You can prove the EV for compulsive even setups by induction, but I haven't seen an obvious way to make that correspond to what happens in Nightless.
Interesting setup though. (And I think it would be kinda fascinating to just run a bunch of 2:1 nano game WIFOM-fests and see what strategies emerge.)
[SETUP] Lynchpin
- mith
-
mith Godfather
- mith
- Godfather
- Godfather
- Posts: 9267
- Joined: March 27, 2002
- Location: McKinney, TX
- Contact:
- mith
-
mith Godfather
- mith
- Godfather
- Godfather
- Posts: 9267
- Joined: March 27, 2002
- Location: McKinney, TX
- Contact:
For odd T+M, Nightless (T+3):M seems to be a pretty good EV approximation even for low counts, and it looks like it converges on this for high counts.
The biggest differences are at the boundaries of T:1 (exact EV for Lynchpin T:1 is Nightless (2T+1):1) and (T+1):M; it's quite good in the middle, and (3M-3):M converges on 50% (corresponding to Nightless 3M:M), so 3:2, 6:3, 9:4, etc. should all be good counts.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- mith
- mith