Mini Normal 1950 [Engame: Mafia Victory!]
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
I disagree with this; if UC is scum, what would he have to gain from calling someone who openly townreads him 'scum' this early in the game?In post 83, Vanderscamp wrote:
I think you're more likely to be town now because I would have expected scumYou to take the easy and expected route and call necro scum.In post 73, UC Voyager wrote:ima be honest. here is what im feeling
town
me (duh.)
Necro
CheekyTeeky
Zulph
Morality
Wave Mode
mafia
Rhah
??????'
????? (possibly. idk. might be 3)
???????? (probably not 4 lol)
Talk about unnecessary conflict.
Would scum-UC play the trick of pretending not to know how many scum there are?In post 84, Vanderscamp wrote:I'm also in lines to believe the dumbtell about not knowing the number of scum.
Judging from his posts so far I'd give that a resounding 'yes.'- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Were you 'joking' when you made out you didn't know how many scum were in the game?In post 90, UC Voyager wrote:
im sorry..im still in RVS......im new to beginning....i have always been a replacement for half way through day one or past day one...so it is all new to me. i will try to be more On Topic.....and less "silly" or jokingIn post 88, Luca Blight wrote:He's either going to be silly Town or silly scum, either way he'll be a nightmare to read.
The 'possibly 3 scum, probably not 4 lol' thing felt a bit contrived, though.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Your wording is quite unclear.In post 93, UC Voyager wrote:
i wasn't trying to seem like i was acting like i didn't know how many scum there were. i dont, but i wsn't trying to look scummy.In post 91, Luca Blight wrote:
Were you 'joking' when you made out you didn't know how many scum were in the game?In post 90, UC Voyager wrote:
im sorry..im still in RVS......im new to beginning....i have always been a replacement for half way through day one or past day one...so it is all new to me. i will try to be more On Topic.....and less "silly" or jokingIn post 88, Luca Blight wrote:He's either going to be silly Town or silly scum, either way he'll be a nightmare to read.
The 'possibly 3 scum, probably not 4 lol' thing felt a bit contrived, though.
@mod vote count
Were you genuinely unaware of the setup or were you joking?- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
1) Why are you 'In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.not a fan'?
2) Why mention you're not a fan if your intention is to 'keep it close to the vest for now'?- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
You're completely taking away the context and putting in its place a generic statement.In post 112, Rhah wrote:
Well... both of your assumptions are sort of surface level in a way. The mafia can't be afraid of conflict anyway, given that their nature is to drive mislynches. This post gives me scum vibes on Luca. I would say I'm getting that vibe from his tone, as well. To be determined.In post 86, Luca Blight wrote:
I disagree with this; if UC is scum, what would he have to gain from calling someone who openly townreads him 'scum' this early in the game?In post 83, Vanderscamp wrote:
I think you're more likely to be town now because I would have expected scumYou to take the easy and expected route and call necro scum.In post 73, UC Voyager wrote:ima be honest. here is what im feeling
town
me (duh.)
Necro
CheekyTeeky
Zulph
Morality
Wave Mode
mafia
Rhah
??????'
????? (possibly. idk. might be 3)
???????? (probably not 4 lol)
Talk about unnecessary conflict.
Yes, scum may need to be prepared for conflict at times, but they certainly need to choose their battles and it makes little sense to attack someone who townreads them early doors. To bring this back to its origin - the point was that UC not calling Necro scum doesn't give him any Townie points, in my opinion.
In what way does that post give you 'scumvibes', apart from you completely missing/ignoring the point of it? As for scumreading for the tone - that's obviously just a cop-out due to not having any valid reason to back up your 'suspicion', which in itself is really just an excuse for a possible future wagon-jump.
I find it hilarious when people try to use this reason for a scumread - it's something that can neither be proven nor denied and is just worthless.
