Rereading BTD now. I thought he’d subbed in, didn’t realize he was here from the start.
383 The slight scumread on Cheeky without a vote reminds me a bit of Chip’s reluctance to put a vote down. Maybe scum wanted to avoid making enemies. Still seems like on odd catch up in terms of what it’s lacking. Doesn’t take any particularly strong stances until 507, but explains why.
As I said before, the contradiction hunting stuff makes sense on the assumption BTD missed Cheeky’s sub out/back in thing. Looking back, it seems slightly weird he’d have missed it given his Cheeky interaction. Plus I don’t like that I had to ask him to respond several times.
Still don’t see the problem with the votecount where BTD/Chip are the only ones not voting. This makes BTD less likely scum imo since they had opportunity and incentive to form a counterwagon if both scum, and didn’t.
808 I didn’t/still don’t like how quick BTD was to clear Cheeky. It seems like he automatically assumed there’d been what would have effectively been a severe mod error (clearing a slot), so I don’t see why he has a problem with Micc asking for clarification- since that seemed fully reasonable.
UC dying kind of helps BTD since UC was voting/fully pushing BTD. Still doesn’t seem optimal though.
Main reason is still Chip being somewhat defensive of BTD, and BTD not talking much about chip and not voting him in the end, which seems more likely than a bus in this setup.
As an unrelated point, the action policy is even worse than I thought.
‘Additionally, if an ignite were win the game, there would be no die roll.’
Since scum shouldn’t know an ignite would win the game.
