fuck i didn't see this, sorry modIn post 634, LlamaFluff wrote:Kop has been prodded
request replacement if he doesn't respond in good faith (outside of prod dodge) but that's obvious
fuck i didn't see this, sorry modIn post 634, LlamaFluff wrote:Kop has been prodded
phone post"who should we lynch tomorrow"
I really think this is just a good wagon but I wanna study it to be sure. And that means not when I am cooking dinner.In post 653, Mathdino wrote:Okay cool last words of one townie is good to me. Now that that's settled:
@Mathblade: Couple things.
1. How are you reading this? On my phone
2. What exactly does Diamond/Sky/cy/Lalendra do in this situation to not get lynched? Why would I answer this when I already did before?
3. What exactly does Diamond/Sky-scum who's pairs with someone else, do in this situation? Already answered and I am not telling scum.
4. Should we just lynch cy instead? Why did the cy and momo wagons stay grounded while the Sky wagon has taken off? That is another option. I am okay either way. Mainly I need to do some comparisons and contrasts of the wagon for benefit of the doubt but it looks to be the majority of the same people.
5. So they're townreading us now (I think), which fucks the policy side of my argument. What does that mean? Nothing? Who scum scumread/townread is irrelevant once exposed. The reads help to see if fuvkups occur.
Edit: @Sky: "Letting the town do what it will" will just result in mafia doing a shitton of distancing. You know very well that scum would and should temporarily bus to distance in this setup. High stakes mean bluffs often work. It's like going all-in.
Luckily I'm in the business of calling all-ins when the odds are in my favour.
I didn't explain everything to my partner because I just came out of Perpetual MyLo, where, for the most part, everyone else in the scum team was incompetent and screwed everything up. This is roughly the same deal: I'm teamed with someone, and we have to work together to win the game. I came in not trusting anyone, especially my own partner.In post 631, MathBlade wrote:Then why not explain the entire plan to your partner?In post 603, DiamondSentinel wrote:I told Sky to hide it because Sky was an unknown in my strategy. If I could control what they did, then that would remove a wild-card from my "team's" actions.In post 537, MathBlade wrote:You mean here?In post 80, Sky_Paladin wrote:I guess what we are looking for is the set of interactions between declared groups that seem suspicious. If you think of every player group as a hydra, we're looking for the two hydra's that have shady interactions.
So with that in mind I think that the mass claim is probably for the best, and in flagrant disregard of what my lover said earlier, I'll go ahead and declare that I'm paired with DiamonSentinel. Interestingly we both independently hated on the dice routine.
In our topic we basically discussed what the setup was because apparently neither of us read it before signing up, then freaking out when we realised that we had no idea how to scumhunt in this scenario, and then to claim or not claim. We decided we'd just go with the flow, so, here I am, flowing away.
That kinda sounds gross :V
Why did you claim despite your claim that your lover suggesting you hide it?
That’s what I am not following.
It feels like Sky just made up something and y’all are scrambling to justify it.
Furthermore do you have a townread on Lalendra or cytheflyguy?
You realize that you don't have to win every battle in order to get a lynch. Your "utility" lynch is a shitty reason. If you don't believe that I would work with you, then you could go for my partner.In post 630, Mathdino wrote:This current conversation you've been having with me, and the last 5 billion convos you've been having with me about theory, are not why I or my partner is scumreading you.In post 629, DiamondSentinel wrote:You could just not lynch me. I mean, you admit here that you think I'd say the exact same thing town or scum. So why are you attempting to lynch me? Is it because I've been at odds with your 2 biggest efforts here?
It's kind of a utility lynch. I don't believe, at this point, that you'll vote with the townbloc I'm personally relying on for LyLo. I believe your read on me has been too set in stone for that. So assuming you're town, if I don't lynch you today, then I have to 100% find the scumteam today. And my strategy doesn't have any way to reliably find scum on D1. The point is to aggregate D1 and D2.
Yes, it's lowkey OMGUS, but here's an analogy.
You're a townie with 1 scum left. 5 players. One player who is a little scummy by association has been gunning for you the whole game. You have little reason to believe they'll change their mind in LyLo. Furthermore, you know for sure that if they're town, scum will leave them alive and let them lynch you in LyLo.