Any reason you ignored my questions in 106?In post 113, ChaosOmega wrote:
I misread peeks as a shorthand for Cheeky.In post 112, Rhah wrote:
I would like for you to tell me to tell me what is not true. Your first post is a naked vote and then you proceed to... talk about peeks. In what way is my observation dishonest? Also, this being the second thing you decide to post in the game thread strikes me a certain way. It's not a good feeling. Nevermind that you actually accompany your post with a vote on me.In post 102, ChaosOmega wrote:
Well that's not true at all. I voted them and suggested a claiming strategy unrelated to Cheeky.In post 56, Rhah wrote:Oh yeah. Found it interesting how Chaos opens up with just talking about peeks.
VOTE: Rhah
-----
Not a fan of Luca right now either; going to keep that close to the vest for now.
UNVOTE: Rhah
Alright, now that I can actually read what you're saying, let's try this dialogue again. Why would you find it interesting that I only talked about setup strategy with my first post given that the only other things posted were greetings and random votes?- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
In post 119, wavemode wrote:
I disdisagreeIn post 86, Luca Blight wrote:I disagree with this; if UC is scum, what would he have to gain from calling someone who openly townreads him 'scum' this early in the game?
Talk about unnecessary conflict.
Scum don't think so rigidly
If scum feels he can make a case on someone then he will push, townread be damned
Obviously it depends on individual play style.
My point was UC not scumreading Necro doesn't necessarily give UC Town points (which was what Vanders was saying), as there is a valid reason for why he wouldn't 'scum read' him in this situation if UC was scum himself.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Spoiler:
I don't like Chaos' opening so far. He enters just by suggesting the strategy regarding the vanilla cop (which to me seems as though it'd be as much benefit to scum as Town) and then disappears, not posting anything until called out on it by Rhah in 56.
His voting of Rhah, even if Rhah was actually talking about Cheeky instead of 'peeks', is weak/strange. He doesn't try to clear matters up with Rhah or try to understand why he saw his post in that light. It just feels like a defensive vote.
In all three posts he hasn't given a single read or idea, other than his setup 'strategy'. It seems a contrived opening the way he plants the seed of that idea and then disappears.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chaos- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Oh yeah - I forgot to say Chaos' only read was saying he's 'not a fan' of me, but gives no explanation and says he wants to 'keep it close to the vest for now' which is weird as why even mention it if he intends to do that?
He also ignored my questions regarding this in 106, but that may or may not have been deliberate on his part.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
Why did you deliberately ignore my questions?In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:VOTE: Luca Blight
It was.In post 215, Luca Blight wrote:He also ignored my questions regarding this in 106, but that may or may not have been deliberate on his part.
Ok...substitute 'call you out' for 'drew attention to' then?In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:
Weird, you had no comment on my idea until after I said you were scummy and there was more support for scumreading me, and then you thought it was bad. And Rhah didn't call out shit, he said it was "interesting". Really putting my feet to the fire there.In post 214, Luca Blight wrote:I don't like Chaos' opening so far. He enters just by suggesting the strategy regarding the vanilla cop (which to me seems as though it'd be as much benefit to scum as Town) and then disappears, not posting anything until called out on it by Rhah in 56.
Yes, I realised that you misunderstood him as I mentioned in the bit you quoted.In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:
Defensive vote? Lol. Do you honestly think I felt threatened by his 56? I've been here a while, it's gonna take a little more than that to put me on the defensive. I didn't try to clear it up with Rhah because I don't give a shit what he thinks of my strategy. I misread his "peeks" as a nickname for Cheeky; I thought he was commenting on my vote, which I thought was suspicious given other people had voted for Cheeky but he singled out me. When I realized what he meant, I then started to engage him on the point I just talked about in my previous post that Vanderscamp got to first.In post 214, Luca Blight wrote:His voting of Rhah, even if Rhah was actually talking about Cheeky instead of 'peeks', is weak/strange. He doesn't try to clear matters up with Rhah or try to understand why he saw his post in that light. It just feels like a defensive vote.
If you don't care about what people think of your strategy, why ask people what they think of your strategy? And the 'clearing up' bit was not even in regards to that - you thought his comment was about Cheeky, so why wouldn't you clear that up before voting? Do you vote everyone who disagrees with you?
