Mini Normal 1961 - Game Over

[Impede]

policy daykill: Kokichi Oma

Quote for effect

Why?

for effect

[Nero Cain]

VOTE: vote:Impede

for effect

[Kokichi Oma]

VOTE: Kokichi Oma

VOTE: Lapsa

[Lord Gurgi]

VOTE: Kokichi Oma

VOTE: Lapsa

Vote confirmed. Choo choo.

[Dunkerdoodles]

VC 1.1

Vote Count 1.1

There are 13 players alive, it takes 7 votes for a lynch

(2) Kokochi Oma:

Lapsa, Lord Gurgi

(1) Sunlit Diamond:

Impede

(1) A Simple Plan:

Sunlit Diamond

(1) Impede:

Nero Cain

(1) Shinobi:

Assemblerotws

(1) Flavor Leaf:

Mozamis

(1) Bory:

Northsidegal

(1) Lapsa:

Kokichi Oma

Not Voting:

Everyone else

Mod Notes: Is this mod color ok? I've been told it's hard to read in some themes.

Would this be better?

Day ends in (expired on 2017-11-16 21:25:00)

[Assemblerotws]

That mod color looks fine to me.

[Kokichi Oma]

Both work.

[Sunlit Diamond]

I changed back to mafblack so either works for me.

Work has been killing me today, be back tonight.

[Kokichi Oma]

So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.

[Lord Gurgi]

The darker blue is preferable. I'm in sepia and often further redden my screen. The teal is difficult to read.

I think Kokichi is scum. Reading opportunism into a vote against them on page 1.

[northsidegal]

So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.

opportunistic in what way?

VOTE: kokichi

[Kokichi Oma]

Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.

[northsidegal]

Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.

how does that make it opportunistic, or scummy? other people did the same thing or something similar, would you say the same thing about them?

[Kokichi Oma]

The darker blue is preferable. I'm in sepia and often further redden my screen. The teal is difficult to read.

I think Kokichi is scum. Reading opportunism into a vote against them on page 1.

Why would I wait to look into things?

[Kokichi Oma]

Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.

how does that make it opportunistic, or scummy? other people did the same thing or something similar, would you say the same thing about them?

Nero's vote didn't seem fabricated to me. And his was the second vote. Soooo~

[northsidegal]

The darker blue is preferable. I'm in sepia and often further redden my screen. The teal is difficult to read.

I think Kokichi is scum. Reading opportunism into a vote against them on page 1.

Why would I wait to look into things?

why would you look into something that likely doesn't have a lot of meaning behind it? why look into only the vote on yourself, specifically?

[Impede]

Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.

how does that make it opportunistic, or scummy? other people did the same thing or something similar, would you say the same thing about them?

Nero's vote didn't seem fabricated to me. And his was the second vote. Soooo~

Did you neglect to read your first post? You basically baited everyone in this entire game. If anyone is sus, I'd be more inclined to think it's you.

[Kokichi Oma]

Why not? I'm trying to get the game going. And guess what? It's working~

[Kokichi Oma]

Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.

how does that make it opportunistic, or scummy? other people did the same thing or something similar, would you say the same thing about them?

Nero's vote didn't seem fabricated to me. And his was the second vote. Soooo~

Did you neglect to read your first post? You basically baited everyone in this entire game. If anyone is sus, I'd be more inclined to think it's you.

So baiting people to see their reactions is scummy? Got it.

[Impede]

So baiting people to see their reactions is scummy? Got it.

Why would scum react to that post???

"Oh ok, sounds good Kokichi. Thank you for the heads up!"

[Kokichi Oma]

Why not?

[Kokichi Oma]

I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.

[Lord Gurgi]

So baiting people to see their reactions is scummy? Got it.

Things that are scummy:

1. Deliberately playing in a scummy way
   
2. Defending the above as "baiting"

My vote feels comfy.

[northsidegal]

Why not? I'm trying to get the game going. And guess what? It's working~

i think it's an artifical way to get the game out of rvs, like people who self vote just so they can have the conversation about why self-voting in rvs isn't scummy. you're trying to force the game out of the low-information stage without providing any meaningful information to do so. yeah, saying "i'm scum" in rvs is certain to get people to react which generates content, but is that content really meaningful? what exactly have you gained from this endeavor? what i'm seeing from it are exactly the kind of weak conclusions that i would expect from the kind of content that claiming scum generates - voting someone just because they voted you.

[Impede]

I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.

Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.

I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.