ironicIn post 1635, Bins wrote:LQ, do you not like a Smith lynch?
please answer
No, I don't like a Smith lynch. I don't think Smith is faking reads at all.. their cases look way too sound to be Scum BS IMO.In post 1650, Bins wrote:ironicIn post 1635, Bins wrote:LQ, do you not like a Smith lynch?
please answer
Because it is?LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't at all like that you are cherry picking what you respond to while we converse. It looks extremely avoidant.
Absolutely not; Smithereens is confirmed town.RadiantCowbells wrote:Vote Smithereens with me?
In post 1653, Ranger wrote:Absolutely not; Smithereens is confirmed town.RadiantCowbells wrote:Vote Smithereens with me?
You should know this and if you don't I feel bad for you, but that is not how lynches work. You are in no danger of getting lynch as it is - no idea where this paranoia is coming from. Even if you do get lynched and flip Town there is very far from a guarantee that RC gets flipped next because you want a retaliation lynch.In post 1654, Smithereens wrote:If I get lynched I want a retaliation lynch on RC because of how he wants my lynch to supposedly 'test' his reads. Scum are looking for a free lynch on a town without retributive scrutiny, that should be obvious to everyone. Inb4 a random self hammer, I want RC to die with me, I'm liking him for a rather intelligent scum.
I always support my own lynch if I can use it to kill my scum reads. You'll understand more as we play more games together though, so leave it be for now.In post 1657, LicketyQuickety wrote:You should know this and if you don't I feel bad for you, but that is not how lynches work. You are in no danger of getting lynch as it is - no idea where this paranoia is coming from. Even if you do get lynched and flip Town there is very far from a guarantee that RC gets flipped next because you want a retaliation lynch.In post 1654, Smithereens wrote:If I get lynched I want a retaliation lynch on RC because of how he wants my lynch to supposedly 'test' his reads. Scum are looking for a free lynch on a town without retributive scrutiny, that should be obvious to everyone. Inb4 a random self hammer, I want RC to die with me, I'm liking him for a rather intelligent scum.
In short, this comment I feel is coming out of left field and I have no idea why you even made it.
Do you know why this is badIn post 1659, Smithereens wrote:I always support my own lynch if I can use it to kill my scum reads. You'll understand more as we play more games together though, so leave it be for now.In post 1657, LicketyQuickety wrote:You should know this and if you don't I feel bad for you, but that is not how lynches work. You are in no danger of getting lynch as it is - no idea where this paranoia is coming from. Even if you do get lynched and flip Town there is very far from a guarantee that RC gets flipped next because you want a retaliation lynch.In post 1654, Smithereens wrote:If I get lynched I want a retaliation lynch on RC because of how he wants my lynch to supposedly 'test' his reads. Scum are looking for a free lynch on a town without retributive scrutiny, that should be obvious to everyone. Inb4 a random self hammer, I want RC to die with me, I'm liking him for a rather intelligent scum.
In short, this comment I feel is coming out of left field and I have no idea why you even made it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯In post 1664, a plain farmer wrote:LQ, why are you jumping around with your vote so much?
A suicide bomber is a pro town role for this same reason. A 1v1 trade off is always worthwhile.In post 1662, Zachstralkita wrote:If you lynch yourself and the NK hits that is two town down (hypothetically) for one scum the next day.
Why do you not push for said scum lynch today and avoid being detrimental?
" bins is scum "
it seems I can't stop this meteor of doom
No, not always.In post 1666, Smithereens wrote:A suicide bomber is a pro town role for this same reason. A 1v1 trade off is always worthwhile.In post 1662, Zachstralkita wrote:If you lynch yourself and the NK hits that is two town down (hypothetically) for one scum the next day.
Why do you not push for said scum lynch today and avoid being detrimental?
" bins is scum "
it seems I can't stop this meteor of doom
I'd love for your head to roll too. But I was talking about RC mainly.In post 1667, Bins wrote:I'm not getting lynched just because you flip town or scum, lmfao.
You've been making posts like this all game. Its like you are doing it out of fear. Fear.. I smell it on you.In post 1667, Bins wrote:I'm not getting lynched just because you flip town or scum, lmfao.
You should vote bins then.In post 1670, LicketyQuickety wrote:You've been making posts like this all game. Its like you are doing it out of fear. Fear.. I smell it on you.In post 1667, Bins wrote:I'm not getting lynched just because you flip town or scum, lmfao.
Generally when someone tries to move perception of them to as far an opposite as what was suggested about them, that suggestion is dead right.In post 1671, Bins wrote:How do you sense fear from that!? I think he's being hilarious. Opposite of scared.
Also, I don't like getting lynched as any alignment. That's why Smith's post bugs me.