Pikmin Mafia - Game over

[Flameaxe]

confirm

[Flameaxe]

Vote: UA

I love me some day one wagons.

[Flameaxe]

HAHA...Don't get your panties in a bunch just yet.

You pikmins

are way too uptight. No wonder mod called you stupid.

Why would you refer to us as you pikmins GS? Slip up?

[Flameaxe]

good god

the logic in this game is already awful

[Flameaxe]

Unvote, vote zombieslayer

Mhmm...

Kison be less dumb, please.

[Flameaxe]

UA has self-voted in, iirc, every game we've been in together. All you relatively new players: Go look up Team Asshat in the wiki. If someone's on that list, their play will be significantly...different...than the average player.

Aka: Better.

[Flameaxe]

JDodge, UA, flameaxe??? I can't believe it! I'm surrounded by asshast!!

What's an asshast?

[Flameaxe]

It's better than a assfat...

Sorry, I fail to understand this comment. I have trouble understanding things with improper article usage.

[Flameaxe]

these insulting stuff is very pointless, please stop talking about it.

This post is pointless. Pick it up please.

[Flameaxe]

Also, allow me to say something.

In every Mafia game I play, I know that there is nothing I can know is 100% absolutely true about a person until after they are dead, or if it is my own role. Even then I will sometimes stay suspicious. (If I am an investigative role I could be a naive investigator)

Therefore, I find it perfectly fine to base my votes on purely circumstantial evidence, since that is the ONLY evidence that is at all present.

And if anyone is willing to offer a counter argument to the argument of Kison, feel free to do so. I will read it, and, if it is logical enough, I will switch my vote back to Shin.

I know that I personally am not voting because of Kison's case, but your actions of saying "I agree. Vote: X" and nothing more except saying something that rings true for basically everyone. You're jumping on his wagon with nothing but someone else's case and ideas, providing nothing of your own.

[Flameaxe]

Also, allow me to say something.

In every Mafia game I play, I know that there is nothing I can know is 100% absolutely true about a person until after they are dead, or if it is my own role. Even then I will sometimes stay suspicious. (If I am an investigative role I could be a naive investigator)

Therefore, I find it perfectly fine to base my votes on purely circumstantial evidence, since that is the ONLY evidence that is at all present.

And if anyone is willing to offer a counter argument to the argument of Kison, feel free to do so. I will read it, and, if it is logical enough, I will switch my vote back to Shin.

I know that I personally am not voting because of Kison's case, but your actions of saying "I agree. Vote: X" and nothing more except saying something that rings true for basically everyone. You're jumping on his wagon with nothing but someone else's case and ideas, providing nothing of your own.

Do you want me to point out each part of his post I agree with, and explain as to why I agree with him on those points, which will essentially amount to me copying his posts and putting them in my own words?

In other words: What is wrong with agreeing with the points that somebody makes?

The fact that that is the only thing you have done this game, providing no information yourself.

[Flameaxe]

Why should I have to provide information if somebody else has already provided all the information for me?

Hello Lock-On Vote.

[Flameaxe]

I could role claim.

But that presents two problems.

1. Townies could think that I am simply role claiming for the sake of not being lynched, as I have seen, and I am sure you people have seen as well, many times before, and therefore finish up the voting on me.

2. If the townies believe me, that would make me a target for the Mafia, who have nothing to lose by night killing me. At least, I do not think they would.

Stall with general info less please. Most of us have played before, we know all this already.

[Flameaxe]

fuck you.

I mean...bah.