Open 89 - Assassin in the Palace (Over) before 656

[wolframnhart]

oi.. so we have kal who says he has "reasons" for voting mirth and wants to leave it at that, and we have you voting me imlying that your vote has secret reasons you don't want to share.

Think i will just

vote KaleiÐoscøpe

because I don't like the way he posted his answers, very snobbish. I would vote Kort but even though I don't like his answers, at least he gave more then one word.

[Aegor]

"Untitled Due to Lack of Ideas" Votecount

Korts

(0) :

wolframnhart

(1) : Korts

Mirth

(1) : KaleiÐoscøpe

Cephrir

(0) :

KaleiÐoscøpe

(1) : wolframnhart

Bulvox

(0) :

neko2086

(0) :

Not Voting:

Mirth, Cephrir, Bulvox, neko2086

With 7 players alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

[Korts]

[quote="wolframnhart"]oi.. so we have kal who says he has "reasons" for voting mirth and wants to leave it at that, and we have you voting me imlying that your vote has secret reasons you don't want to share.

Think i will just

vote KaleiÐoscøpe

because I don't like the way he posted his answers, very snobbish. I would vote Kort but even though I don't like his answers, at least he gave more then one word.[/quote]

This post is fail, if not outright scummy. Basically K-scope and I did the same thing and yet he is the scummier for being "snobbish"? More words=more townliness equation is wrong.

[wolframnhart]

Never said the "equation" is wrong, just that this is what i believe, unhelpful players usually can be scum imho, not always, but usually.

[Korts]

Never said the "equation" is wrong, just that this is what i believe, unhelpful players usually can be scum imho, not always, but usually.

Can you provide statistical proof? Let me rephrase that: do you have enough experience to have seen enough unhelpful scum vs. unhelpful town for a claim like that?

[wolframnhart]

Not a ton pf experience no. I have mainly played in games where unhelpful people can end up being townies, and by unhelpful i mean posts make no sense.
I am in a game where the situation is reversed, but since it is on going I don't think i can talk about it? not sure no the rule with that one.
And some games that I have read through or skimmed through i have seen some scum be unhelpful like Kal, and with how fast this game had gone (its almost at a screeching halt now compared to the two days we just whizzed by) imo he thought he could just vote and then no one would think anything of it, just vote along.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Reasons are anti-town.

Learn the game.

[Cephrir]

Some people need to shut up.

FoS wolf

. I do sorta agree with you about K-scope, but more importantly, see: Post 127.

[wolframnhart]

I already answered that post

[Cephrir]

Meh.

Also, I've decided this setup is lame.

[wolframnhart]

how so?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Cephrir, vote with me!

[Korts]

Or me!

[Cephrir]

Hey, I'm thinking who I want to vote for, don't pressure me <.<

Going to view-all-posts-by everyone later and then vote.

[Mirth]

Just got access again. Train-travel is evil.

Also,

vote: Korts

. For yesterday.

[Bulvox]

Vote: Neko2086

[wolframnhart]

unvote. vote Korts

[neko2086]

OK, I'm back! Will get caught up now

[neko2086]

So wolf, you're suddenly a fan of voting w/o providing reasoning? Your vote here seems mostly omgus-y. FOS for you.


Korts, question about this:

I think there's been a gain.

Korts, why did you vote for Ceph at the beginning?
Bul, what the frak with forcing the Crazy lynch?

Both of you earn FOSes.

Talking isn't antitown. Too much can be, but I agree that random speedlynches are bad play. It kinda makes the game not mafia, too, which is lame. Policy lynching anyone who gets above X votes is probably good though, much as it would be fun to put the king at L-1 for no reason.

Hum, the majority is actually informed in this setup. I guess that's kinda the point.

This post strikes me as scummy. I can't figure out how, but it does.

Did you mean

these

posts, or which post were you referring to?


Quick note: wolf was the first to put the 3rd vote on Crazy. That got lost in the vote-hopping frenzy, then bulvox put the 3rd on him later.

Also want to note: Rapid vote changes, like yesterday, are probably best avoided, imo, because there's too much of an opportunity to unintentionally dole out information, and there's also too much room for the assassin to drop a safe, unexplained and baseless vote and go completely unnoticed.

[Korts]

@neko: only the second post. Mirth asked why I voted Ceph in the first quote, and I answered with the second quote.

Mirth, if we're talking about yesterday, you'd be just as good a lynch.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Yes, vote Mirth

[Korts]

[quote="KaleiÃ

[Cephrir]

Vote: wolf
FoS: Mirth

[neko2086]

Wow I'm an idiot. I get it now.


I'm wondering if Ceph thinks this setup is lame because he's the assassin and he doesn't like being the only one here with no info or friends.

[Cephrir]

Nah, I just don't like not being able to explain myself.