Mini Normal 1989: A Perfectly Normal Day -- Game Over
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Very nice to see you again, my friend.
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I don't like that you answered this post instead of SheepIn post 29, eth0s wrote:tbf you didn't threaten to put out a vote and hws did
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I feel like being angry at being wagoned and hammered early goes both ways, and I actually feel like scum would hate it more.In post 70, Not Known 15 wrote:Town is supposed to:
bring reads on someone else
be angry to be threatened with the hammer this early
try to partipiciate positively in general
Nothing of that applies to HWS.
What about HWS isn't participating positively?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
What flip? How does removing a L-1 vote while catching up seem scummy?In post 83, Tchill13 wrote:who thinks NK15 is town after that flip on his stance?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I think you are the only one so far who has a town read on Not Known. Could you expand on it for me?In post 90, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
meIn post 83, Tchill13 wrote:who thinks NK15 is town after that flip on his stance?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
This is just so weird. I've never got even a whiff of a Not_Mafia playstyle from HWS. I really don't understand your progression in this push.In post 102, Not Known 15 wrote:
I said town is supposed to.In post 100, Chumba wrote:
all of this is false. I literally just completed a game where the town doctor was threatened with a lynch and was lynched and he didn't do any of those things.In post 70, Not Known 15 wrote:Town is supposed to:
bring reads on someone else
be angry to be threatened with the hammer this early
try to partipiciate positively in general
Nothing of that applies to HWS.
what people have told me over and over again on my other accounts and I never really listened applies here.
Not everyone is going to play the way you expect them to. Just because somebody plays different to your expectations doesn't make them scum.
nothing hws is alignment indicative and if you say it is you are lying.
If HWS is someone like Not Mafia(the player that didnt claim 2-shot doc in your last game, not cooperative, badly readable, and otherwise anti-town(and also not really interested into winning and partipiciating positively))then I see no reason not to lynch them Day 1. After all, you don't want to have such players in LYLO anyways, and they wont catch the nightkill unless they are a power role, and HWS claimed vanilla. So yes, they could be:
scum that tried to fake calmness
A Vanilla Townie with an anti-town playstyle
Scum with an anti-town playstyle.
That's a good reason to lynch them Day 1.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Is there a point to coming in here just to make this post?In post 146, Nero Cain wrote:
Whats the point of this after chick told ya'll I had the flu?In post 140, Not Known 15 wrote:Nero isnt here again.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
What about profii's play has you concerned? He's had pretty good observations so far I thinkIn post 150, eth0s wrote: Profii's play has me a bit concerned.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I feel like profii is being overly aware of this Havo hammering situation. It's starting to feel kinda lamist. Like "hey look at me I'm the one that's keeping us from having a quick hammer!"In post 167, profii wrote:That's NK15 at 5 I think, another vote and Havo may likely hammer, think carefully from here on in- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Do you have a reason for this vote other than sheeping profii?
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I see what you're saying, but I think you stretched this way too far. You were comparing him to Not_Mafia in terms of anti-town play. Someone close to that level would have been obviously trolly.In post 176, Not Known 15 wrote:
I was more speaking of the possible player mindset behind this calmness. An anti-town mindset(doesnt really care about winning the game and partipiciating) would be a possible explanation(which would also apply to town playing anti-town), or a scum perspective. That doesn't mean that HWS has to be playing anti-town.... they could simply be scum caught faking towniness.In post 151, Jodaxq wrote:@Not Known, please explain to me why you think HWS has been anti-town. And don't say it's because he didn't have reads on page 3.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Is this you advocating for a Havo policy lynch? I'm confused at this point of this post.In post 180, Nero Cain wrote:
I just wanted to talk about this for a minute. Having an "I hammer at L-1 regardless!" playstyle/gimmick is incredibly anti-town I think. And as scum it allows for mislynches without the responsibility. I mean, playersIn post 77, osuka wrote:
not really, that's just a really bad way to play the gameIn post 63, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
youre very inexperienced thenIn post 62, osuka wrote:hammering anyone at l-1 indiscriminately is probably the stupidest way to play the game I have ever heard of
i'm new to ms but i have a couple years' worth of mafia on my backCOULDhold him responsible but I think most will go "he does it as both alignments, its null." Lynching him would basically be a policy lynch and most all players seem against a policy lynch.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
So you have a town meta read on TChill and Havo but you spent an entire post saying that you don't think meta reads are all that strong? Why do feel the need to hedge your thoughts in this way?In post 184, HeWhoSwims wrote:I think it's definitely anti town but if you look at players (Havo and T) who have the same attitude towards it every game (or well - I assume they have?) I doubt it is really AI.
