Open 702: Vanilla Nightless Game Over

[cytheflyguy]

Oh yeah

@Mod: I'm going to be V/LA until the 17th

[Luca Blight]

Lucky or Zaraki is being lynched today. Everyone should vote one or the other.

Votes on Sesq are also acceptable.

[Impede]

Well shit lol. I kinda pitty scum, that was....sad.

This is deliciously lynchable.

[Lucky2u]

Kind of lazy here atm. We got Zulfy, and I'm more of a lynch because obvscum was obvscum? My main point in not lynching him was that it was pretty much PL with his activity level. I stand by that, I don't do PL. I even mentioned that if he kept delaying with pointless posts that we should lynch him. He did pretty much what I said I'd lynch him for.

eh.... at this point how does town lose this? I feel like arguing against my lynch is just justifying why I should be one of the town that end games for the victory. A win is a win. Zaraki vs me Luca? ok let's do this!

VOTE: Zaraki

For a quicker victory, let's not lynch Lucky!

[MathBlade]

Oh yeah

@Mod: I'm going to be V/LA until the 17th

Acknowledged.

[MathBlade]

Votecount 4.27

Lucky2u(3)

~ Impede, CommKnight, Luca Blight

Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez(1)

~ Lucky2u

CultOfAthena(1)

~ Sesq


Not Voting (4): cytheflyguy, CultOfAthena, mozamis, Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
Day 4 deadline is in (expired on 2017-12-19 07:00:00)

FLAVOR

This is an automated vote count generated by a tool written by MathBlade. It goes much smoother with exact votes but will try to detect bold votes and misspellings. If you have issues during this beta, please get MathBlade.

Performed 45 calls in 110 seconds. With an average of 2.46164444444444 seconds per call.

Mod Notes

Cytheflyguy V/LA til 17th

[Impede]

Oh and I forgot he voted for zulfy and cy yesterday. As I've stated, I'm against the low activity PL. However if they keep prod dodging instead of replacing out, I'll concede to it being scum motivated.

Reread Lucky's ISO. Dude is scum. If he flips red, both Cy and Sesq are great lynches. Probably in that order. If not, Zaraki is appealing, but things get complicated...

[Lucky2u]

Yes, you've quoted my exact reasoning why I ended up for voting zulfy. I said I'd do something and I did it.

[Impede]

Normally slots like that where you're not able to attain an educated read are best to get rid of

before a MYLO situation arises

ASAP.

There, I fixed it for you.

The later we get into this game, the more we are hurt by having nullreads and a shrinking number of allowed MLs. Best to keep content-generating players generating content because they are easier to sort. Players like Zulfy are the reason the term Policy Lynch was created. It's literally a win-win and I challenge anyone to disagree with me.

You don't find this compelling rationale for policy lynching?

[Sesq]

Well shit lol. I kinda pitty scum, that was....sad.

This is deliciously lynchable.

it might just be so scum that it's town again

someone sell me on zaraki please. help me see the light

lucky too, i dont think i entirely understand him

[Lucky2u]

Was that directed at me impede?

[Impede]

Yes Lucky.

[mozamis]

The way both zaraki and lucky are being banded around without much objection is worrying.
Lucky is town. And zraki...maybe he's lynch bait.
Sesq is really worrying. She still isnt the player i played with before, some real wishy washy stuff about "sell m eon lucky amd zaraki" - what happened to her Cult scum read?

I'm probably most up for up Cyfly and Sesq now.
@ Luca - you'r estill my strongest townread, how do you feel abotu Sesq lynch?

[mozamis]

no fuck sesq is town

[mozamis]

VOTE: cyfly

[mozamis]

fuck it, i'm probably just over thinking it. I'm up for Zarki as well.

[Luca Blight]

Just lynch Lucky today.

[CommKnight]

Yeah, Moz isn't really my TR, he's Luca's TR. But Athena is my TR so it's all good. We're pushing Lucky today.

[Sesq]

The way both zaraki and lucky are being banded around without much objection is worrying.
Lucky is town. And zraki...maybe he's lynch bait.
Sesq is really worrying. She still isnt the player i played with before, some real wishy washy stuff about "sell m eon lucky amd zaraki" - what happened to her Cult scum read?

I'm probably most up for up Cyfly and Sesq now.
@ Luca - you'r estill my strongest townread, how do you feel abotu Sesq lynch?

i still scumread cult and have them voted. i just dont have any new information.

just think once before you speak please.

here's where i am on lucky right now:

he was kinda fucky early day 1 with regard to... impede it was? i have no idea. some shit. and then the recent hammer was pretty terrible. what else?

[Sesq]

gut says yes and his defense makes me feel weird

[CultOfAthena]

Sesq is really worrying. She still isnt the player i played with before, some real wishy washy stuff about "sell m eon lucky amd zaraki" -

what happened to her Cult scum read?

Definitely agreed, here. For the player who's hard tunneled me for maybe more than half of the game now, the recent change in behavior is quite the disparity.


In contrast to my usual style I think I'll be agreeing with a consensus lynch today. I think we're at the point where we can just start getting flips and look back through the entire thread with more and more information.

VOTE: Lucky

[Sesq]

i can't tell if you fell for that because you're scum or because you're otherwise mentally compromised.

[Luca Blight]

Somebody hammer. Let's keep this game flowing.

[Sesq]

ok ok, fine

VOTE: lucky

[MathBlade]

Votecount 4.28

Lucky2u(5)

~ Impede, CommKnight, Luca Blight, CultOfAthena, Sesq

-- HAMMER

Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez(1)

~ Lucky2u

cytheflyguy(1)

~

mozamis

Not Voting (

2

): cytheflyguy, Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
Day 4 deadline is in (expired on 2017-12-19 07:00:00)

FLAVOR

This is an automated vote count generated by a tool written by MathBlade. It goes much smoother with exact votes but will try to detect bold votes and misspellings. If you have issues during this beta, please get MathBlade.

Performed 46 calls in 12 seconds. With an average of 0.272847826086957 seconds per call.

Editing votecount number first time, improperly detected vote the second