Open 66 - Quack Multiball (Game over) before 584
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Not sure what I think of Near yet. Plan was bad. Wouldn't scum refuse to answer until they figured out the safe answer? What were the odds of catching scum with this?
The fact that he even put together this plan is confusing to me. Either he is really unfamiliar with sarcasm (when kore says the doc and quack pm's are startingly different), or he is really unfamiliar with the doc/quack pm. Because after getting one myself, I instantly saw kore's sarcasm. Near didn't.
I am in another game with Near, and I have seen him make plans and traps and tests before. So I know he DOES THIS. The game is not over and we're both still alive... so I can't say if this plan-making has anything to do with allignment.
I am torn between thinking Near somehow confused himself (is there any language barrier?) -- since he was confused by the sarcasm, that scum would be more so and he could catch them? OR that he is scum trying to catch someone from the other scum group (or a townie who just made a mistake).
We need to talk to Near more about this.
In the meantime,unvote; vote cream
Cream says he's not certain about Near and then calls him scum like five times.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Is it just because he didn't realize the pms are the same?Glork wrote:Near wrote:MOST IMPORTANT: Here is my advice to you:if for some reason, you are not sure which one you are (for example if you were werewolves,I strongly recommend that you claim quack rather than a doctor.Unvote, Vote: Near. AnytrueScotsmanDoc/Quack will realize exactly why Near is scum.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
This is what I thought you might be doing... but I still don't understand what you wanted docs/quacks to claim. I would have been like... "I don't know."Near wrote: Many of you guys have COMPLETELY missed my point. I KNEW townies could not tell quacks from doctors. That was exactly where my initial confusion was when I wondered if mod was being sarcastic. Then I even said that I realized mod was being sarcastic when I looked at my pm. Looking at this, you should already KNOW that I KNEW I couldn't tell if I am a quack or a doctor.
What claim would have implied scum to you? Either one??- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
But you use SCUM as an example of who should claim quack...Near wrote:
Nope, I wanted all townies to claim quacks. And I thought if you claim doctor after reading my post, you'd be a scum. See below. I guess my test was too confusing...Pink Puppy wrote:
This is what I thought you might be doing... but I still don't understand what you wanted docs/quacks to claim. I would have been like... "I don't know."Near wrote: Many of you guys have COMPLETELY missed my point. I KNEW townies could not tell quacks from doctors. That was exactly where my initial confusion was when I wondered if mod was being sarcastic. Then I even said that I realized mod was being sarcastic when I looked at my pm. Looking at this, you should already KNOW that I KNEW I couldn't tell if I am a quack or a doctor.
What claim would have implied scum to you? Either one??
If you wanted town to claim quack, and scum to claim doc, you should not have said "If you're a werewolf, claim quack."- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
@ EG you are implying we will blame Near's lynch on the hammer voter. And why would we want to do that unless you know Near will come up town? It's like saying you know Near is town. Only scum would know that. And only scum would still be voting someone they know or think is town.Evilgorrilaz wrote:
Or we could lynch whoever hammers him.Cream147 wrote: possibly waste a town lynch because people would use that as evidence against me
@Glork... I support PyroDwarf lynch, but not sure about muffinhead. Have to go check on him tomorrow. I really think EG is scum too.
In the meantime...unvote cream; vote pyrodwarf- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Looking at muffinhead... he blatantly tried to derail Nearwagon. Maybe that was a good thing. It was sort of weird though.
But he did say
Evasive much?Muffinhead wrote:When did i ever say that I didnt think near was scum?
What I want to ask muffinhead is: Do you or did you ever think Near was scum? What did you think of his plan since you didn't comment on it and instead voted Aegor?- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
PD...Your "random" vote on Glork picks him over Cream for no apparent reason. It is doublestandardish.PyroDwarf wrote:
I never said or meant to imply this. I saw that case on near as good, so I voted.Aegor wrote: PD's vote was really weird. You're not supposed to admit that you don't care who gets lynched.
@PinkPuppy: You didn't answer my question, Why is my random vote scummy? I don't understand.glork wrote:PyroDwarf would be a good lynch today, too
Seems to be Glork's case against me... Why would Gorrad write "see glork" for my faults?glork wrote:Hi, have you looked at Muffin and Pyro?
I'm sorry if my vote on near was opportunistic, but he looked really scummy. People have now moved their votes a bit, and I don't think he's in danger of lynch now.
Also, your vote on Near came at a time when we were getting things straightened out with him, and support for his wagon was starting to wane. He was looking less scummy, IMO, but you were not realizing that.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I'm trying to think through this plan of Glork's.
I am wondering how we will "read" the results tomorrow when the mafia and werewolves might not target who they are supposed to, and thus screw up the results (for example: make someone think they are a quack when they are not).
