Nomic - Game Over. King Max Wins!

For completed/abandoned Mish Mash Games.
User avatar
Juls
Juls
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Juls
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7258
Joined: October 4, 2008

Post Post #110 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:24 am

Post by Juls »

Per rule 3, Atticus.Finch has been removed from the game and thus, per rule 2, has lost the game.

Reference:

2. Being removed from the game is equivalent to an automatic loss.
3. Players must post at least once every 48 hours or be removed from the game.
-------------------------------------
Juls
User avatar
ortolan
ortolan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ortolan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4158
Joined: October 27, 2008

Post Post #111 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:25 am

Post by ortolan »

yay, my first victim.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529

Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
User avatar
Drench
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
User avatar
User avatar
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
crucial waukesha voter
Posts: 1834
Joined: September 25, 2008
Pronoun: he/him
Location: crucial waukesha county

Post Post #112 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:26 am

Post by Drench »

Nay to all proposals.
join your union
User avatar
Juls
Juls
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Juls
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7258
Joined: October 4, 2008

Post Post #113 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:46 am

Post by Juls »

Rules P23, P17, P20, P24 and P25 hav been defeated.

[mrow]
P#
[col]
Rule
[col]
Yays
[col]
Nays
[col]
Expires
P23
[col]
Anyone that has proposed more than 10 failed proposals is automatically eliminated from the game for obvious ineptness to create proposals.
[col]
(1) Blackberry
[col]
(7) Drench, prtolan, Empking, Max, chenhsi, alvinz95, Sudo_Nym
[col]
04/20 12:24a.m. CDT
P17
[col]
Any proposition contradicting the golden rules implicitly or explicitly is automatically null and unable to be voted on.
[col]
(0)
[col]
(7) Sudo_Nym, ortolan, Blackberry, Empking, Max, alvinz95, Drench
[col]
04/19 8:01p.m. CDT
P20
[col]
Any Rule that affects any single player or group of players whose sum equates to less than 13 must be unanimously passed to take effect. Those to be affected by the Rule will not have their votes counted.
[col]
(2) ortolan, animorpherv1
[col]
(7) chenshi, Blackberry, Empking, Max, alvinz95, Sudo_Nym
[col]
04/19 10:04p.m. CDT
P24
[col]
Any individual who proposes more than 10 proposals that fail will have their proposal privileges removed. A Meta-Rule will be created at this instance for the purpose of tracking when the player should regain privileges.
[col]
(0)
[col]
(7) Empking, Max, chenhsi, alvinz95, Blackberry, Sudo_Nym, Drench
[col]
04/20 12:32a.m. CDT
P25
[col]
A new Rule category, the Meta-Rule is created. A Meta-Rule is more accurately a Proposal that never expires and deals with situations referring to players. Players may say Yay or Nay for the Meta-Rule at any time, however the Meta-Rule will only be removed once a majority of Yays are accumulated. Players may change their stance on a Meta-Rule at any time. Rules may create Meta-Rules at any time. A sample Meta-Rule is this:
MR1: [PLAYERNAME] Posting Privileges (Yay: 4 - Blah, Tweed, Yap, Dizzy) (Nay: 3 - Me, You, Them)
[col]
(0)
[col]
(7) Empking, Max, chenhsi, alvinz95, Blackberry, Sudo_Nym, Drench
[col]
04/20 12:32 a.m. CDT
-------------------------------------
Juls
User avatar
Drench
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
User avatar
User avatar
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
crucial waukesha voter
Posts: 1834
Joined: September 25, 2008
Pronoun: he/him
Location: crucial waukesha county

Post Post #114 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:49 am

Post by Drench »

Proposal 30


Any Rule that affects any single player or group of players whose sum equates to less than 13 must be unanimously passed to take effect.
join your union
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #115 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:52 am

Post by Empking »

No to Proposal 30


Proposal 31


A proposal that does not affect every living (or still-in if you'd prefer) player in the same way must be unanimously passed to take effect.
Last edited by Empking on Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Drench
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
User avatar
User avatar
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
crucial waukesha voter
Posts: 1834
Joined: September 25, 2008
Pronoun: he/him
Location: crucial waukesha county

Post Post #116 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:53 am

Post by Drench »