I think meta arguments aren't too strong normally.
Town may keep their earlier town game for obvious reasons.
Town may leave their earlier town game in case it didn't lead to good results.
Town may stay with their earlier scum game if it's their normal style.
Town may leave their earlier scum game because they play different as town.
Scum may keep to their earlier town game because it's hiding them and/or it's their playstyle.
Scum may leave their earlier town game if it made them look scummy.
Scum may keep their earlier scum game if it helped them win or do well.
Scum may ditch their earlier scum game if they got caught or were obvscum.
If that makes sense.
I feel that meta arguments are usually wobbly as either town or scum may have reason to stick to or leave previous meta. I have town meta on tchill and Havo and I wouldn't be able to solidly tell whether they're scum emulating their town play (albeit a small part of course) or town being themselves.
Obviously y'all could see this differently but I thought I'd throw these thoughts out there- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Isn't this contradictory?In post 202, profii wrote:
See I’m not going to get on that lynch. That eth0s postIn post 200, Not Known 15 wrote:
What the.... no that is not a valid response to a questioned townread. It looks more like a post to hide that they are scum and have absolutely nothing to back up a made up townread. Probably they hope it will get lost after the day ends in my mislynch. Don't make that mistake. If you see my green flip, think about this at night.In post 191, eth0s wrote:I'm townreading tchill because I want to.
VOTE: eth0s
I claim VT.was awful- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Profii doing a lot of justifying for his votes. Is this profii's scum game?In post 203, profii wrote:NK15 - I’m glad you brought up counterwagons because I need to post a vote.
Now, I made a case against tchil which was pretty solid (if I do say so myself) except as TChil rightly pointed out, it was based on him putting a L-1 vote down which wasn’t the case
When I went through the case again, schadd laid down a vote without saying anything, so because I believe my case was awesome I took it as sheeping...
So then it transpired I was wrong- this makes tchil less scummy, but at the time my case looked strong- could schadd be thinking the wagon was going to take off so best to get in quietly to push along what we can now see is more likely to be a mislynch?
I could be being really arrogant because this is based on my own read / case etc so thought I’d put that to someone else to give an opinion- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
You've been rather reserved this game...In post 207, sheepsaysmeep wrote:d1 massclaim amirite- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Why do you consider Nk15 a newbie?In post 212, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
would like to ask that this doesnt end up happeningIn post 207, sheepsaysmeep wrote:d1 massclaim amirite
btw my nk townread was for his confidence
and his telling everyone remember that l-1 is a hammer
it felt much more newbtown than newbscum- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Why aren't you voting for Eth0s then?In post 224, Chickadee wrote:Ethos and you, Tchill
I would say Ethos is probably scummier than you are at the moment for me.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
The "reads change" part comes across as pretty defensive.In post 245, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i didnt like the post before my vote
reads change- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Um.... lol?
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
You didn't vote for eth0s though. You made your case for Schadd in the next postIn post 271, profii wrote:@jodaxq - to be more clear
I liked NKs response so I wasn’t getting on the NK wagon... however I didn’t like the eth0s post so I voted- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
In post 513, Tchill13 wrote:Whoever pushed the havo lynch is scummy af because I completely forgot Nero was in the game which means half the player list is lurking. I'd rather rando vote a lurker at this point.
Who do you think has been lurking? From what I can see it's only really HWS and Schadd. Maybe me also? This seems very aggressive to all of a sudden come out with "half the player list is lurking" when everyone but three had posted within the past couple of hours.In post 515, Tchill13 wrote:Well I'm sick of the lurkers. Jk get well soon.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Why does that make it likely that this was an SvS interaction?In post 509, Not Known 15 wrote:
It reminded me of a Newbie game that featured such a 1v1... and both were scum.In post 508, eth0s wrote:
Still leaving a lot of important q's unanswered... I can't fathom how a townie would see our 1v1 as s/s.In post 507, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 505, eth0s wrote:if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.In post 460, Not Known 15 wrote:I have to agree with Eth0s, unfortunately. I am not sure if Ethos vs Havo is scum vs scum or town vs scum. But Havo's 1v1 behaviour was very bad. So was(here I agree with Tchill) the action of chickadee. Let's look what happens:VOTE: Havo
When things were going to be serious... you suddenly werenot certainanymore and backed off.
