VOTE: Bowser
Also @Mod: Can you replace Baby Spice? Haha
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Ah must have missed that. Oh well. I'll go back to scumhunting when I get back on later today. UNVOTE: BowserNexus wrote:He doesn't let votes on himself pass. I asked last day.
First day when we were lynching muh, he said he was a VT.mallowgeno wrote:When?Bunnylover wrote:DP Didn't you claim VT?
mallowgeno wrote:When?Bunnylover wrote:DP Didn't you claim VT?
DavidParker wrote:diddin wrote:Hello, standard "I'm trying to be active" fluff.mallowgeno wrote:Congrats Aurorus (Sig)
I'm actually ok with Shotty coming in. My policy lynch call was actually semi-serious, but it was also partially a move to generate discussion. If Shotty starts being Shotty again, I will re-pursue the PL.
2 things wrong with muh's claim:
1. He claimed Vanilla in a game that, as a bastard game, I believe to be vanillaless.
2. He didn't claim a character name.
FAKECLAIM CAUGHTPoint 1, well i'm a VT too, soooo that doesn't bother me.
Point 2, YES. Exactly. HE claimed no character name. IN a game where the mod stated players wouldn't be given fake-claims (I'm pretty sure he said that somehwrere), muh did not claim a name. That makes me think he is stalling or doesn't know what to claim. I agree he is probably scum now.
Extiguish: whichever scum I am currently voting for (because they are obv scum if I am voting them
TORCH: MUH
DavidParker wrote:I think I already claimed VT.
And we have a mason claim.
There's no harm in a mass claim.
I wouldn't bother with popcorn style because of inactives, just claim away, although it's not ideal.