![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Kirby wrote:
I think I explained in the post you quoted why one of them must be scum
No, you have explained why one of them
Shanba wrote:
I have a question for you people: what did scum gain by snow_bunny's hammer?
A non-scum lynch.
EK wrote:
*Also he said "null" on Pome's horrible waffle scumlist post.
It is null in my eyes. Not good play, but I cant see it as scummy as some of you seem to believe.
EK wrote:
Page 1 greendude racism wagon. Chamber hatewagon. SoG jesterwagon. He gets on these easy wagons without even doing any hard work or attacking.
1. I was first (or close to) on the greendude wagon which was just a random vote anyway. Why bring this one up?
2. Chamber was an easy wagon but his playstyle was awfully anti-town.
3. I explained my case on SoG and was a fairly strong attacker (for my playstyle at least).
Just because my targets were "easy" doesn't mean its "scummy". I gave reasons
EK wrote:
Do people think scum or town are more likely to want to lynch the jester?
Both.
EK wrote:
Do you think SoG was acting like a jester? I actually thought he was town for a long time (lol). Certain things he did I consider scummy, like not wanting policy lynches and then going for one on zazie. But otherwise I thought he sounded sort of reasonable, atleast in the earlier posts.
He began acting town but began dropping scumtell after scumtell after chamber replaced. He didn't act like any jester I've seen before but he did act like scum.
Sorry for the brief post but the tags make it take twice as long.