Open 67 Two of Four (a7) Over! before 578
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
I meant mozsuggs.Thorbjorn wrote:
By that do you mean Lowell is your number one town suspect, or mozsuggs is?Lowell wrote:
I like this guy. He's my number 1 town suspect at the moment.mozsuggs wrote:And, to look even more scummy, lets straight away try and get another band wagon going
VOTE LOWELL
FTR, I don't think putting someone at lynch -1 early on D1 matters. I'm more skeptical of those who throw up their arms and scream about it than those who do it.- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
Uh, okay. Um, congrats.Thorbjorn wrote:
I'd agree with that except for the fat that I'm in a game currently where on the first day, someone got put at L-1 and a random townie waltzed in and hammered before anyone could react. Albeit, we did hit scum, but it left us completely without leads on day 2.Lowell wrote:FTR, I don't think putting someone at lynch -1 early on D1 matters. I'm more skeptical of those who throw up their arms and scream about it than those who do it.
You could probably count the number of times that's happened on one hand, wheras the "OMG you put him at L-1 OMGOMGOMG!!" happens... every time.- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
Thusfar:
8- mozsuggs puts 3rd vote on farside
10- DocJimmy votes mozuggs for said vote
11- farside questions mozsuggs
13- mozsuggs apologizes, votes Lowell
15- Lowell declares moz town for being gutsy
21- thorbjorn disagrees, cites some random other game
28- Near votes farside for not voting
30- Erratus votes Lowell
31- Lowell explains post 15
32- Thor again respectfully disagrees
35- farside votes Near for hypocrisy (complaining about not voting while not voting)
36- Near confirms vote on farside
38- Erratus questions Near for strange tactic
40s- argument between Near and farside rages
46- Lowell thinks both might be town
58- moz returns, votes erratus for being "balanced" [?]
59- DocJimmy joins Near/farside argument on Near's side
62- moz explains "balanced" = "cautious"
63- thorb votes moz
65- erratus defends himself, votes farside for being overly worried about a quicklynch
74- Near unvotes, votes DocJimmy for bandwaggoning
81- Erratus unvotes, votes Lowell
Some thoughts:
Erratus Apathos-Unsure. Easily the hardest player to read. Part of me wants to agree with moz's assessment that he's playing too "cautiously", but the other part of me thinks that makes no sense.
mozsuggs-TOWN. Both post 8 and posts 58-62 by moz are a bit reckless. However, I believe his recklessness to be genuine. And while he explained his vote in 58 awkwardly, I actually do agree with the reasoning.
Thorbjorn-SCUMMY. Posts 21 and 63 don't sit well with me. In post 21 he cites a random other game to "prove" that putting someone at L-1 is dangerous. This just seems off, like a post facto scramble to justify his positions. Post 63 is opportunistic as hell. He sort of politely slides in and votes for a bizairrely behaving Moz.
farside22-TOWN. Post 35 sparks a weird discussion about voting between she and near. I think farside has the losing side of this argument, but I do beleive her belief in it is genuine. She's posted a lot and yet I don't have any particular suspicion of her. Hence town.
DoctorJimmy-SCUM. Mostly it is his behavior during the P2 near/farside debate that puts him here. He looks like he's trying to foment further discussion while making a bit of a friend in Near. Also, he was quick to chastise and vote moz in post 10.
Near- I had him in the scum category until he turned on DocJimmy in post 74. I'll put him asunsure.
unvote, vote DocJimmy- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Lowell
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Lowell
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell
- Lowell