So I've been doing some reading! Half the playerlist.
CHICKADEE
Still town to me. It seems to me she started off with little conflicts she didn't really need to get involved in, which suggests town. From
178 - it seems scum would go to more effort to placate an active and influential player rather than just "omg stop".
I would be interested in hearing where the slight town lean on Dunn came from in
559, I don't know if she ever went into that.
BRASS/ASSEMBLE
apart from lurking and brass being easily pushed around with his vote, I don't see anything wrong here. Like the content available doesn't really seem that scummy. Lurking itself is NAI.
FUZZY
21 sounds like a quip that would come from town. (What a great reason, I know!
).
35 seems like a fight he wouldn't get into if he was scum, going all the way to a vote rather than just discrediting the scumread.
However I tend to take most claims of "I'm trying to alter my playstyle" (
61) with a spoonful of salt.
239 contains the kind of thing (that Dunn pointed out) that I just struggle to see coming from town. Like... "TNE is scum because she's a lurker. Nero, why am I scum for lurking but she's not?" Like the parallel he's drawing here just makes his vote illogical (if he is town and lurking it doesn't make sense to vote TNE for lurking), and that kind of... self implication I guess I would think scum generally kind of avoid.
Overall his ISO does contain a lot of inquiry into other players' thought processes. Not sure how much those have evolved into reads though.
I saw this and I love it
MOMRANGAL
I'm not a huge fan of the hammer attempt, I think.
I agree with Nero's
613, Mom pushing the brass slot to this extent is fairly
. Definitely not opposed to a lynch here.
DUNNSTRAL
Still, not a lot of scumhunting here. Just in
270 a recognition that Kokichi regularly gets scumread by other people yet Dunn is scumreading him anyway. There's a couple mentions of other players but the motivation for the comments doesn't appear to be sorting.
277 is like he's avoiding being pinned to a stance, I'm not a fan of
279, and in
519, after Hopkirk pointed out that of Dunn's sparse content some of it indicated a scumread on Assemble (and none indicated a scumread on Yurkin) Dunn uses the fact that he hasn't really taken any stances to defend himself. Like that seems super scummy to me.
Also the fact that he puts up a wee bit of a fuss regarding Hopkirk apparently erroneously believing Dunn had a scumread, he naked-votes Assemble in
601. Seems kind of opportunistic there, though I haven't checked how big the wagon was at the time.
From memory, at this moment I don't think I'm particularly interested in lynching anyone in the other half, though I would be fairly bloody surprised if none of them was scum.
Sticking with this Dunn vote for now
I should probably go to sleep.
-Key