DAMN. you called it before meIn post 298, northsidegal wrote:oh my gosh,In post 295, sheepsaysmeep wrote:VOTE: north there you goIn post 279, northsidegal wrote:if i had to place it i would probably put sheep as a slight scumlean for the unvote in 78 and how he hasn't placed it anywhere yetyousuck!
what exactly is scummy about an omgus vote? walk me through your thought process, ucv.UC Voyager wrote:one hell of a omgus!!!! AND IT IS PASSED RVS!!!!!!even if you are town, town isn't always right, so NSG could have been wrong!, but this seems scummy as hellIn post 295, sheepsaysmeep wrote:VOTE: north there you goIn post 279, northsidegal wrote:if i had to place it i would probably put sheep as a slight scumlean for the unvote in 78 and how he hasn't placed it anywhere yet
an OMGUS vote in RVS is one thing because everyone know it is a joke!In post 303, northsidegal wrote:thought process, ucv
It's more of a trust thing, as the last time I played against Trans, he was Mafia. There's not much difference between that game and the last game I played with him in, so I'm more inclined, based on my nature of playing with the guy, that he's more than likely Scum.In post 237, northsidegal wrote:explain this, please (the bold). what did you say in the beginning of the post that would indicate that he can't be trusted, town or not?In post 235, PMysterious wrote:
While this is counter-evidence, not only was it requested,but it also shows, that Trans can not be trusted, whether he is Town or not.Every game shown gives a showcase that Trans could be Town, Mafia, or third party. I'm getting some scum vibes, so I'm sticking with Trans as my option for the lynch. I'll look into the 50+ posts he made this game for more thoughts.
every game shows that he could be town, mafia or third party? erm, exactly what conclusion do you draw from that statement? that's true for everyone in the game and is a function of the random role assignments rather than a meta playstyle. if you're trying to say that this style of posting doesn't indicate that transcend is town, that's fine, but you've also just proven to yourself and to everyone else that it also doesn't indicate that he's mafia or third party. so what made you end up choosing scum over "it's non-alignment indicative"?
it may indicateIn post 304, UC Voyager wrote:an OMGUS vote in RVS is one thing because everyone know it is a joke!In post 303, northsidegal wrote:thought process, ucv
an OMGUS that is serious late day one is shity!
(assuming by "that game" you actually meant "this game")In post 305, PMysterious wrote:It's more of a trust thing, as the last time I played against Trans, he was Mafia. There's not much difference between that game and the last game I played with him in, so I'm more inclined, based on my nature of playing with the guy, that he's more than likely Scum.In post 237, northsidegal wrote:explain this, please (the bold). what did you say in the beginning of the post that would indicate that he can't be trusted, town or not?In post 235, PMysterious wrote:
While this is counter-evidence, not only was it requested,but it also shows, that Trans can not be trusted, whether he is Town or not.Every game shown gives a showcase that Trans could be Town, Mafia, or third party. I'm getting some scum vibes, so I'm sticking with Trans as my option for the lynch. I'll look into the 50+ posts he made this game for more thoughts.
every game shows that he could be town, mafia or third party? erm, exactly what conclusion do you draw from that statement? that's true for everyone in the game and is a function of the random role assignments rather than a meta playstyle. if you're trying to say that this style of posting doesn't indicate that transcend is town, that's fine, but you've also just proven to yourself and to everyone else that it also doesn't indicate that he's mafia or third party. so what made you end up choosing scum over "it's non-alignment indicative"?
It is the end of Day 1. You should beIn post 272, Gödel wrote:I don't have enough to go on for now that I have a player that I am sure enough as scum, i do have some leans though nm for his trolling play style I have seen this from him in the past as scum. I also don't like some of UCs posts, not the beginning ones where she tried to(or not) play the newbie card how it seems like she keeps on referencing other games(or something the like) and not really engaging. I think NSD and A50 are town cus the interaction felt TvT. and the rest is still ambiguous.
I'd be surprised if North faked that post as scum. (sorry North)Transcend wrote:279 is a scumclaim
reallysheepsaysmeep wrote:VOTE: north there you goIn post 279, northsidegal wrote:if i had to place it i would probably put sheep as a slight scumlean for the unvote in 78 and how he hasn't placed it anywhere yet
Cuz you do. How much more should I explain it to you? Your play simply doesn't look like serving any purpose except for getting by. No real scum hunting, no real arguments, and not even the "intimidating" trolling you used in Real Folks Blues. I mean, you were trolling there too, but it was kind of reckless as if you didn't care if you pissed the whole lot. You're not doing that here either. You're being too careful yet totally unproductive.In post 311, Transcend wrote:why me?
Then do somethingIn post 313, Transcend wrote:maybe you should stop metaing me because i promise you it's not gonna be a good idea
Not if you don't give proper reasoning behind your vote. You said you voted her on page 1 (which is true) but then the reason I'm voting her could not be yours as she didn't defend you on page 1.In post 315, Transcend wrote:well i'm voting someone you sus and i've been voting her since page 1 of this game
does that not qualify as doing something?
I'd be interested in knowing how you distinguish between these two things, and having you provide some quotes or something to explain because I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion.In post 310, Almost50 wrote:What's not is someone acting not only as if they're not convinced but rather as of hey were certain that Transcend will flip town.
VOTE: porkensIn post 323, Porkens wrote:Hi KeychainIn post 320, Keychain wrote:Welcome, Porkens!Nice to see you!
Vote: UC Voyager