How do we know WTF went on last night when we know mafia and werewolves will lie and do what they want?
Also, since the team only has one kill for 2 ppl, one teammate will look like a doctor anyway when they don't kill their partner.
BUT, I do think we might be able to think up some plan of targets for tonight. We just need to think of one that would make it obvious when someone targets who they are not supposed to.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I am not cut out for making these sort of plans... it's hard enough for me to understand it... lol.
Anyway, your plan is looking better and better. What about how we pair people up? Should we put suspicious people with other suspicious people? Or randomize?
And I would be okay with Near being the orphan out of this plan. I think the plan was sufficiently stupid and made him such a target that a scum would not want to even try it.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I actually agree with zu_faul.zu_Faul wrote:It was obvious that he tried a trick to find out the scum.
I don't think how his action can be interpreted as somewthing else.
Maybe it's just because I have played with Near and have seen him try plans and traps and tests to find scum. But when I read Near's plan I was very confused. On the one hand, he could have been showing that he doesn't know what the doc/quack pm looks like (which would indicate he is scum). BUT, I think the whole point of the plan was that he couldn't show he knew the pms were the same, because THAT WAS THE BASIS FOR CATCHING SCUM. (The whole plan unraveled further because it was really unclear to townies what they should claim...) But, I did originally see a way that the plan was not scummy -- that is why I didn't vote NEar and asked for explanation. I didn't say what I thought he intended, because I didn't want to feed him a good excuse if he was scum. But I did have an idea of what he might have meant.
And I keep thinking that this would be a retarded gambit for scum to make. If Near is scum, making this plan puts him in the spotlight and almost got him lynched. In my experience, scum don't like to take that chance. Unless they're about to get lynched or it's endgame or something. Not on D1 for no reason.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Cream... Glork is just going around pressuring players, which could be town or scum... we don't know. He's not really giving reasons for the people he finds scummy, so I don't know why you find him SO townish.Gorrad wrote:
Yeah. The problem with Glork is that perfect logic is a Nulltell with him. He's the kind of person you should always investigate ASAP or you'll go the whole game worshiping his towniness.Cream147 wrote:The most protown player at the moment in my opinion is Glork who seems to speak nothing but perfect logic.
I don't really get the case on muffinhead.
I guess you could say muffinhead was overly cautious about not lynching Near -- sort of like trying to play the uber-townie. But I'm not totally convinced yet.
I think that people who find muffinhead scummy should ask him some questions or something to try to make sure. Voting him with no explanation and sitting there does nothing.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I already thought this statement was scummy. Even without the meta.Aegor wrote:
Hmm...I am going to do something unorthodox here. In one of my other ongoing games, Evil hammered a townie. This obvious double-standard is coming off as really scummy to me. So scummy that he deserves a vote at this point.Evil wrote:I am not implying anything, just saying if he turns up town we could lynch whoever hammered him.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I will /in to this.Glork wrote:Dear Lovely People,
I'dreallylike to hear everybody weigh in on my proposed plan, because if it's not going to happen, I don't want to waste any more time explaining or discussing it. Some degree of yes, no, maybe would be appreciated.
XOXO,
Glork
I am wondering though if this plan lets scum find out easier who are quacks and who are docs. That's the only downside I am seeing at the moment. If they know who quacks are they can let them live and kill docs.
Basically though I feel it's a good plan.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
So how should we start pairing people up? Should we put together our four top scummiest?
Mine is:
PD
Cream
Evilgorrillaz
Gorrad or muffinhead (I don't feel strongly on a fourth yet. Gorrad for buttkissing, and muffinhead basically because he has a lot of votes right now, so it seems like a good place to put a suspicious person, even if I don't really see it).
Do you think everyone should make a list like this and the four people with the most votes get paired together?- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Lynching? What it always accomplishes. Killing the town's #1 suspect, while providing info for later after we find out allignment and look at the wagon.zu_Faul wrote:What does it accomplish, Pink Puppy?
