Overly defensive.In post 34, havingfitz wrote:Why are you telling me this?In post 22, Hopkirk wrote:@Havingfitz: I agree with Dunn. Fuzzy should be the nightkill here. He's the only one we know for sure is watching for scumslips.
Are you're saying you're scum with Dunnstral? Since he hadn't posted yet in this game. You have a PT with him?
VOTE: Hopkirk
You should explain theseIn post 125, Hopkirk wrote:At least some nice feelings: Brass, Fitz, TPG, Fuzzy, Nero
We should talk: Dunn, Kop, Mom
At least some nasty feelings: Yurin, TNE, Chickadee, Kokichi
UNVOTE: Whoever
VOTE: TNE
Seems like a weird post for you to react like that. It was very clearly a joke and you didn't take it as one, like you were nervous to be linked to him or anyone.In post 156, havingfitz wrote:VOTE: Kokichi OmaIn post 141, havingfitz wrote:In post 72, havingfitz wrote:What am I being defensive of?In post 51, Kokichi Oma wrote:Overly defensive.In post 34, havingfitz wrote:Why are you telling me this?In post 22, Hopkirk wrote:@Havingfitz: I agree with Dunn. Fuzzy should be the nightkill here. He's the only one we know for sure is watching for scumslips.
Are you're saying you're scum with Dunnstral? Since he hadn't posted yet in this game. You have a PT with him?
VOTE: Hopkirk
VOTE: Fitz
Well, it's a bit weird for you to have those ind of reads like 5 pages in, when most of the posts have been joking, including yourself.In post 158, Hopkirk wrote:When I have 45 posts, It feels odd you're asking me to explain all of those reads while not asking anything about/to anyone else at the same time.
Combined with asking in general rather than specifics feels like you're primarily interested in my choice to put you in the nasty pile.
Not enough to sort that much, in my opinion. So as I said, why don't you explain a few reads? What made you not like the people in the bottom list?In post 173, Hopkirk wrote:What kinds of reads exactly? The catagories I used weren't hard town/hard scum. Most of them were impressions.
Most of my posts aren't joking. There's been a fair amount of content/interactions going on and I don't really like dismissing them as irrelevant.
Reply to me, since you were so impatient with my reply.In post 181, havingfitz wrote:What's the other 85% reasoning?In post 171, thenewearth wrote:now I know it might seem like OMGUS
But its only 15% OMGUS so its on the threshold
In post 167, Kokichi Oma wrote:Seems like a weird post for you to react like that. It was very clearly a joke and you didn't take it as one, like you were nervous to be linked to him or anyone.In post 156, havingfitz wrote:VOTE: Kokichi OmaIn post 141, havingfitz wrote:In post 72, havingfitz wrote:What am I being defensive of?In post 51, Kokichi Oma wrote:Overly defensive.In post 34, havingfitz wrote:Why are you telling me this?In post 22, Hopkirk wrote:@Havingfitz: I agree with Dunn. Fuzzy should be the nightkill here. He's the only one we know for sure is watching for scumslips.
Are you're saying you're scum with Dunnstral? Since he hadn't posted yet in this game. You have a PT with him?
VOTE: Hopkirk
VOTE: Fitz
What about my posts give you that feeling?In post 205, Chickadee wrote:Kokichi town lean for now - purely gut
@Nero, any thoughts on someone besides fuzzy?
It would be nice to explain.In post 210, Dunnstral wrote:I don't know, I wasn't invested much into the game at that time
I actually think this is a wagon worth starting:
VOTE: Kokichi Oma
And what have you done that's notable?In post 214, Dunnstral wrote:Nah I'll explain
I don't think you've done much to be notable at this point, I think I would have expected you to notice me hard lurking but maybe I'm wrong
So you're scum reading me for doing the same thing you're doing?In post 217, Dunnstral wrote:Nothing, that's the point, I think you would have at least commented on that
Am I overthinking things?
It's the truth.In post 242, Dunnstral wrote:That's not what I said thoughIn post 228, Kokichi Oma wrote:So you're scum reading me for doing the same thing you're doing?In post 217, Dunnstral wrote:Nothing, that's the point, I think you would have at least commented on that
Am I overthinking things?
VOTE: Dunn
Also, this is a bad vote and you know it. Are you trying to start a 1v1 with me?
In post 212, Kokichi Oma wrote:It would be nice to explain.In post 210, Dunnstral wrote:I don't know, I wasn't invested much into the game at that time
I actually think this is a wagon worth starting:
VOTE: Kokichi Oma
In post 216, Kokichi Oma wrote:In post 214, Dunnstral wrote:Nah I'll explain
I think I would have expected you to notice me hard lurking but maybe I'm wrongI don't think you've done much to be notable at this point,And what have you done that's notable?
In post 228, Kokichi Oma wrote:So you're scum reading me for doing the same thing you're doing?In post 217, Dunnstral wrote:, that's the point, I think you would have at least commented on thatNothing
Am I overthinking things?
VOTE: Dunn
What do you think of my Chickadee post?In post 269, Dunnstral wrote:I'm looking at how I expect you to act, not how I expect myself to act
Better question, how about you tell me why you vote me before you try to sort and interact with me? Especially when I was the one who said we should interact first.In post 311, Hopkirk wrote:Lets interact. There's three people I could vote here, and the other two are inactive enough that I won't get value voting to interact.
Do you feel that reason is also one a town wouldn't give?
This is a lieIn post 348, Hopkirk wrote:Kokichi is a good vote still. Still ignoring direct invitations to engage on multiple points despite allegedly wanting to engage more.
I did. I don't like her post, it sounds fake. Why explain you want more out of a slot instead of just voting. That's 100% theatre posturing
Any pronoun works, don't worry.In post 375, Hopkirk wrote:@Kokichi: Sorry about refering to you as she a lot. I got the impression from your avatar, which is silly since I have a half female avatar.
If I was 100% sure i would be pushing others to vote too, but it's my scumreadIn post 375, Hopkirk wrote:This isn't a reason to be sure of scum- Chick
I think that post was scummy, not sure what you meanIn post 387, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Okay than why not vote Chick anyways....... Kinda sounds like you are not too eager to lynch her or you maybe just dont think she is really scum
I did vote youIn post 390, Chickadee wrote:Vote too? You're not even voting me. You just keep mentioning me as a scum read here and there.In post 388, Kokichi Oma wrote:If I was 100% sure i would be pushing others to vote too, but it's my scumreadIn post 375, Hopkirk wrote:This isn't a reason to be sure of scum- Chick
Yes you caught usIn post 466, Almost50 wrote:Because he's your scum buddy and your defense here is REALLY annoying.In post 464, Kokichi Oma wrote:Why are we lynching the prod dodger again?
Hop is town!In post 508, Hopkirk wrote:I much prefer the phrasing Kok’s hop off his Kop hop after Hop’s Kop hop.Koki's hop on kop and then hop
Reminder: This guy says he scum reads me and wants me lynched, but is appealing to me.In post 592, Kop wrote:What did you not like?
There's one thing that I will say, and you can go through my previous games, I have never fake claimed a PR as scum, I have fake claimed VT as it's the most convenient, but never a PR.
'It was just an observation. Not saying anything to do with the specific voters.In post 626, Hopkirk wrote:Is it the Fitz/Mom/Dunn overlap on Yurkin/Assemble you're concerned about? That had me a little concerned.In post 623, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yurkin, assemble, mom all filled fast.
Don't really see the problem with Assemble/Mom if you discount Yurkin comparisons since there wasn't overlap between Assemble/Mom. If you count Yurkin, 2/3 compared to Mom are different voters.