Empking wrote:
No to Proposal 30


Proposal 31


A proposal that does not affect every player in the same way must be unanimously passed to take effect.
How is this different? What is wrong with proposal 30?
join your union
User avatar
Drench
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
User avatar
User avatar
Drench
he/him
crucial waukesha voter
crucial waukesha voter
Posts: 1834
Joined: September 25, 2008
Pronoun: he/him
Location: crucial waukesha county

Post Post #117 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:54 am

Post by Drench »

Aye on 13 and 21
join your union
User avatar
chenhsi
chenhsi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
chenhsi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 634
Joined: April 26, 2008

Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:55 am

Post by chenhsi »

No to 28, 29, 30, 31
I lost the game.
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:05 am

Post by Empking »

Drench wrote:
Empking wrote:
No to Proposal 30


Proposal 31


A proposal that does not affect every player in the same way must be unanimously passed to take effect.
How is this different? What is wrong with proposal 30?
I editted it. (Your's doesn't take in account things that won't happen to A)
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:21 am

Post by Max »

I'm wondering here, do we want some form of scoring system?
User avatar
chenhsi
chenhsi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
chenhsi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 634
Joined: April 26, 2008

Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:42 am

Post by chenhsi »

Yes.
I lost the game.
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:51 am

Post by Empking »

chenhsi wrote:Yes.
No. I for one likes the last man standing idea.
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:52 am

Post by Empking »

Proposal 32


A player can create a rule to eliminate one or more players but if the rule failures then the nominator is eliminated.
Plus, if you guys want to make a point, skip the walls, because everyone else in the game does as well. - Magister Ludi
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:00 am

Post by Max »

32. Nay
User avatar
animorpherv1
animorpherv1
Honey Trap
User avatar
User avatar
animorpherv1
Honey Trap
Honey Trap
Posts: 5763
Joined: April 12, 2008
Location: Untraveled Road

Post Post #125 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 5:38 am

Post by animorpherv1 »

Yes to 31
No to 30,29,28


Those 3 are all stupid rukes.
"Animorpherv1's posts are so powerful that prolonged exposure may cause vertigo, nausea, acute tinnitus, and in rare cases, death." - vonflare

"Ani is right 100% of the time" - Alisae
User avatar
chenhsi
chenhsi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
chenhsi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 634
Joined: April 26, 2008

Post Post #126 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:58 am

Post by chenhsi »

No to 32
I lost the game.
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #127 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:11 am

Post by Max »

Nay to all I haven't voted on


I think we should use our rule limit wisely, some of these are just plain stupid
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #128 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:19 am

Post by Empking »

Max wrote:
Nay to all I haven't voted on


I think we should use our rule limit wisely,
We really don't need to.
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #129 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:10 am

Post by Max »

I know we can revoke a rule but I would prefer that we didn't have to revoke a rule before adding another, then discussion will be based on which rules to revoke
User avatar
Empking
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
User avatar
User avatar
Empking
Empking's Alt's Alt
Empking's Alt's Alt
Posts: 16758
Joined: May 4, 2008

Post Post #130 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:16 am

Post by Empking »

Max wrote:I know we can revoke a rule but I would prefer that we didn't have to revoke a rule before adding another, then discussion will be based on which rules to revoke
You can just increase the number of rules we're allowed.
User avatar
Max
Max
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Max
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2280
Joined: April 11, 2006

Post Post #131 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Post by Max »

I'd rather we didn't I'd prefer to keep that limit in place
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #132 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:41 am

Post by Blackberry »

No to 29-32 (sorry).


Although I do, too, like the last man standing concept as opposed to a scoring concept.

I think if enough people voted yes on 28 we could eliminate a number of opponents.
Last edited by Blackberry on Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #133 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:42 am

Post by Blackberry »

Nay to revoking Rule 4.
User avatar
Juls
Juls
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Juls
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7258
Joined: October 4, 2008

Post Post #134 (ISO) » Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:20 pm

Post by Juls »

Per rule 3, orangepenguin and knox have been removed from the game and thus, per rule 2, have lost the game.

Reference:

2. Being removed from the game is equivalent to an automatic loss.
3. Players must post at least once every 48 hours or be removed from the game.


Edited: Missed orangepenguin on first check.
Last edited by Juls on Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
-------------------------------------
Juls

Return to “Sens-O-Tape Archive”