Man I hate early game arguments. Every game I play there seems to be one and it's never productive.
Concerned wrote:If you had told me you just stretched for a reason to randomly vote DTMaster and came up with something silly, I would be more inclined to believe it. It just seems like something you made up. An attempt to cover tracks which you didn't even leave.
This strikes me as a very strange thing to say. You're literally and consciously creating a point against VW here.
Concerned wrote:Firstly my vote against vendel is obviously not serious, the very idea that I would have enough information after such a little bit of time to make a serious accusation is ridiculous. I was trying to pressure him for information and I think in doing so more information is now available to the town.
You say I'm grasping at straws when all I was doing was pointing out his bad logic, "grasping at straws" implies I was trying to build a serious case against him which is an incorrect assumption.
Don't really like this. I'm not sure what, exactly, I'll try to articulate my uneasiness regarding this post later, it's not clicking right now.
Concerned wrote:Firstly my vote against vendel is obviously not serious, the very idea that I would have enough information after such a little bit of time to make a serious accusation is ridiculous. I was trying to pressure him for information and I think in doing so more information is now available to the town.
Your vote on Vendelmaster was not obviously unserious. You specifically cited faulty logic on the part of Vendelmaster for causing it, and now you seem to be backtracking from the seriousness of the vote now that you're being questioned. Oh, and Concerned, would you mind getting an avatar? It'll make it easier for me to find your posts.
LolIMadeAnAccount, why are you voting for yourself...?
And I am starting to get perturbed that Ezekial and Team_Aether haven't even posted yet. For all we know, the scum team hasn't even been on the board.
You're just jealous 'cause my geekshake brings all the nerds to the yard.
That's all right Geekalicious, I kind of like Vendelmaster.
Now, this....
Concerned wrote:Firstly my vote against vendel is obviously not serious, the very idea that I would have enough information after such a little bit of time to make a
serious
accusation is ridiculous.
versus....
Concerned wrote:Why is it so important to you that I am discredited, because my suspicions were on you?
Vendel, a vote implies suspicion onto the person it was cast even if your just joking when you make it. So he might has well have said, "because my vote was on you" and it still would've meant the same.
There is a fine line between genius and insanity. I straddle that line like an inebriated nymphomaniac.
@VW, I dislike random votes and the RVS in general. I'd rather try to find a reason in which discussion can come from and before you say anything I realize that this could be exactly what you did with your reasoning. My goal in this whole discussion was information, despite what you are implying.
@Geek, I tried to use serious reasoning yes, as I said above I'm not a fan of random votes as I don't believe that they benefit the village at all. That said did I honestly expect to build a strong case that VW after such short a time? Of course not. That's all I've been trying to communicate.
@LolI, voting for yourself brought your tally up to three. Surely this opened yourself up to a hammer by the wolves? Do you think it was prudent to do this? Why?
Concerned wrote:@LolI, voting for yourself brought your tally up to three. Surely this opened yourself up to a hammer by the wolves? Do you think it was prudent to do this? Why?
If your stupid enough to believe that two people will suddenly pile onto my wagon with no explantion given you should be lynched right now. If anyone did that right now, we'd know they are scum. Scum aren't stupid. At least I hope they aren't in this game. Otherwise it won't be any fun.
Fix'd for you!
There is a fine line between genius and insanity. I straddle that line like an inebriated nymphomaniac.
Ezekial wrote:Well im sorry new to this I had to friends get me into this, and to be honest i dont know anything.
Hey, that's alright. If you're confused about the game, then I recommend you go to the wiki. I'd recommend the newbie guide (http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... wbie_Guide) and the guide on scum hunting (http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... ding_mafia). As you go through the game and come up on unfamiliar terminology, you can also check the wiki for that. Sometimes, I just like to go through random pages. Also, just go through and read old games. It's terribly helpful.
brothernature wrote:You guys sure are the lurkative bunch, aren't ya? Or am I just in a different time zone than y'all?
Hello brothernature, and welcome to the game. Yeah, I've noted the general lack of activity too. What's your perspective on what's happened in the game so far?
You're just jealous 'cause my geekshake brings all the nerds to the yard.
Geek wrote:Hello brothernature, and welcome to the game. Yeah, I've noted the general lack of activity too. What's your perspective on what's happened in the game so far?
You do know I'm still Loli. He was an alt, and I got tired of logging out and onto him just to post....Anywho, it's kinda hard to get a read on ANYONE if there not posting. Team Aether and Ezek havn't posted at all, Far_Cry's posted once, and he's the IC. Having the IC around is always helpful, unless everyone is just mindlessly following him/her. Also,
Unvote; Vote: geekalicious
. Yay for wagons.
You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone
-Al Capone
Concerned wrote:t;]Firstly my vote against vendel is obviously not serious, the very idea that I would have enough information after such a little bit of time to make a serious accusation is ridiculous. I was trying to pressure him for information and I think in doing so more information is now available to the town.
You say I'm grasping at straws when all I was doing was pointing out his bad logic, "grasping at straws" implies I was trying to build a serious case against him which is an incorrect assumption.
Don't really like this. I'm not sure what, exactly, I'll try to articulate my uneasiness regarding this post later, it's not clicking right now.
/UNVOTE VENDELWALKER
/VOTE CRUELTY
I'm still waiting to here from you as to why my post made you uneasy .
@Ezekiel, don't you agree that feigning ignorance could be a very crafty way of remaining free of suspicion?
@DTMaster, who do you think came out the most scummy in my little "duel" with Vendel and why?
OT: My timezone is +2 so I might be a little out of sync with our American players.
.
. Was hoping for a different and therefore scummy response.