Mini Normal 608 - Game Over

[Corinthian]

vote gimbo.

that constant animated licking annoys the shit out of me.

[#44]

Vote Phoebus

My random number generator picked you! I doubt you can debunk this kind of solid evidence.

[XReyoX]

LlamaFluff (1): skitzer
Gimbo(1): Corinthian
Phoebus(1): #44

Not voting (9): Cavebear with a toothache , Dattebayo , FlyingFoxBat , Gimbo , Gojira , LlamaFluff , Phoebus , Slaine Hayes , Tommy

7 votes to lynch

[FlyingFoxBat]

Vote: FlyingFoxBat

C'mon, folks! IT'S HAMMAH TIME!

[Phoebus]

vote: FlyingFoxBat

Gimbo - that's really not too much of a useful attitude...
As I've mentioned elsewhere...

[skitzer]

bird2234 has the same avatar. Copy cat.

Ha! Ha! funny! it looks like a cat! Ha!

[LlamaFluff]

vote #44

for using a random number generator

[XReyoX]

FlyingFoxBat (2): FlyingFoxBat, Phoebus
LlamaFluff (1): skitzer
Gimbo (1): Corinthian
Phoebus (1): #44
#44 (1): LlamaFluff

Not voting (6): Cavebear with a toothache , Dattebayo , Gimbo , Gojira , Slaine Hayes , Tommy

7 votes to lynch

[#44]

vote #44

for using a random number generator

Oh? So you have a better method?

[skitzer]

I know I do. It's called scumhunting...

lol j/k.

[Dattebayo]

Vote: Tommy

for being the first player to post.

On a more serious note, why did you feel compelled to say:

Hello. Hope you all have a good game.

My first non-newbie one.

[Gimbo]

Vote: #44[/b} because you are just that, a NUMBER, you are not important enough to acquire a name.

[Gimbo]

shit
EBWOP:

Vote: #44

because you are just that, a NUMBER, you are not important enough to acquire a name.

[XReyoX]

FlyingFoxBat (2): FlyingFoxBat, Phoebus
#44 (2): LlamaFluff, Gimbo
LlamaFluff (1): skitzer
Gimbo (1): Corinthian
Phoebus (1): #44
Tommy (1): Dattebayo

Not voting (4): Cavebear with a toothache , Gojira , Slaine Hayes , Tommy

7 votes to lynch

[#44]

shit
EBWOP:

Vote: #44

because you are just that, a NUMBER, you are not important enough to acquire a name.

From now on I shall be known as NumberFortyFour!

[LlamaFluff]

vote #44

for using a random number generator

Oh? So you have a better method?

Personal choice for a random vote is to me much more useful. If you have a reason, no matter what it is, it is something. By saying that your vote is random, you are making sure that in no way you can be held accountable for it.

So personal vote > random number generator vote

[Gimbo]

shit
EBWOP:

Vote: #44

because you are just that, a NUMBER, you are not important enough to acquire a name.

From now on I shall be known as NumberFortyFour!

LOL, amazed you didn't get offend, so i'll

Unvote Vote:Cavebear with a toothache

ya think ya won't get votes cause your name is long as the hell, didn't ya?

[Slaine Hayes]

Vote: Caveman with a toothache

....because I have a toothache!!!!!

[#44]

Personal choice for a random vote is to me much more useful. If you have a reason, no matter what it is, it is something. By saying that your vote is random, you are making sure that in no way you can be held accountable for it.

So personal vote > random number generator vote

Not true. This stage is random so if someone doesn't use a number generator they can also say it was completely random. Regardless of what method someone uses, it doesn't excuse them. Now if I had used a random number generator when there already was a bandwagon on someone or later then

their first post

ingame, I would agree with you. There are no reasons to vote for someone before you can get any information.

So random stage generator = random stage personal vote

[LlamaFluff]

Not true. This stage is random so if someone doesn't use a number generator they can also say it was completely random. Regardless of what method someone uses, it doesn't excuse them. Now if I had used a random number generator when there already was a bandwagon on someone or later then

their first post

ingame, I would agree with you. There are no reasons to vote for someone before you can get any information.

So random stage generator = random stage personal vote

Its probally a difference of opinions, but even if you say "vote player AAA" because he is first on the list. You can later say "hey, AAA was mafia, why did player BBB vote them day one and then jump a easy wagon?"

If you do "vote player AAA random number gen" you just can say "hey it was random" and not be tied to or held responsable for your D1 vote.

I feel that an "arbitrary" vote is better then a "random" vote

[Cavebear with a toothache]

Arbitrary is pretty much the same as random in this case, as it's not commonly entirely random in the mathematical sense of the word. Well, except in the case of people who use dice rolls and stuff, but that's just boring. >_> Plus, random votes aren't always random, a cop might "random vote" someone who they investigated N0 for example.

Anyway, OMGUS

vote: Slaine Hayes

, obv. bandwagoning scum.

[Dattebayo]

Anyway, OMGUS vote: Slaine Hayes, obv. bandwagoning scum.

Your probably wrong; looking at the timings it looked Slaine Hayes simulposted and therefore didn't bandwagon.

Personal choice for a random vote is to me much more useful. If you have a reason, no matter what it is, it is something. By saying that your vote is random, you are making sure that in no way you can be held accountable for it.

It looks like you are attacking #44, is my interpretation correct?

[LlamaFluff]

Personal choice for a random vote is to me much more useful. If you have a reason, no matter what it is, it is something. By saying that your vote is random, you are making sure that in no way you can be held accountable for it.

It looks like you are attacking #44, is my interpretation correct?

One of my irks is when people deliberately call their inital vote random when they make it, or use a random generator, so yes I am attacking him a bit.

This isnt intended to lynch him, but it definantly will generate discussion on the early part of the game, and let us see how other players react to casting their inital votes as this conversation is going on.

[Gojira]

As I understand it, it's quite normal for initial votes to be either arbitrary or random - sometimes called the latter even when they're more the former.

...let us see how other players react to casting their inital votes as this conversation is going on.

If you like.

Vote: LlamaFluff

- you're making far too much of a big deal out of it, I think.

[LlamaFluff]

arbitrary or random

Yes, and to me they are two different things, and are to be treated differently

...let us see how other players react to casting their inital votes as this conversation is going on.

If you like.

Vote: LlamaFluff

- you're making far too much of a big deal out of it, I think.

Duley noted, when I challenge random votes, you decide not to random vote. Instead you vote the person challenging random votes compared to arbitrary ones. Therefore making an arbitrary vote... like I did.