Err yeah, hence the 'I forgot'....In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:In post 214, Luca Blight wrote:In all three posts he hasn't given a single read or idea, other than his setup 'strategy'.
#contradiction!!!!1111313421In post 215, Luca Blight wrote:Oh yeah - I forgot to say Chaos' only read was saying he's 'not a fan' of me
I've really got you riled here, haven't I? At least we're seeing something from you now, unlike earlier.
Well how would you expect someone to react when you suspect them but withhold the reason?In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:
Hmm, why would a player post something about another player in a game where they are trying to discern someone's alignment? Gosh, I'm just not sure. Maybe they're looking to see how they'll react?In post 215, Luca Blight wrote:but gives no explanation and says he wants to 'keep it close to the vest for now' which is weird as why even mention it if he intends to do that?
What is your reason for 'keeping it close to the vest'? Because to me, that approach would only work if the other player wasn't made aware he was suspected.
Bolded - 'In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:Let's get into how you reacted. You focused on it a lot given that I didn't explain it at all and it didn't really garner any support. Scum care more about how people see them than town. Why did it matter to you that much? You weren't in danger of being the lynch.
Also, the attacks on UC Voyager don't look great.Focused on it a lot' - I asked a simple question as to why, which you deliberately ignored, and so I ISO'd you and saw you'd done literally nothing else all game but suggest your theory regarding the cop, which lead to my vote.
Why did it matter to me so much? Because I want to understand the perspective behind your scumread. You're basically calling me scum for questioning why I'm being scumread by someone for no apparent reason, which is ridiculous.
Underlined - I did notattackUC. Not even once.
Haha, being criticised for not 'In post 230, ChaosOmega wrote:
This feels like you're laying the foundation of why you were on his wagon if he flips town. And it also feels like you keep focusing on the number of scum thing, like a lot.In post 88, Luca Blight wrote:He's either going to be silly Town or silly scum, either way he'll be a nightmare to read.
The 'possibly 3 scum, probably not 4 lol' thing felt a bit contrived, though.
Spoiler: like a lot
It reads like attacking a VI by harping on a weird thing they said instead of engaging the rest of the game and scumhunting.engaging the rest of the game and scumhunting' by someone who isn't engaging the rest of the game and scumhunting. Classic irony.
Regarding UV - I was just trying to clear up whether he was joking or not about not knowing the setup - his inital reply was unclear so I asked again, and when I understood his second answer I moved on.
If I was really just 'attacking the VI and not scumhunting' as you're accusing me of, why did I make my case against you and not him? It kind of contradicts what you say.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
You really are missing the point if you think I was Townreading UC for not calling Necro scum - I was doing the opposite as I explained in 211. It was Vanders who was doing as you described.In post 224, Rhah wrote: No, I'm not.
Okay, here's the thing. What I said and what you said don't conflict nor did I miss anything. wavemode basically said it: Scum will make not-optimal plays or ones they shouldn't simply because they arefreeto. It means they can and will do things that they shouldn't, so townreading people for doing things that aren't difficult and don't make a lot of sense as scum is arbitrary. That was the point. Your example of UC not calling necro scum is the same point. What's hilarious to me is that the bold is quite obviously you doing what you're accusing me of doing in the same sentence, to anyone that can read. Literally all of that has no value. You're setting up a mafia narrative and motivation for my actions with regard to you and at the same time your read on me enables you to join my wagon at a future point if you desire.
It really is a cop-out unless you can at least provide some substance for what you're talking about.In post 276, Rhah wrote:I talk about Luca in 224. That's the only engagement we've had directly. Otherwise I have a scumread on him for his tone which is a "cop-out read", apparently.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
If someone votes you in Mylo they are entering into a 1v1 - his ridiculously rash vote was a scum claim.In post 1957, Transcend wrote:well yeah necro was kinda obvtown and your omgus on him was a scumclaim
but i think necro was a bit reckless.- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Luca Blight
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
- Luca Blight
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight
- Luca Blight