In post 94, Cybertronix wrote:@AP: Vote d3x? I don't see anything suspicious about him. In fact it looks like he's trying to scumhunt, so town points for him.
Trying to scumhunt =/= scumhunting.
In post 94, Cybertronix wrote:@AP: Vote d3x? I don't see anything suspicious about him. In fact it looks like he's trying to scumhunt, so town points for him.
In post 67, MaverickMaestro wrote:Haha, yeah this is our lynch.
In post 75, d3x wrote:
@Dave- in your 3 previous games, did Scum use this tactic? Why is MM scummier than the other 2? Why didn't you mention Leon in your reasoning, you mentioned Safety...
@Dave- Why wait until p14 to ask Leon, you brought this un in p9? What do you hope to gain with your question to Safety? Do you believe we were still in RVS?
In post 70, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 14, Dave168 wrote:@AngryPidgeon: Are you buddying me? How can you say "obv"?
This post rubs me wrong. The phrasing of the question is really pointed.
In post 102, Dave168 wrote:Who are you asking to confirm this? I'm really not sure I can be confident about a single scum, let alone three.
In post 93, AngryPidgeon wrote:You know whats hard for scum players to mimic? Original town-motivated train of thoughts.
In post 93, AngryPidgeon wrote:Kush hasn't done anything scummy. He just said he doesnt care about the game and acknowledged that MS has different styles that he doesn't care about. Being emotional is atown tell. Or is it WIFOM? Thats what people try to tell me when I call out obvious AtE town tells.
In post 93, AngryPidgeon wrote:1. Why would scum claim that?
2. And you aren't insulting me for voting you? Oh wait, you ARE. You are calling me derp and telling me that I suck. Fancy that, this is a 2 way street Thor, be careful when you cross it.
3. Why does this make him scum? Scum do care if they die.
In post 95, AngryPidgeon wrote:P-edit: How about Thor then? Look at his posts. Hes just flinging mud at me for attacking him and implying that Kushmasta is scummy for doing that.
In post 100, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 94, Cybertronix wrote:@AP: Vote d3x? I don't see anything suspicious about him. In fact it looks like he's trying to scumhunt, so town points for him.
Trying to scumhunt =/= scumhunting.
wouldn't me changing my mind a lot be indicative that I in fact DON'T know who the scum are
Read on Thor? He is avtively trying to discredit me in his posts, confirm/deny?
In post 110, Jake from State Farm wrote:@ Thor - based on my skimming, no I don't feel he is. It looks like he's trying to appear busy, but nothing of value is coming from his posts.
In post 111, d3x wrote:p87- What are you smoking AP?Nothing unfortunately. Thatm ay change though if Victor from my work actually starts selling me some goods if you know what I mean. (Im using green font for a reason)
kushWagon 1. SafetyDance 2. MaverickMaestro 3. Cybertronix4. Thor6655. zipperflesh
I don't give 2 shits about your obviously scum motivated wagon analysis. The difference between "One of the first 3 people on it is prolly scum" and "One of the first 4 people on it is prolly scum" is arbitrary as hell. What makes you think that THREE is the magic number specifically? Why is Thor not suspect in this bandwagoning scenario. Thor has even backpedaled now into saying that he thinks its a good PL and not necessarily a scum lynch. LOL. Screw that noise. And Im saying Thor is scummy. And you are scummy. Independent of each other.
My reasoning for saying that there's Scum in the first 3 {aside from a probably outdated meta about 3rd votes from when I last played} follows...
1. Safety voted for reasons I've listed elsewhere along with his continued posting w/o even mentioning the Wagon that he started.
2. Maverick follows with a scummy policy vote stance
3. Cyber follows with policy vote reasons
So? Ok so you think the individual votes here are suspect, where does the blanket statement that one of the first 3 is prob-scum come from then? Why not specify that the individual votes were what was scummy in the first place? Because the way you said it implied that the wagon was scummy and therefore someone on it was scum. (Which is true and that person has a "Best Mafia" bumpersticker and a beard.
Seriously though, why is Thor's vote not suspect? He is, much like scummy Cyber, voting for policy. And Thor has the added bonus of answering my post to him as if he thought Kush was scummy and THEN LATER backtracking into calling it mainly a PL.
I have no problem with Thor's speedwagon vote or zipper's sheeping vote.
Lol, why the fuck not? Someone saying "Lets speedlynch this" is less suspect than those other shit reasons you laid out for calling Bachelors 1 to 3 scummy?
Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not going after Thor at this time. I have him in my 'leaning Town' pile.
Funny enough, I have you there, too. I just can't see a Scum motivation for attacking me the way you have. There would be far easier targets to go after as Scum at this point, imo.
Like Maverick Maestro? Ok, then why did you ask me why Thor's 97 was scummy if you think Im town AND you already agree with me?
side note- is anyone else having problems with their preview screens? After I get a lottle ways past the scrolling, it keeps jumping back up and won't stay to let me see what I'm typing. This is frakking annoying...
Lmao... Hi pot, it's the kettle, you're looking awfully black today.In post 110, Jake from State Farm wrote:*snip*It looks like he's trying to appear busy, but nothing of value is coming from his posts.
In post 90, Thor665 wrote:I actually have no real read on you at the moment other than dislike of your playstyle
In post 114, d3x wrote:@Cyber p89- AntiTown=/=Scummy. If that's your only reason for jumping on the Wagon, I see no reason not to...
VOTE: Cyber
Not if I find the 4th Vote acceptable while the first three are suspect. Let me phrase this another way... I think there is Scum in the first 3 votes because the first 3 votes are scummy. It's the same thing, bro.In post 113, AngryPidgeon wrote:The difference between "One of the first 3 people on it is prolly scum" and "One of the first 4 people on it is prolly scum" is arbitrary as hell.
Firstly, I don't agree with you if you're refering to Thor's p79. I said as much in p97, but I think you read it incorrectly. I agree with Thor's post. Read the full selection as a continued thought...why did you ask me why Thor's 97 was scummy if you think Im town AND you already agree with me?
I happen to agree completely. I do not agree with the kush Wagon b/c it sounds like a policy Lynch as opposed to a scummy player on the hook. What do you find scummy about Thor's stance on kush?
Actually, he said he was voting for the Wagon, not the AntiTown play {unless I'm mistaken}.In post 116, AngryPidgeon wrote:Oh Thor is voting Kush because HIS PLAYSTYLE IS ANTI-TOWN
In post 117, d3x wrote:The way I read it, Thor is voting for the Wagon. I actually don't have a problem with that. We need Wagons, reactions, debate, etc this early in the day. Saying that you're voting for someone for reasons that I deem scummy... is scummy.
In post 90, Thor665 wrote:2. I actuallyhave no real read on youat the moment other than dislike of your playstyle (but that is hardly a new thing in this game...). I'd probably go so far as to call the AtE (Appeal to Emotion) defense thus far as worthy of a decent knee-jerk lynch reaction from me. I do know thatif you're going to play like you have thus far that I don't want you in the game
This is Thor's vote. I read this as voting the Wagon. Nowhere in this post does it say he's voting for any other reason than the speed of said Wagon.In post 30, Thor665 wrote:Huzzah, speed lynch ho!
This is clearly a PL vote.In post 28, Cybertronix wrote:If you're gonna play on MS, you probably want to learn how the game is played here.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: kushm4sta
I contend that this is a Wagon vote.
In post 108, DoubleJD wrote:I have the exact opposite read on pidgeotto at this point. Cmon, hes calling teams less than 24 hours in and being a big pain in the Smurf to everyone. I highly doubt hes scum.