I see a high chance for you both to be scum.
But if one of you isn't scum then it is you.
However, with 9 days before deadline I'd like to see more pressure on sheep because I am not sure if I will be alive tomorrow.
Why do you think you won't be alive tomorrow?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
This post is really bad. Profii, who has made sure to let everyone know that Havo hammers at L-1 so we don't get a quick lynch, is talking in this post like Havo is a done deal and tried to push his lynch through quickly.In post 464, profii wrote:no point searching for another scum now because they will use our discussion to fiddle the night kills/actions/etc.
I think I'm on Havo. I think Chumba should just vote and Havo can Havo himself- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I think it makes a lot of sense.In post 529, Tchill13 wrote:jodax what do you make of my case on chumba? do you agree?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
In post 525, profii wrote:
At the time of the post RE eth0s that got mentioned I felt eth0s had strayed from logical into annoyingly sweary argue modeIn post 521, Chumba wrote:I do think that’s uncharacteristic for profli. He is usually more verbose and logical
What are you even saying here? How do these thing address you not being verbose and logical? How does this address your opportunistic vote on Havo?In post 526, profii wrote:I.e I don’t mind a valid 1v1 based on a logical argument but they lost their way- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Yeah I hate this response.In post 530, profii wrote:
I expected not to come back to pages of dribbleIn post 528, Tchill13 wrote:In post 399, profii wrote:VOTE: havo
Phone posting, more to come after footy... give me a couple hours
definitely looks like profii expected the day to end.In post 464, profii wrote:no point searching for another scum now because they will use our discussion to fiddle the night kills/actions/etc.
I think I'm on Havo. I think Chumba should just vote and Havo can Havo himself
VOTE: profii- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
In post 691, sheepsaysmeep wrote:ah fuckCould you please explain your town block?
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Does anyone else believe that profii's Havo Havoing himself post was just amusing? This was after he voted Havo and said there's no point in searching out another scum.In post 609, profii wrote:In post 558, osuka wrote:In post 519, Jodaxq wrote:I think eth0s is very strongly town from the 1v1. I agree with the points TChill made about not wanting to expose himself with a fit like this if he were scum.
i agree that ethos comes off as town from the 1v1In post 520, Jodaxq wrote:Profii's behavior around the 1v1 is concerning to me. He popped in and out without trying to interfere with anything, he kept putting off having a reaction - "I'm not sure what to make about eth0s' breakdown," and he came in with a pretty opportunistic vote on Havo.
but the fact that profii didnt interfere doesn't bother me at all because it's what i would've done if i were online at the time. sometimes you gain more information from just letting the game play out
osuka, you are exactly on my wavelength at this point.In post 560, osuka wrote:
to be fair, i like the thought of havo havoing himselfIn post 523, Jodaxq wrote:
This post is really bad. Profii, who has made sure to let everyone know that Havo hammers at L-1 so we don't get a quick lynch, is talking in this post like Havo is a done deal and tried to push his lynch through quickly.In post 464, profii wrote:no point searching for another scum now because they will use our discussion to fiddle the night kills/actions/etc.
I think I'm on Havo. I think Chumba should just vote and Havo can Havo himself
havo havoing himself was an amusing thought than a push to lynch (this sentence aimed at Jodaxq criticism)
I've already pointed out the argument was becoming more insults than debate of facts so I stayed away. It just seemed tedious.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Yeah I don't like this at all. In what post did Osuka totally get where you are coming from? He said he didn't mind you not interfering with the 1v1 and then said he thought Havo Havoing himself was amusing (which I don't think he said that to defend you).In post 626, profii wrote: Jodaxq seems like a logical poster, I get why she had concerns over some of my posts, but I'm glad that Osuka totally got where I was coming from- sometimes I worry that I'm terrible at written English and say stupid things, but if Osuka read it perfectly, it wasn't that bad. Either way I'm happy with both of them.
