Open 411: The game of C9++! (Game over: Town Win!)

Alduskkel · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:10 pm

Why would someone lie?

Nobody Special · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:19 pm

I don't know. It's anti-town, at best, and at worst, quite scummy.

Kinda like you, and absta, and ac, all claiming VT even though you're scum.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:26 pm

Votecount 5.02:

absta101 - panzerjager
panzerjager - absta101
Nobody Special - kondi2424

Not Voting - alduskkel, ac1983fan, CF Riot, Nobody Special

With 7 alive it takes 4 to lynch and to no-lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2012-08-10 16:16:46), or by 3:15 AM on August 10th, 2012.

CF Riot · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:01 pm

I'm giving every player 1 post from now to say they lied about their claim then I'm voting NS. VT if it isn't obvious.

Nobody Special · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:06 pm

I'm obviously not lying. But you'd be wrong to vote me.

Can you tell me how I'm scummier than absta?

CF Riot · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:11 pm

Yeah obviously you don't count as far as that statement goes.

Nobody Special · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:13 pm

In post 1129, Nobody Special wrote:Can you tell me how I'm scummier than absta?

CF Riot · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:27 pm

Don't bother NS. You know why you're about to be lynched.

Nobody Special · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:46 pm

No, I really don't.

absta101 · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:34 pm

I'm VT.

Nobody Special · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:39 pm

Alduskkel · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:47 pm

Still rockin' the ol vanilla townie role here.

NS lynch is going to be such a no brainer. BUT we should make absolutely sure that he really is lying, and not anyone else. If NS is by some insane chance town, then lynching him would end the game (since him being town necessitates that there be 3 scum).

NS if you are actually confused about why you are basically caught scum then please reread my post 1123.

Nobody Special · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:55 pm

I am not confused as to why you think I'm "caught scum" -- what I'm confused about is who's lying (and more importantly,

why

).

The power role, whoever you are, needs to come clean now, or we lose. It's that simple. We're going to find out who you are anyway.

absta101 · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:00 am

Jager is next ofc.
How de we know how many scum there are?

Nobody Special · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:10 am

I covered that in my post 1122.

Alduskkel · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:14 am

The setup is designed so that the weaker the town is, the weaker the scum team is. The first few posts have a link to the setup info, but it boils down to this:
Since Venmar was a PR, and there has been only one NK (so no SK), there are really only two possible types of setups left. In the first type we have 2 PRs left and there are 3 scum; in this case NS is surely town. In the second type we have no PRs left but there are only 2 scum; in this case NS is obviously scum.

What we cannot have though is only one PR left. If we do, then there's a Serial Killer. Which means that either the SK or the Mafia are complete idiots and haven't been NKing. The VT claims from everyone but NS implies that NS fucked up with his fakeclaim and is scum.

PJ. · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:37 am

Unvote

That's a gamechanger. Has everyone claimed yet? Cause if everyone claimed VT beside him, he's trying to sell us on an SK being in the setup, which just isn't the case. Along with his disbelief of Venmar, I'm willing to lynch him. But I want all the claims first.

PJ. · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:38 am

EBWOP: Still Vanilla

kondi2424 · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:13 am

In that case, the hypothetical SK should claim. If we mislynch NS based on thinking there's no SK, both the town and the SK lose.

PJ. · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:48 am

In post 1143, kondi2424 wrote:In that case, the hypothetical SK should claim. If we mislynch NS based on thinking there's no SK, both the town and the SK lose.

why would the SK claim here? He hasn't been making kills, and a SK means there are only 2 scum. So he lets us mislynch NS today shoot a 40% shoot at scum tonight, wake up tomorrow with 4 peope and hopefully a scum dead. Then it's he lynchs someone and hopes he doesn't get crosskilled or just wins. No chance an SK claims here.

PJ. · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:52 am

Really starting to think about a kondi/NS scum team

absta101 · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:06 am

In post 382, PJ. wrote:Normally I'd be all over this wagon, but it's NS....

kondi2424 · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:33 am

In post 1144, PJ. wrote:
In post 1143, kondi2424 wrote:In that case, the hypothetical SK should claim. If we mislynch NS based on thinking there's no SK, both the town and the SK lose.

why would the SK claim here? He hasn't been making kills, and a SK means there are only 2 scum. So he lets us mislynch NS today shoot a 40% shoot at scum tonight, wake up tomorrow with 4 peope and hopefully a scum dead. Then it's he lynchs someone and hopes he doesn't get crosskilled or just wins. No chance an SK claims here.

Well thanks for ruining that. What was the point of making that clear when we could have had an outed SK?

PJ. · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:59 am

Because Scum(you/NS) would want us to lynch the SK today, instead of scum.

PJ. · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:00 am

In post 1146, absta101 wrote:
In post 382, PJ. wrote:Normally I'd be all over this wagon, but it's NS....

Also NS does bad/scummy things as town. I was referencing that without being explicit. The dude can't play like a townie to save his life.