Who do I need to vote? I'm leaning towards purplename guy.
Also...
Better question. Are you concerned that the Lexa wagon is getting momentum?In post 127, Awoo wrote:ok why is the lexa wagon getting so much momentum but my Q vote & minicase went nowhere
did I hit scum or something?
No you didn't. Your post was immediately after the votecount.In post 131, Lexa wrote:I thought I was already the leading wagon so no, it wasn't that
And, so...In post 131, Lexa wrote:Alexcellent is now guilty of the same thing
Vote count came an hour before my post/vote.In post 133, Lexa wrote:This occurred concurrently to the vote count being posted and it wasn't something that affected my response when the pedit thing came up. That's a fact and don't you dare try and tell me otherwise.
Why me over him? Am I pushing to hard, and he's just kinda "meh"?In post 133, Lexa wrote:And so you're my current priority and he's joined the line.
My defense is faltering! Grasps for straws, ensign!In post 134, Lexa wrote:EBWOP: disregard my last re: post timing, thought you were referring to a different post
As for voting reasons, they are what I said. You entered the game by jumping on a wagon without any game advancing content. That gets a vote everytime.
Which is pure OMGUS at this point...just going to point that out.In post 139, Lexa wrote:My vote is on you!
I did. Didn't see a thought process.In post 144, Lexa wrote:You know what, why don't you take a moment and iso me because that's not my thought process and there's really no rational way you could conclude that it isIn post 140, Mumble wrote:So, in your thought process, me and Alex are both scum? Why not NSG or havingfitz (or rb for that matter)?
Which was because of the pressure when you became the leading wagon....which I pointed out.In post 148, Lexa wrote:Is it not a requirement for you that OMGUS have some sort of emotional investment?
Which was because of the pressure when you became the leading wagon....which I pointed out.In post 148, Lexa wrote:Is it not a requirement for you that OMGUS have some sort of emotional investment?
Yes? It's an emotional reaction to pressure. When there is an immediate reactionary vote without reason, it lends credence towards some reason for it happening.In post 150, Awoo wrote:Mumble is OMGUS scummy? I mean you keep saying OMGUS but is it a general scumtell? better question how is it scummy in this case? A lot of the time I see OMGUS i never see it pushed with this angle, its always ironic or overlooked kind of like how no one does NKA
Well, it's a mafia game. I can only go by what I am sensing/reading.In post 153, Lexa wrote:Here's a thought, how about you stop projecting your own thoughts and ascribing behaviours to me that aren't true?
If you read...I stated I had read. Shocker! You didn't. I voted you on wagon pressure since Havo had already been L-1'd. You reacted badly. Your recovery is also bad. Also, your ISO is fairly defensive.In post 156, Lexa wrote:You voted me on zero reasoning after directly claiming not to have invested in the game state.
To be more clear, your ISO was defensive before I entered the game.
I thought you said Lexa's read list was in line with yours except for your positioning? Pretty sure she has me as her top scum read.In post 327, havingfitz wrote:Mumble is a town lean for me at this point.
So what was it that made you strongly scumread me prior to ISOing me?In post 331, havingfitz wrote:That was before I ISOd you. Hence change in that read.
Cool. Look forward to your thoughts on Lexa.In post 333, havingfitz wrote:Poe...you weren't among the people I was considering town. I still needed to give you a closer look. So Lexa having you as a scum read was not something I was opposed to at that time pending said closer look.
Luca said he was going to put me at L-1 -> I was headed to bed -> seeing games/players on this site (see: Not_Mafia), I had absolutely not trust that someone would give intent and everyone would wait. You can think it's premature. I didn't.In post 531, Papa Zito wrote:I missed that I suppose. Even so without the vote cast and without someone declaring intent it's premature.
I haven't lied about shit you twit.In post 536, Lexa wrote:Someone who Iknowhas directly lied about things I've done or said to push pressure on me comes out at the most convenient moment for him to claim what is in theory the safest role claim in this game* to attack me again is the reddest of red flags. Especially when my own role implies that his claim should at least have a modifier attached.
