In post 108, Towns Last Hope wrote:Like we don't have prs; the double lynch is what we get, if we nolynch we're throwing that away and probably lose
I'm not actually disagreeing that we shouldn't use that 2nd lynch, but considering Alisae was hammered accidentally, I think it's wise to use a No Lynch as our second lynch. But if we use all the D1 time to scumhunt and town agreed to lynch someone, that is the wise thing to do.
But on this post, you are scum and basically encouraging everyone to use the 2nd lynch to have 2 players lynched (which has a possibility that they're town together). "Throwing that away" isn't what town would do. We basically chose to NL for a reason, so therefore, we aren't throwing that away.
I GUESS YOU NEEDED A PAP ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖ ᴘᴀᴘ PAP PAP ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ pap ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖ
ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ
Pretty sure that's a lynch. I will verify and do a VC when I am able. That's 12 or so hours. I will add the time from this post to resolution to deadline, rather than rush a midnight accounting.
In post 50, TierShift wrote:Agreed in full with the above post. Single votes are better. Plus alisae is scummy. VOTE: alisae
On to the theory. It is imperative that we lynch twice everyday. That gives us 3 mislynches and then we can still win the game. If we lynch only once today, we're done for after 3 mislynches.
The highest amount of lynches is always best in a setup like this. I can do the math if anyone disagrees but that town wants to have as many lynches as possible should be a no-brainer.
In post 51, Alisae wrote:The way I saw it Nyd is overanalysing and just posting numbers that I thought didn't mean much.
I mean, he is so...
I'm eyerolling at the lamist math
UNVOTE: nydusher
VOTE: Martha VOTE: Guiltylion
GuiltyLion wrote:
Also, can someone convince me of a pro-town reason to use multiple votes? More votes on more wagons makes it easier for scum to push mislynches.
TierShift wrote:Agreed in full with the above post. Single votes are better.
Sounds like you guys picked the wrong game.
In post 62, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Hiraki VOTE: Towns Last Hope VOTE: Lycanfire VOTE: GuiltyLion VOTE: TierShift VOTE: Alisae VOTE: Not_Mafia VOTE: Martha Zolanski VOTE: Pepchoninga nydushermain
The above 5 votes are five votes on Alisae. Alisae has been lynched. The VC will be added as soon as possible, with an updated deadline for the time being locked.
For now, play on.
Alisae, Vanilla Town, has been lynched D1:Lynch 1.
I'm pretty sure I have a vote somewhere -_- so I'm gonna just take that off now... I suggest everyone do the same. It's easy to lose track of votes in this game I'm assuming considering what just happened.
j/s
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Don't at all like the shade throwing/"analysis" at the end there. And the defensive "my vote was rvs" when nobody asked about it
you beat me to it
VOTE: Martha Zolanski
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 135, Hiraki wrote:Need more opinions from the the people have spoken less.
@Alisae: I think we meant the same thing in different terms.
Vote: GuiltyLion
can you remind me why you think I'm scum again
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 1, Titus wrote:- As players may have multiple votes in play, unvotes that do not mention a player will not be accepted. (Exception: unvote: All or UNVOTE: All will clear all of your votes.)
I'm not sure if NM could ever care enough as to check the votes and unvotes, check the rules, hope the mod enforces the rules and then think of a joke post to take advantage of it.
In post 147, TierShift wrote:I'm not sure if NM could ever care enough as to check the votes and unvotes, check the rules, hope the mod enforces the rules and then think of a joke post to take advantage of it.