No lynching is relying totally on the Glork plan. From my understanding of it, it increases tendency for cross-kills, and increases kills on a player who would have died already from a quack. It will definitely give us a lot of information to look at tomorrow, but I don't think it's gonna be 100% definitive. It will narrow things down for us, which is good. But I would rather have a normal d1 lynch to add to the info when we are analyzing results tomorrow.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Near and Muffinhead have not posted a list. HEre is everyone else's list:
Glork wrote:Evil-Puppy
asdf-JDodge
Aegor-Zu
Glork-Near
Cream-Muffin
PD-GorradJdodge wrote:Glork-Zu
Cream-Gorrad
Puppy-Aegor
Near-JD
cow-PD
muffin-evilzu wrote:Cream - PD
Muffin - Gorrad
Near - Puppy
Zu - Glork
Aegor - JDodge
cow - Evilevil wrote:Me - Puppy
Cream - Muffin
Gorrad - JDodge
Near - Pyro
Zu - Aegor
Cow - Glorkcow wrote:near-muffin
cream-evil
PD-PP
zu-aegor
jdodge-glork
cow-gorradPP wrote:PD - EA
Cream - Gorrad
Aegor - Jdodge
Glork - cow
zufaul - muffin
PP - NearPyroD wrote:hasdgfas -Jdodge
Pink Puppy -Cream147
Gorrad -Aegor
zu_Faul -Glork
PyroDwarf -Near
muffinhead -EvilgorrilazGorrad wrote:Zu-Cream
Hasdf-Puppy
Near-Evil
Glork-Aegor
Muffinhead-PD
JDodge-Gorradcream wrote:Muffin-PD
Cream-Zu
Gorrad-Puppy
hasdf-jdodge
near-aegor
glork-evilAegor wrote:Muffin-Evil
Zu-Cream
Gorrad-PD
Me-Hasd
Glork-Near
JDodge-PP- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Glork expressed approval at one time.Jdodge wrote:Glork-Zu
Cream-Gorrad
Puppy-Aegor
Near-JD
cow-PD
muffin-evil
Zu approves.
I approve.
A lot of people seem to not care and want night to come.
I say we go with JDodge list.
I will not be voting no lynch. The rest of you, feel free to vote no lynch and go to night.
If we go to night, follow the jdodge plan and target who you are paired with according to above.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Hey guys, we have two scum groups. So if both scum groups succeeded last night, AND both quacks killed, we would have had four deaths.
This is what happened last night:
glork - zu
cream-gorrad
puppy-aegor
Near- JD
Cow - PD
Muffin -evil
The only possible way for Near and Evilgorrilaz to die is if JD and muffin are scum or quacks. If they were real doctors, they would have protected their partner.
Best thing for us to do today is lynch one of them. In the system we have going now, quacks let the kills go through for mafia/werewolves. We need to eliminate anyone who might be a quack, because they are either scum or quack. If they are scum, we have caught scum. If they're quack, we have eliminated one townie NK for the next night.
Even if worse case scenario (muffin and JD are quacks), we will eliminate any possibility for the scum to hide their night-kill. So we will know exactly who is scum.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Gorrad, I know. You present an interesting possibility by saying any smart scum wouldn't kill the person they're paired with. You could be right. That would mean muffin and JD are quacks and neither scum kill went through.
But isn't there the possibilty that one scum group killed muffin's partner, even though muffin himself is scum and didn't want to be so obv. as to kill his partner?- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I'm saying the only way a kill goes through is if the mafias target someone who is paired with a quack, or paired with the opposing team's mafia.
It's pretty impossible for the mafias to guess who is quack during D1 since we don't even know.
It's easier for them to try to target someone paired with a scummy person (in hopes they are mafia and thus not protecting their paired partner).
Once again, muffin/JD are quacks or mafia, neither of which we need around in this game.
I'm still trying to think about how this will play out. If JD/muffin are both quacks, and we lynch them the next two days, will we have time to lynch the mafia/quacks before we get NKed? I think the answer is yes because after both quacks are gone it should be obvious who is mafia, and we can protect the non-mafiates, and lynch mafiates during the day.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I don't like the fact that you voted me because I don't agree with you. We were having a discussion. I was listening to you and trying to figure stuff out. There was no need ot vote me for that. If you want to vote me for other reasons I would understand... but just because I don't agree with your strategy? That's BS.
And I feel that abandoning the pairings now is bad idea that benefits scum.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Gorrad. Saying scum would not deviate from the plan is WIFOM. Saying scum WOULD DEFINITELY deviate from the plan is also WIFOM.
The only safe conculsion to come to is muffin and JD are either scum or quacks. They are in no way capable of being doctors.
I would rather kill someone who is either a quack or scum. Aiming at the rest of us will only make it possible to kill a doctor. That is lame.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
:Good Posting:muffinhead wrote:
Can someone tell me sice when u spell doctor as s-c-u-m. I now its a typo and it makes sense with the word scum but to make such a mistake i really dunno how.Gorrad wrote:
I meant if I was scum. Sorry. That was honestly just a typo.Pink Puppy wrote:
WHAT?Gorrad wrote:If I was doctor, I wouldn't target my partner because doing so would out me as scum.
Is this a slip of some sort?
What did you mean to say? Because I can't figure it out.
.
Um, I don't know about this "typo" of Gorrad's. Could be totally legit typo and doesn't mean anything. It seems to me that this sort of typo results when you write a sentence one way and then change the meaning without changing al the parts. So it's half of one and half of another. That sort of thing has happened to me before. Usually when I'm scum trying to say "If I were scum..." You have to be very careful when wording things like that to sound like you're imagining yourself being scum, and not like you are scum. It's dangerous, and I usually end up rewriting stuff like that a bunch of times. That's where a typo like Gorrad's would come from, I think.