*idk how 'role power' is seen but i would assume that in a game with no cops doc is pretty up there
I’m still here. I’m hesitant because Lexa is on it.In post 855, Eddie Cane wrote:i've thought about flipping to cedrick, because GNR is more blanket useless than scummy useless. the reads list thing makes it the scummy side though, especially since he was asked a question and /still/ isn't back. your call, i think it could go either way but red is more likely.In post 842, Mumble wrote:Should I vote Riggs, Eddie? Cuz you and Lexa are both on the wagon...
tl:dr - no real stance. Anyone could be anything except for Mumble.In post 877, Lexa wrote:Papa Zito: They've gone way up in my esteem once they started posting. Clear, consistent, logical thoughts, nothing hasty or rash, I pretty much find myself nodding along with them every time they post. I don't agree with their stance on cedrick but everything they were saying when they were part of the earlier push on him was meritous and reasonable. Are now actively pushing to sort people, seemingly successfully. In a roundabout answer to rb I'm not worried about him being on cedrick because I'm confident he's either going to move away or prove me wrong.In post 858, Eddie Cane wrote:soo lexa
give me a rundown of each player rn, your thoughts and shtuff. 2-5 lines each.
Alex: Wish they would post more. They're pretty similar to zito in how they post and I've really liked their thought process. The things they laid out way back at the beginning of the game were thought processes and explanations that you don't see scum have or certainly don't see them lay out. They haven't posted enough to really gauge how they'll perform for the rest of the game but in a vacuum a happy town read.
Eddie: To be perfectly honest I'm completely meta reading you knowing how you post and I'm pretty sure you're town, willing to bet it's more likely that numberq was a LiquetyQuickety type situation where everything they say just comes off scummy. Confident I can tell if you're actually scum by day 3 at worst.
Cedrick: Not really impressive as far as gamesolving goes but the strongest tone read I have, helps that I know that they're defense of me has been accurate and to keep up that degree of conviction for so long is almost impossible as scum.
Luca: Getting kind of null her but he's produced strong content overall, he's been level headed, pushed in appropriate places and at appropriate times and has generally been a voice of reason. Could definitely see this slot flipping red down the line but it would take night results to lynch him in the next couple days.
Awoo: I want to think this slot is town but I don't really know anymore tbqh, I've liked what I've seen from them in general but their content has fallen off a lot and they haven't really pushed to advance the game state since early in the day. They have some good faith from me but I'm watching.
RB: As enigmatic as they were the first time we played. Pretty sure I'm going to have to leave the reads on this slot to others but I'm trying to get what I can from him. Haven't seen anything noticeably scummy from him, a couple town tells here and there, him and Havo are pretty much as hard null as it gets.
Havo: Needs to post more. Presumably we'll get something from them on d2 given their dislike of d1. I've got my walls to reference in any case so I expect to have them somewhat sorted soon.tm
NSG: Falling in esteem as I think she is with everyone but there's still decent reason to think she might be town, as I said to rb I found her pushes on me early in the day to be fairly genuine so she gets credit for that. Should be something more concrete once she catches up.
Fitz: Can see this slot going either way and it's the most interesting for that reason. Their interactions with cedrick feel a lot like the way I was being seen after mumble fight #1, they're being obnoxious for no particular reason and it could easily stem from some bullheaded conviction that they're right. On the other hand there's some fairly compelling evidence to their buddying Mumble which makes that a viable scum team and he's essentially been doing the exact thing to mumble that he's crucifying Cedrick for. Beyond that his posts aren't really impressive either way as far as game sorting goes, it's been one tunnel to another for a while now.
Riggs: Can't rightly scum read what doesn't post but the whole will catchup in a few mins and then disappear is a baaaad look. Lurk scum, lurk town, who knows.
Mumble: See wall #235239
Agree, except for Havo right now.In post 1206, Fissure wrote:I'm gonna stick with my Lexa/Luca/Havo scumteam
Eh...ok. But, yeah, I'm not scumble.In post 1215, Fissure wrote:Win, I was lynched he was not, but only cause of massive town fuck-up
Hey, Dumbweed...missed this part.In post 1181, Papa Zito wrote:Every time I read something I get more unhappy. Today's edition is Mumbles' blatant wagon-hopping.