The biggest problems are your extremely opportunistic vote on Havo and your post where you say there's no point in hunting other scum. You dropped a vote on Havo and said you'd be away for awhile. Why the rush to vote Havo then? Why not wait until you came back to catch up and vote? Then, you come back, clarify you're still on Havo, and say there's no point in hunting like Havo already has enough votes to be lynched.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
In post 675, Tchill13 wrote:Now nk15 had a great question. What does chumba gain by intervening instead of letting havo and eth0s go at each other?
Would there be more to gain from chumba sitting back or did chumba have enough ammo to make it a quick argument?
I don't know. You've already seen what I think scum would do day one. Sit back.
All Ik is profii definitely expected havo to be lynched by the next time he seen the thread and if chumba/profii are scum together THEN it makes sense for chumba to intervene I guess. Since profii showed no hesitation and felt confident havo would be lynched.
Other than a chumba/profii scum team it may have made more sense for chumba to just "sit back" as scum there.In post 678, Chumba wrote:It’s cause I’m not scum. Town Chumba would step in when somebody is lying. Havo flat out lied. You and he can deny it all you want but it actually fucking happened.
Maybe profli/havo are a team and profli wanted to get on unnoticed? Why haven’t you considered that theory? Bussing happens
It sounds like we should lynch profii.In post 685, Tchill13 wrote:Done? Why are you giving up?
You have the sole right to command when conversations stop and start this game? Which ones get to go on and which ones get to be shut down? Who died and made you king?
Im showing hesitation and he still gives up.
If havo is scum there's 2 others and he refuses to chase that Avenue even if I was working towards that with him.
Unwillingness to work with others.
!!!As soon as I mentioned he's only scum with profii he went from not reading profii until day 2 to saying profii was bussing havo!!!
Funny how that works.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
??? How does that actually answer the question?In post 710, profii wrote:
I think the whole thing was town vs town vs town. It wasn’t a random softclaimIn post 695, Chumba wrote:
why did you feel the need to mention you think i am a vt?In post 692, profii wrote:vt in chumba too- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Wtf?! How can asking for four claims at this point come from town?In post 859, Not Known 15 wrote:There is at least one scum in Havo/eth0s/chumba/chickadee. Likely two. Maybe even three.
Three of them have told us all things that do not add up(Havo, Eth0s and Chumba). Havo and eth0s were on a 1v1. Chickadee intervened. Chumba tried to.
Something is really wrong here. I have the feeling that one of Havo and eth0s is definitely scum, and that one of the later is also scum trying to defuse a 1v1 with scum. Of these two Chumba is the more interesting candidate, because their attempt was not as in the open as the one of chumba.
I think we even should consider a massclaim for those four right now, because it nails down scum in these four to an early claim, and that can be very dangerous for scum in some circumstances. It also forces scum to clear scummy (strong)power role claims there via nightkill to prevent them from getting night info that clears them and incriminates scum.
What happened to your suspicion of HWS?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Didn't you say you town read eth0s, Havo, and Chumba? Why are you okay with this then?In post 877, profii wrote:
fair point, I don't think your plan will fly with the group or the people you wish to claim but I still think its a clever idea.In post 875, Not Known 15 wrote:
Yes. They were not involved in the 1v1 discussion until it got defused(not fully, eth0s still scumreaded Havo for a bit). They were involved in the grammatics fight, fair point. I wouldn't fight against their inclusion in the claim group but the bigger it becomes the worse it is- we don't want to see all our PR's in that group. Or help scum to find out the remaining PR's.In post 869, profii wrote:out of interest, given the involvement of tchill in the dramasphere/lynchpool whatever you want to call it, is there a particular reason you haven't included him?
I see your point but I think the idea is the 4 identified players have a high chance of flipping at least 1 scum, which you must agree with based on your havo stuff, so the idea is to trap these specific dudes. I think that also reduces the risk of requiring future claims as we have something to work with.In post 876, Chumba wrote:I don’t get how the person who made this post
Now wants 4 more people to claim.In post 756, Not Known 15 wrote:with 2 VT claims already been made we cannot afford more claims this early, to protect our power roles we cannot keep putting people under claim pressure and then backing off.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
This seems like you're pretty nonchalant about who you want to be lynched.In post 1129, brassherald wrote:VOTE: profii
If we insist on having Havo or Chumba lynch again, I will be intent to hammer on them, but, I think it's profii unless someone else has info.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
So you did know that NK was town?In post 1134, profii wrote:
Seeing as I’m straight on the chopping block today & you posted this I’ve been waiting to do this for 2 daysIn post 959, Tchill13 wrote:What are the chances profii defended nk15 so when nk15 flipped town profii could say "told you so"
Told you so
I might as well be an obnoxious gimp about this
I’ll be rereading the thread to see if I have a big scum lean on one of you lot that has just jumped straight on me. Odds are one scum will be in this little group that’s formed- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I'm sorry I overreacted to his posts. I thought he was newbscum like you said.In post 1137, Tchill13 wrote:VOTE: profii
Jodaxq I'm kind of alarmed you so readily jumped on nk15 when we had profii pinned down.
