As long as you capitalized on the fact that he gave no reasoning and, thusly, provided us with nil in that post while attempting to appear as offering something worthwhile. (aka trying to look pro-town)Rhinox's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2051954#2051954]Post 114[/url] wrote:fixed.xRECKONERx wrote:Rhinox is likelynotscum.
bout the best I can do until there is a reason...
I'm sorry. I thought I could remember all of your names without looking at the playerlist. Guess not. It won't happen again.xofelf's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2052070#2052070]Post 116[/url] wrote:Looker, you seem to have a problem getting names right. not just Mylynes, but mine as well. if it makes it easier, just use Elf. but it's xofelf kthx.
I would, sweetheart, but I'm kind of busy.flinter's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2053005#2053005]Post 118[/url] wrote:Looker, darling, I think I have found a pretty cosy bandwagon for us two. Would you join me?
vote xoxelf
- I wouldn't say sure, but, like I said, I try to avoid making cases based or dependent upon the competence of other players.Gerty's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2053715#2053715]Post 123[/url] wrote:I don't believe it's a gambit, and I'm a bit curious that Looker seems so sure that Kise is town gambiting.Looker wrote:There is no partner, Rhinox; it's a gambit.
It's also hypocritical to vote Kyle for not picking up on the jester thing, considering your initial reaction to Kise's claim was:Looker wrote:Kyle, I don't understand how your mime-jester correlation affects your voting. What did youthinkthey were? Why did you unvote?The case on kyle99 is weak. It's plausible he missed that they were jesters when reading the role PMs. I did the first time I read it, and only caught it the second time.Looker wrote:I say we lynch you. (If you're not going to vote, of course)
- We
- If you had said that before, we could have dropped it then.