Ryan (4): JordanA24, Guardian, Erg0, Ether
Guardian (1): Jalyn
NabakovNabakov (1): d3sisted
Not voting: the rest
With 16 alive it's 9 to lynch.
I also think this might be scum running away. On top of that, the way he said Mafiate rather than scum seems like a psychological slip to me.darko wrote:This will probably be my last post in the game.Mod, please replace me.
NabakovNabakov is hypocritical with his one wagon or another statements and fails to continue with that progression. His reluctance (or abstinence) of voting for one of his previous suspects yesterday makes me believe he is the most likely mafiate.
vote: NabakovNabakov
I don't really understand this: why is saying "mafiate" a slip? Isn't that a synonym for "scum"?JordanA24 wrote:I also think this might be scum running away. On top of that, the way he said Mafiate rather than scum seems like a psychological slip to me.darko wrote:This will probably be my last post in the game.Mod, please replace me.
NabakovNabakov is hypocritical with his one wagon or another statements and fails to continue with that progression. His reluctance (or abstinence) of voting for one of his previous suspects yesterday makes me believe he is the most likely mafiate.
vote: NabakovNabakov
I'm hypnotic in my putdowns?
I haven't heard that before...
I'm not suggesting anyone should ever get lynched or anything for it, it's just proven to be a solid starting point for me, upon which I go check all their posts and see if there's anything wrong.In Assassins in the Palace, I used "Scum", "Mafia" and "Assassins" to denote the bad guys.
I just outright reject the tell as useful.Xdaamno wrote:I wasn't even referring to darko, I was defending the integrity of a useful tell
Why is my logic horrible? Because I called you on a stupid comment you made? I didn't find Sir Tornado trying to "shove a Guardian/Ryan relationship" down people's throats" (you've been overly sensitive about that.) I invite everyone to read back through and show me how he was trying to say we were 100% a pair, he stated it a few times, made a couple of observations and you freaked out (a pattern with you in this game since the beginning)Guardian wrote:and all that. Today, he is parroting the bull levied against me -- not only is his logic horrible, he has demonstrated a complete lack of reading the thread (re: Sir T), and is finding me, the only person even considering defending him, to be likely scum. Complete and utter bull.
Would you like to join us?Erg0 wrote:Would you and Zindy like some privacy?
This thread is awesome.I didn't find Sir Tornado trying to "shove a Guardian/Ryan relationship" down people's throats"
He was too busy shoving things down Adel's throat, amirite?Xdaamno wrote:This thread is awesome.I didn't find Sir Tornado trying to "shove a Guardian/Ryan relationship" down people's throats"