VOTE: Profii
This is L-2- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
What happened to Chumba?
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
In post 1184, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, I was in a game where scum replaced out so their slot wouldn't get lynched but agree that it's mostly NAI. I don't think Chumba threatening to replace out is scummy.
We all seem to be pretty good at misinterpreting people's posts.In post 1189, Chickadee wrote:
Chumba never threatened to replace out. He stated he might have to for personal reasons.In post 1184, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, I was in a game where scum replaced out so their slot wouldn't get lynched but agree that it's mostly NAI. I don't think Chumba threatening to replace out is scummy.
People, come on- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I just don't see how this is a good reason to override what you've seen from the rest of the game. There are so many different reasons sheep could have replaced out and a large majority of those have nothing to do with the game.In post 1174, profii wrote:
“I’m going to be really gamey”In post 1173, Tchill13 wrote:replace outs aren't AI i thought?
Yes I know they are usually not but if that slot is scum and it was me I’d just lurk my way to victory the way this seems to be going- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
He hasn't said anything about that at all today?In post 1191, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, tchill was the one that argued that chumba threated to replace out so like I'm commenting on that...- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
This is an odd post. I can't describe it exactly, but it feels kind of defensive in a pre-emptive way. Are you expecting us to jump on you and lynch you? How would profii gain town points otherwise?In post 1183, brassherald wrote:Replacing out is NAI. Profii is just trying to win town points by not leading a mislynch wagon.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
The thing is we're not talking about Chumba's possible replace out. The comments today are in regards to profii saying sheep wouldn't have replaced out of this game if he were scum.In post 1194, HeWhoSwims wrote:Guys, didn't Chumba literally say there was a family emergency or at least something that needed his attention over an online game? Replace outs aren't AI as has been said and especially not this one. Even if it was supposed to be tactical then how's scum!chumba (scumba. hah.) even helping his own slot by leaving his replacement to solve all the problems?- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I really dislike this post. Profii brings up the replace out as a town argument, and you say it's a good play but you don't have a response? What are you even saying?In post 1203, brassherald wrote:The more I think about it, the more I think the play by Profii to bring up the replace out was a really good play. I had no way to respond to it and his school buddy Nero has already been pushing me hard.
I'm guessing that Schadd is the last scum but I'm not sure. Anyway, I'll be here just avoiding prods unless I'm directly addressed. Eth0s is a good player and I'm looking forward to talking with him in the dead chat.- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I'm with you 100% on this
- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
This is at least the second time you've accused someone of being "stuck in a tunnel" on you. I wonder why that is?In post 1270, profii wrote:
Chickodee - I said it was a bad tactic but town motivated. It didn’t help find scum in he claim pool - all it did was to serve NK in proving hisntown motivations. So I absolutely can say thatIn post 1266, Chickadee wrote:I'm not scum. I want to separate game mechanics from Chumba's death tunnel. If it's a no, that's all I need. I don't care what his role is. If it's a yes, that's all I need. I don't need to know what his role is.
Tchil - I’ve said I’ll stop now - I can see you are stuck in a tunnel on me, but I also know I have a number of scum reads across the board. So I’m not in a position to lead the group to a majority scum lynch - I accept no one will follow me at this point. So if I can stop one mislynchn,that’s 1 town not dying. So by just dragging your tunnel out all it does is make you look bad, I’m already at the bottom, you’re coming down with me so feel free to keep pressing me- Jodaxq
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Jodaxq
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
I cringed reading this post. This is just awful.In post 1282, profii wrote:I can’t even be bothered to wait for intent to hammer, I’ll just say I’m not role claiming- if you want to see my role, consider yourselves up against a poker player who is all in. The only way you get to see my cards is if you go all in too and if you just want to see my cards, that’s a bad bet. - Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq
- Jodaxq