Your voting system. What??

[mhsmith0]

Like
MU I think has a great way for going about it since their deadlines are usually 36hours/12hours

• Plurality Lynch
  
• No Majority
  
• Votes locked in LyLo
  
• Tied votes will result in a player being lynched at random from among the tied players.

I might be missing one

FWIW, minor correction: typically MU has plurality lynch with majority option and lylo vote lock (I actually like LYLO vote lock, since it makes votes more meaningful and gets rid of the gimmick vote/unvote sort of thing that people sometimes like to mess around with)

What that means in practice is that people CAN hammer a lynch early, but if they don't, then the largest wagon eats it.

That's neither better nor worse, just different.

[mhsmith0]

It's especially amusing to see "omg you'd totally townread me if you were town", even more so when directed at players who aren't even competent as town

[mhsmith0]

Idk I think this site has way more of a problem with too many people trying to lead the town and not accepting anyone elses reads than the opposite.

Realtalk though, I definitely agree on this front. As players have regrettably come to rely more on meta, you see a lot of head butting about who can read X better.

It's actually kind of funny that I have the exact opposite problem, and tend to be far too passive most of the time as town, even when my reads are actually quite good (on the whole, I'm far from perfect at reads but am overall pretty solidly >rand I think). Something I keep trying to work on but for whatever reason (probably at least somewhat due to my own personality) it often doesn't really take *shrugs*