Mini Normal 1954: Iambic Tetramafia: Endgame

[skitter30]

Why?

[Dunkerdoodles]

skitter, flubber is absolutely, 100% confirmed scum right now.

not yet

[EspeciallyTheLies]

skitter, flubber is absolutely, 100% confirmed scum right now.

not yet

he's making shit up. no actual town role with loyal modifier would behave this way if he had a true guilty.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

and let's not pretend that mafia chose HIM to role lock if they had one.

[Dunkerdoodles]

well he can claim his role and we can see if it makes sense or not

[EspeciallyTheLies]

well he can claim his role and we can see if it makes sense or not

that's what i'm waiting for. he's stalling with BS.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

also flubber scum flip confirms awoo-town.

[Flubbernugget]

Skittles and dunkerdoodles are right

Enabler is also normal

There's an easier way to solve this. If jingle catches up on this and cc's me, we have a town for scum trade which is probably better than a potential clear anyway.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

which also means two of skitter, jingle and ironstove are the partners.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Skittles and dunkerdoodles are right

Enabler is also normal

There's an easier way to solve this. If jingle catches up on this and cc's me, we have a town for scum trade which is probably better than a potential clear anyway.

STOP STALLING. you claim a guilty on dunker with your vote but are too afraid to come out and actually say one way or the other.

YES. OR NO. DO YOU HAVE A GUILTY RESULT ON DUNKER?

[skitter30]

Yeah I'm not seeing confirmed scum yet. I'm seeing someone with a maybe-result who's being cagey, for possibly good reasons, so I can't make a judgement yet.

I don't get why we're all assuming he has a loyal modifier? And a loyal modifier can't give a hard-guilty. Only hard innos. And I can think of a couple of ways that he'd get a no-result with a loyal modifier that don't necessitate having been roleblocked.

I'm finding it odder that Dunker doesn't seem very concerned about the maybe-guilty Flubber has on him.

p-edit: you guys type fast. I want to see if Jingle cc's that variant spot, cuz then we have confirmed scum in that slot. That's why I'm not making a hard judgement on whether or not Flubber is telling the truth yet.

[skitter30]

*confirmed scum in those two slots

[Dunkerdoodles]

Skittles and dunkerdoodles are right

Enabler is also normal

There's an easier way to solve this. If jingle catches up on this and cc's me, we have a town for scum trade which is probably better than a potential clear anyway.

ok i'll vote you for this post alone
VOTE: flubber

[EspeciallyTheLies]

dude! what if both jingle and flubs are scum and he's trying to set up a supposed 1 v 1 where lynching one "clears" the other....

i've done that shit before

[EspeciallyTheLies]

i could see that

[skitter30]

I do admit that the thought has crossed my mind. But I want to see what Jingle says about all of this.

And I do think that Flubber needs to out what kind of result he has on Dunker, and if he's claiming a hard guilty or not.

[skitter30]

Skittles and dunkerdoodles are right

Enabler is also normal

There's an easier way to solve this. If jingle catches up on this and cc's me, we have a town for scum trade which is probably better than a potential clear anyway.

ok i'll vote you for this post alone
VOTE: flubber

Why? Suggesting we wait for Jingle to see this is like the most reasonable thing he's said. I do think he needs to elaborate on his result though.

also flubber scum flip confirms awoo-town.

Where are you getting this from?

which also means two of skitter, jingle and ironstove are the partners.

Or this?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

...you performed an investigation on one of the most townread slots?

1) no scum posts this to a partner who's faking a guilty.

2) check my reads list from the start of the day

[EspeciallyTheLies]

also, if flubber was actually town, where are the scum flocking to "jump on the easy target"?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

all i see is you defending him, skitter.

[skitter30]

...you performed an investigation on one of the most townread slots?

1) no scum posts this to a partner who's faking a guilty.

2) check my reads list from the start of the day

This makes sense; I hadn't made that connection.

also, if flubber was actually town, where are the scum flocking to "jump on the easy target"?

Do you mean that they'd be trying to jump on Flubber or Dunker here?

Either way, literally only you, me, Dunker, and Flubber have posted in the thread since Flubber (kinda) elaborated on his result an hour and a half ago, so we don't know how everyone else is going to react to this.

all i see is you defending him, skitter.

I don't think I'm defending him. I'm trying to find out if his info is a) trustworthy, b) actually a hard guilty on someone, c) made up, and/or d) in direct cc with someone else who's already softed. I don't think this can be resolved before flubber fully outs his result, and/or Jingle responds to this.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

fair enough.

[Flubbernugget]

The simplest answer to 593 is that dunkerdoodles is scum.

Either way, you should probably read 531 again. I said nothing about dunkerdoodles being an "easy target"

[EspeciallyTheLies]

The simplest answer to 593 is that dunkerdoodles is scum.

Either way, you should probably read 531 again. I said nothing about dunkerdoodles being an "easy target"

you. flubber. you would be the easy target. you're not even thinking like town... you're assuming dunker is the easy town target in this scenario... that makes zero sense if you supposedly have a guilty on him.

[skitter30]

also, if flubber was actually town, where are the scum flocking to "jump on the easy target"?

you. flubber. you would be the easy target.

you're not even thinking like town... you're assuming dunker is the easy town target in this scenario... that makes zero sense if you supposedly have a guilty on him.

How is this not what you're doing here?