You can't lynch scum if they're alive tomorrow unless scum happens to be them and you can convince the remaining townie. But the player has a chance at convincing that townie.
So you prepare yourself for LyLo by lynching that player, praying to god they're scum (and they are scummy) and then saying, well, I had to lynch someone only for them to flip town, I'd rather it be them. This at least puts you in an okay spot later on.
I'm honestly not sure any of the above is even town indicative. I haven't thought through it but it's possibly also scum's ideal strategy if they were in my slot.
We're at a really really weird impasse.
I assume you want me to lynch sheep/Tora today.
Since you replaced in, I've been keeping up almost none at all. I'm just in an extended conversation with Dino. That's why I'm essentially jsut responding to him, aside from a couple posts here and there.In post 645, MathBlade wrote:I am just curious. Diamond Sentinel has played with me enough to read me.
Yet he only talks Dino. Why? Because Diamond is scum.
You seem not only unaware of sheep's meta of being shitty but also not willing to consider it.In post 660, DiamondSentinel wrote:The only thing that I would ever suggest a policy/utility lynch for would be just straight-up bad play; someone [cough sheep cough refusing to actually try in the game. To say "this person disagrees with me so we should lynch them" is almost exactly like a scum telling their buddies "this person is on to us, so kill them".
As for the sheep/tora lynch? Yes. It's definitely my strongest read. Sheep is blatantly scum, and also is just playing (if you can even call it that) shittily. He's not even trying. Regular lynch + policy lynch = yes please lynch
Also how the fuck are you nulltowning Lalendra?In post 659, DiamondSentinel wrote:I do have a null!town on Lalendra. Cy hasn't done anything noteworthy.
Get me the supposed townslips, and I'll start delving into Tora's meta. But as it is right now, I haven't seen any townslips (also, do note that I likely won't believe any of them are truly townslips. Neither town, nor scumslips happen and are caught. The only ones I personally know about are slips that happen and just skirt by because nobody thinks about them. Blatant ones seemingly never happen.In post 665, Mathdino wrote:You seem not only unaware of sheep's meta of being shitty but also not willing to consider it.In post 660, DiamondSentinel wrote:The only thing that I would ever suggest a policy/utility lynch for would be just straight-up bad play; someone [cough sheep cough refusing to actually try in the game. To say "this person disagrees with me so we should lynch them" is almost exactly like a scum telling their buddies "this person is on to us, so kill them".
As for the sheep/tora lynch? Yes. It's definitely my strongest read. Sheep is blatantly scum, and also is just playing (if you can even call it that) shittily. He's not even trying. Regular lynch + policy lynch = yes please lynch
@Sky/Diamond:I'll give you guys a chance here.
I need you to do 2 things to shake my sheep read.
1.sheep: This looks strongly like policy territory. I need you to do a case that points out scum motivation in his posts and gets me a scumpartner set. I'm obviously personally disinclined to lynch someone who's at least willing to follow my logic. And don't give me the general "oh sheep skates along and does nothing all game" because you know, I replaced into his townslot once, I know this. Literally a shitposting middle schooler.
2.Tora: The reason I'm not shaking this read is the repeated townslips. I need you to get me evidence (ideally based on meta) that "townslips" are NAI and are faked by Tora. Also need evidence for open buddying of town. That part less so.
Do this and I'll strongly consider voting either sheep/Tora, or whomever you think is their partner (I would be more comfortable with this).
It's a gut read, kiddo. Just like I've got you in a gut-town read, despite everything, she's in the same boat right here.In post 666, Mathdino wrote:Also how the fuck are you nulltowning Lalendra?In post 659, DiamondSentinel wrote:I do have a null!town on Lalendra. Cy hasn't done anything noteworthy.
I asked her for a Last Will set of reads and she completely ignored it. Wtf in her ISO indicates town?
Talk to me as if you believe I'm town. I'm obviously unwilling to listen to "she pushed against the scum in you/sheep/Tora".
Lalendra also hasn't done anything noteworthy but Cy posted a garbage post that was a copy/paste wall and voted us for the most trivial of reasons. Lalendra looks like they are sitting on the sidelines and waiting to see which way the wind is blowing before voting.I do have a null!town on Lalendra. Cy hasn't done anything noteworthy
In other news, Sky, stop fucking wagon hopping. It's hard enough for me to deal with this wagon without you floundering here and there.