OK….re-read from the start:
Ever so slightly pinged by Maxous’
post 7. Head nod at Lalendra for the same train of thought.
Wasn’t a big fan of Math’s
post 17. Not sure it served any purpose and seemed a bit serious for so early in the game. Try hardish.
Maxous with the animals crying….wtf….
Not a big fan of Math’s
post 23 about discouraging policy lynches. As I mention later in the game…I’m not sure I’ve ever seen any cautions of voiced concerns about policy lynching on D1/P1 of a game before. Seems odd.
Math’s
post 26 seems a bit odd in that he is so concerned about mislynches (either through policy or lolhammers) that he would place a “Let’s see what happens” vote on someone he’s null on in favor of 2-3 other players he’s expressed suspicions towards. smh…. Head nod at Lalendra for the same train of thought.
I feel like I am commenting a lot on Math but he’s providing a lot of material to work with. On that note…
Math’s
post 33 isn’t good imo. He tone shades mutant for two clearly joking posts…unvotes Elmo because Elmo’s one post since Math voted him apparently satisfied Math’s curiosity/concerns..and then votes mutant who in his (Math’s) previous post just 40 minutes earlier was not an option so as to avoid OMGUS/1v1ing and potentially being irrational. :/
Chip
votes me for lame reasoning. How
my post could not be construed as scum hunting (see
post 53) makes me smh….
Not a fan of the Maxous push on mutant but mutant response/s feel town.
OK…not liking Math’s
post 49 reasoning for suspecting Bins. How
Bin’s RVS vote on Not_Mafia can feel forced is beyond me.
Still ok with
my Lalendra read but starting to doubt my Math read.
@A50…not voting anyone at this point because no one was was sticking out to me yet in what limited interest in the game I had atm.
@Raya…if you feel this way about Elmo’s response to Math voting him…how do you feel about Math finding the Elmo response satifactory enough to unvote him? The way you are interpreting Elmo’s response should coincide with Math keeping his vote on Elmo.
@
post 76…I’m town reading A50.
Also at this point in the game I’m leaning town on Elmo, Bins and maybe Not_Mafia ottomh.
OK…so I’m liking Bins at this point but then she makes
post 94 which I do not care for. 1) I personally find it very difficult to find SKs and 2) I think at least for the moment having an SK is a good thing. I’m pretty sure the SK is going to be looking for mafia more than they are in thinning town’s numbers. I.e. trying to focus town on lynching the SK seems misplaced when IMO it’s better to get scum. Especially if we eliminate a scum who controls the vig or the cop switches. A little tarnish on Bins for this post. But I like her
post 96 explanation on SK chat…tarnish removed.
I do not care for Elmo’s
Post 109. I think mutant is making sense ftmp and I am like minded.
Observation WRT Math’s read towards me this game:
Post 26 – I seem good
Post 95 – Math could agree with me being town
Post 126 – Math has me as null-scum because of my interactions rubbing him the wrong way.
Considering I made no posts between Math’s 95 and 126…I don’t get the read change. And considering the only two posts I make between your 26 and 126 are 1) a post where I am town reading Lalendra and “probably” YOU and 2) and response to Chip that you say
”is a good answer”…please elaborate on what is now rubbing you the wrong way that I am null scum to you.
lol at Sauce’s
post 183. Slight townread on Sauce.
OK…Not_Mafia drops back to null.
Done catching up as of post 197…here are my reads:
Town - A50, Mutant, Bins, Sauce
TBD – Lalendra, Elmo, Not_Mafia, Chip
Suspect – Math, Maxous, raya
VOTE: Maxous
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