But I really couldn't tell for sure.
That's why I asked what he meant. And how that typo came to be.
It's sort of funny though that he is trying to say "If I were scum..." (implying he is town), but he actually says "If I were doctor..." (which implies he is scum).
I agree with zu. Muffin sounds legit. His grammar sucks, but I don't think he's faking. I really don't think he's reading over anything that he writes, which makes it pretty hard to conceal scumminess. And I haven't seen him be flamingly scummy at all.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I say lynch Gorrad, have muffin and JD not target anyone, and have nobody target them. We can let scum kill them or crosskill them, but let's not help them die by asking them to target each other.
I guess then the rest of us use our noggin to target who we think is most townish.
I would sort of like ot continue the pairings, but maybe that gives scum too much info? Anyone better at stats please chime in...- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Somehow, seems like poetic justice.Gorrad wrote:
So you want to lynch me AND use my plan? I lol.Pink Puppy wrote:I say lynch Gorrad, have muffin and JD not target anyone, and have nobody target them. We can let scum kill them or crosskill them, but let's not help them die by asking them to target each other.
I guess then the rest of us use our noggin to target who we think is most townish.
I would sort of like ot continue the pairings, but maybe that gives scum too much info? Anyone better at stats please chime in...- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
(bolding mine)Aegor wrote:Agreed hasd. This is getting ridiculous.
Look, it's really easy.We don't target anyone. We let JD and Muffin target each other. If both die, then their alignment is revealed. The end. If neither one dies, then they are a mafia sub-team. Did I miss something? It's really easy.
Also, I don't like PP or JDodge.
You want JD and muffin to target each other and the rest of us don't target??
Seems like the worst possible plan to me. And the most pro-scum.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
I don't understand this either.Gorrad wrote:I disagree with that list, as it pairs me with Aegor.
Why is that bad? Even if you think he's scum?
The only reason I can see anyone objecting to a pairing is if they are scum being paired with someone they think is scum from the other team. If they're paired with their buddy they will know it and place their kill elsewhere. But if they decide the kill who they are paired with they risk outing themself as scum if they kill scum.
I am starting to think Gorrad legitimately think Aegor is scum, even though Gorrad is scum too.
@zu... yes, I am also E_K... I have to phase out this alt because it is too confusing for me to have one. I always pull a DGB.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
This post makes me think I'm right:Gorrad wrote: I object to the pairing because it puts me against someone who will kill me. I don't like that. I mean, I'll do so if y'all really want me to, but I seriously would rather have him paired with someone like PD who I also find VERY scummy.
Of course, best solution is to lynch Aegor. I really like that idea. Let's do that.
Benefits of the random factor is that the scum won't know who's being protected. If we have a list, they can use what they know to plan the best possible kill. If we don't then they have to try and guess who will target who.
I did answer Glork in that we've been through that discussion several times. My ideas on the matter haven't changed. If he wants to reread my earlier posts, he can be my guest.
That Gorrad is scum and Gorrad thinks Aegor is scum so doesn't want to be paired for a crosskill.
Seriously, there's no other reason to object to a pairing. I would think being paired with a scummy player actually increases your chances of survival because the scum wouldn't want to be too obv (also if they kill you and you're scum they've convicted themselves).
This reads to me of scare-mongering. "Do my plan or town is doomed!" "Lynch me and town will lose!"Gorrad wrote:If more people were supporting some of this stuff, I might not be so afraid we'd lose, but as such if I stop pushing this point, right now I think it'd just die out. Which is BAD.
Me no like.
unvote; vote Gorrad- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
Since we will have uneven number after lynching Gorrad, how would circle protect be?
Aegor
Cream
Glork
hascow
PP
PyroDwarf
Zu
Everyone protects the person below on the list (I put it alphabetically for fairness), and then Zu protects Aegor to finish the circle.
Muffin and JD... don't target anyone.
I remember from my unthorough reading of the last quack game they circle protected. It actually didn't work for them, so I'm gonna go and see why. Maybe there is a problem with circle protecting, but I can't see what that might be.- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
- Pink Puppy
-
Pink Puppy Goon
- Pink Puppy
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 502
- Joined: February 12, 2008
- Location: backyard
It really makes no sense to me that Gorrad is so convinced that he will be NK.
Others have already brought up that Gorrad also thinks scum will kill the quacks. If the sucm kill the quacks, they cannot kill Gorrad. So why is he so scared?
Second, why would the scum kill gorrad when the town wants him lynched? I know that as scum, I would never NK someone I thought I could get lynched.
Gorrad's stance does not make sense to me. - Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy
- Pink Puppy