it completely as scum reasoning yet contradicts himself directly due to having insider knowledge.
I don’t think most people would notice this, but for me that locks it in.
In post 1295, Flavor Leaf wrote:Well, I’m more analytical on this account. It’s hard to completely get rid of playstyles, and I reaction test in ways on all of them.
In post 1301, MathBlade wrote:No townie post of Comm's I have seen says. "So you don't agree with my posts?" You're scum.
In post 1314, MathBlade wrote:3) I see how it is. Don't address any of the points I have made and just call me horrendous.
In post 1328, MathBlade wrote:3) You're not actively pushing just sitting disengaged and going "waaaah Town sucks" and then actively saying people you townread suck
4) You're not interacting with the points just someone who doesn't do what you want sucks.
In post 1331, Flavor Leaf wrote:You’re right— it wasn’t actively planned, it’s just what happened.
In post 1335, CommKnight wrote:@Aubrey and Flubber. Get on Maki today. That will give us 4, then we just need a 5th person to vote. Give me a chance to actually get scum lynched today. You both know I've been constant with my reads throughout the game. ISO me if you have to again and look at my current suspects with who I've read earlier as scum. This is a game where I'm on the mark.
In post 1360, Maki Harukawa wrote:1v1ing you would be boring cause 1) I'd win 2) I don't sr you
In post 1380, MathBlade wrote:They...If you're gonna insist that I am scum or no longer lock Town simply because I scumread you get my pronoun right.
In post 1433, MathBlade wrote:Neither are you. Otherwise you'd either answer my question about your read on Comm Knight or admit you don't and then quit sheeping him as people don't sheep null reads.
In post 1443, Quick wrote:et's all do this:
Pick 4 you would lynch and 4 you would not.
In post 1454, MathBlade wrote:Mainly I haven't seen any "conviction" over why Flavor is scum moreso than anyone else here.
In post 1454, MathBlade wrote:A player being lazy or lurky may be truthful but unless you townread a majority of the game not seeing your reasons why Flavor Leaf has your vote compared to say Flubber or Quick.
In post 1455, MathBlade wrote:Long ass windedness for "lurking" is not acceptable on Day three.
In post 1460, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, yeah, they seem like decent reasons to vote me.
In post 1478, Flavor Leaf wrote:Aubrey is lock scum based on play and positioning
In post 1478, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m locking in right now as Aubrey, Maki, Chisa.
In post 1359, Maki Harukawa wrote:Talk to me on this because I can see flavor and Flub teammates why can't you?
In post 1482, Maki Harukawa wrote:Dam Flavor knows I most likely won't hammer him with flubber alive my hands are tied
In post 1491, Epic Fial wrote:Flavor, why are you locking in Chisa as scum when you were earlier so sure the Not Known nk was a frame job? For that matter, why are you voting me? Me and Chisa were NK's top suspects...
In post 1753, CommKnight wrote:I think we should start with Epic, then Aubrey, then Quick. Bang, bang, bang. 3 scum in a fucking row.
In post 1753, CommKnight wrote:He's not even interacting directly with me now that I've called out the team because he doesn't want to confirm my suspicions there by slipping up in any way.
In post 1784, MathBlade wrote:In post 783, Aubrey wrote:I'm going to be direct and somewhat cold about this. If I feel like you're scraping by, and your content isn't matching the norm in your catchups, and you say' "well life is busy" I straight up won't give a damn. I'm understanding to a busy schedule, holidays, and RL troubles but at some point your content has to fully make up and account for that lack of activity.
This doesn't just pertain to you but to everyone.
^^ Holds Aubrey to Aubrey’s standard.
In post 1962, CommKnight wrote:Aubrey, you and I are the partiers here apparently. Both Halloween and Christmas in this one game-span.
In post 1962, CommKnight wrote:Also now we got similar avatars. Hahaha.
In post 1962, CommKnight wrote:But seriously, I'm going to hate myself if I let you get a leg up on me this game as well. We're in a very similar situation as our last game except this time I'm currently voting your buddy. (Have been for days now). So he's fucked if Maki sees Epic as scum here.
In post 1980, Epic Fial wrote:In post 204, Aubrey wrote:In post 194, Epic Fial wrote:Maybe scum are lurking weebs in this game. Another possibility is that they are posting a lot but are not weebs. So I'm going to be considering both weebs and non-weebs, and people who are lurking and people doing the opposite of that, whatever it is called. On the other hand, they might be in the middle somewhere. Nearly certain we can hit scum in one of those groups.
Aubrey, did you see the crumbing here?