thanks for not giving any reads, and just casting shade.(on who anyway lol)In post 117, Gamma Emerald wrote:My scumfuck sense is tingling
happy to lynch gamma, lets go.
thanks for not giving any reads, and just casting shade.(on who anyway lol)In post 117, Gamma Emerald wrote:My scumfuck sense is tingling
Mhmm... welll... probability for dice works that way (1/6) * (1/6), but cards are different. Assuming you put the card aside/bottom/anything but reshuffle the deck. It's (1/52) * (1/51) Which is how probability will work in this game. Right now, hitting randomly has a 4/13 chance of hitting scum. Masons have a 4/9 chance of hitting scum. As the game goes on, the numerator only decreases with each scum lynch, while the denominator decreases with every lynch because there's 1 less player each time.In post 162, Hongzi wrote: but I did remember that probabilities are multiplicative in sequence. The probability of me drawing the Ace of Spades from a standard card deck and then the Four of Clubs is (1/52) * (1/52), not (2/52).
In post 119, Almost50 wrote:Does Comm fake confidence as Town when he's not sure?
Yeah, I think I'm leaning towards Town!Moz. Town /=right though, and I don't want to push Gamma too hard before he had time to readjust and form some reads.In post 184, TwoInAMillion wrote:Mozamis looks more town now, i like his logic for the most part.
Who says gaining attention is anti-town behaviour? It's commonly considered a town!tell, and at worst NAI (it is NAI for me bc it's NAI for me, if you get the pun)In post 186, TwoInAMillion wrote:I don't think anyone who signs up for a mafia game should want to replace out within the first 10 pages, if at all, so it seems like he was trying to gain attention on purpose to me, which seems anti-town.
I only need to point at how some others already are reading me. I misunderstood something of the set-up and my plan was flawed based on that. At least I tried to solve it and it probably generated the most discussion so far this game.In post 185, Almost50 wrote:@Com:
Here's a tricky one: How would you read your own play so far if you didn't know your alignment and assuming you were someone else reading your posts?
I was saying I suspected someone without telling them I suspected them specifically. I was referring to Hongzi going softball on TIAM. I'm also not a fan of him just voting me without precedent.In post 175, mozamis wrote:thanks for not giving any reads, and just casting shade.(on who anyway lol)In post 117, Gamma Emerald wrote:My scumfuck sense is tingling
happy to lynch gamma, lets go.
i was in a game very recently where scum threatened to replace out. The replace out threat/replace out/ragequit is NAI, seen it both ways.In post 185, Almost50 wrote:Would it not have been more convenient for Scum!Gamma to fake some reads or something, rather than expressing his frustration in the manner he did?