Um...unless you think Whiskers and I are both scum...mbf-town would be acknowledging the same thing...that TAM's wagon has at least 2 scum on it. Which is what I am saying. As for Feng...you aren't reading...I have explained this.In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:Fitz, I can't figure out what you're saying about the TAM wagon. If you so sure that TAM was quick-lynched by scum, then why did you stop pursuing a Feng lynch?
In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:If you're not sure that Feng is scum, then why are you so assertive that scum were desperately scrambling onto TAM?
It's not being assertive....it's stating a fact. Unless anyone believes 2+ of you me and whiskers are scum...they have to agree there are at least 2 scum on TAMs lynch. And Feng is not completely off my radar. But for me to suspect him soley because he was an alterative lynch to TAM is not something I'm prepared to do. As apparently no one else is either.
I did. So? When I voted him there wasn't a TAM QL and a 2nd mislynch to consider. FFS are you even trying?In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:You thought Feng was suspicious enough to warrant a vote yesterday,
I think I've mentioned it twice in the repeated responses to the same questions. I don't think that equates to "ad nauseum" tyvm. Nice painting.In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:and you keep saying (ad nauseum) that TAM's quicklynch makes Feng look bad.
I do still have suspicions towards Feng. as I think I've said more than once today...those suspcions aren't as strong. And your point is?In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:Today you even told me outright that you still suspect Feng.
I haven't had Feng "ranked today" so how do you get that "later in the day" he dropped below Nacho, Whiskers, and Monty on my suspicions list? That presumes he was above them all which is clearly not the case since I am voting nacho. And suspcions change. Ex: You've moved up past everyone but nacho on mine.In post 998, mikeburnfire wrote:Later in the day, he dropped below Nacho, Whiskers, and Monty on your suspicions list. Why?
What "case" from mbf do you think is "stronger?" Where did I contradict myself and where am I using theory? i.e. WTF? And Mike's case seems "pretty fresh?"In post 999, Fegelein wrote:Between MBF and havingfitz,I personally believe that MBF has the stronger case here.A lot of the things fitz is saying is complete theory, he's starting to contradict himself, while Mike's case seems pretty fresh from what I can see.
So basically anyone but you could be scum. Thanks. Wait...you left out Lastsurvivor. Just for S&Gs, what's your read on him?In post 999, Fegelein wrote:That being said, I feel that 1 of them is scum. If MBF is scum, I am almost sure Nacho is.
If fitz is scum, then Nacho could be scum, but it's a slightly weak read. I can see Whiskers and DCL also, maybe Monty.