In post 98, Jingle wrote:
Oh, no, in this particular instance it was because I was talking through reads with Koba. We've probably talked more about this game today than there is actual content in this game. The curse of having free time and a teammate like Koba.
oh followup question, how much is koba yelling at you that i'm scum
In post 102, Jingle wrote:
The read is primarily koba's (and has been) but I'm not expected to force it through atm. I think you are scum independent of that, however.
From my early read I overlooked the post where Cerb gave Wgeurts a town read. I'm curious to know if Cerb's town read on Wgeurts was serious or were they joking because at the time Wgeurts only made 1 post which was a vote on Cerb.
In post 103, Porkens wrote:
Do you seriously think you have reliable reads at this point?
I generally don’t think I have reliable reads on page 100. Reads are not the forte of my towngame, barring some specific players. I’m way better at managing the gamestate to make winning possible than actually having the right reads.
Doesn’t stop me litigating the reads I have though, because even if they’re wrong they generate reads for other people.
In post 106, Porkens wrote:
I’m asking more philosophically, not directly at you. Do people in general ever have reliable reads on page 5? Haven’t even read the game btw
i thought you were asking jingle tbh - i'm certainly not displaying a strong level of commitment to any read i make esp. since i've unvoted him but that's why i'm going through the process of talking to people
sometimes i get good hunches early, i caught titus on page 6 of datisi's cafe, but that's usually dependent on a degree of meta. but i'm fully aware not every early read is going to be a banger and am tempering my approach to be cautious here
this is especially true in team mafia because having 3 other people shouting in your ear very often creates an echo chamber effect that can lead you to confirmation bias your reads, and that can lead to people mutually tunneling each other and consuming the thread in a destructive fashion. i am trying to avoid this
I’m not sure how it could be when it’s a generic philosophical response about my overall approach to the game. Do you think I’d lie when there’s an audience of like 70 people, and probably at least a third of them can confirm that is actually my thoughts about the game?
I’m not sure how it could be when it’s a generic philosophical response about my overall approach to the game. Do you think I’d lie when there’s an audience of like 70 people, and probably at least a third of them can confirm that is actually my thoughts about the game?
I don’t think you are lying at all. I just philosophically think that’s a scummy mindset. Not saying you are scum.
In post 112, petapan wrote:
this is especially true in team mafia because having 3 other people shouting in your ear very often creates an echo chamber effect that can lead you to confirmation bias your reads, and that can lead to people mutually tunneling each other and consuming the thread in a destructive fashion. i am trying to avoid this
In post 103, Porkens wrote:
Do you seriously think you have reliable reads at this point?
I generally don’t think I have reliable reads on page 100. Reads are not the forte of my towngame, barring some specific players. I’m way better at managing the gamestate to make winning possible than actually having the right reads.
Doesn’t stop me litigating the reads I have though, because even if they’re wrong they generate reads for other people.
Also this one is trying to figure out how it feels about this post and it doesn't think it's going to any time soon so it's just going to move on because it... probably doesn't matter either way other than "I don't have reliable reads" is just a generally alarming statement.
not a person, just a doll~
this one refers to itself in the third person Get To Know A Doll
