Great... now I have to do a PBPA to prove my point...
You made 1 post on page 1:
Vote Stewie
For no other reason than that I will be a happier player of that godawful moving picture is no longer in this thread.
Short and disinformative...
2 on page 2:
I don't buy into the Mathcam bandwagon. If he were Mafia, he would not draw attention on him by mistakes that can so easily be avoided like guessing the game set-up where it is actually already stated. It looks more like one or more sum is trying to get rid of an experienced player.
FOS Mathcam voters
Ok, you're actually making a point here. Still, it is a short post, stating the obvious. The people voting for mathcam were scum/following crap logic.
Saigon wrote:And I think Dragon Phoenix may have a point. Unless he's mafia with Mathcam and is trying to protect him in an intelligent way.
Not so intelligent if this were true - that only worked the first few games. Unless I (still supposing we are both scum) play the card that everyone knows that an experienced player would not support a co-scum this way. Which degrades to the I know that you know that I know.... type of argument.
Not much to make from this. The fact that Saigon said this means little, since it was a 'unless' thing, and could be a cover.
4 on page 3:
How about not?
Non-posters are autmatic mod kill fodder. Let's try to lynch someone else.
Stating the obvious in a short post.
Is this really a modkill or a Saigon joke? There is NO mention of 'edited by..', although that could be because it could have been edited within a few minutes.
A Saigon joke? I don't know Saigon, but that's going a bit far for a joke, really. Once more, little relevant information.
Fair enough, thanks for pointing that out.
*makes note to keep on checking page 1 every time he visits the thread*
Just a thanks, no relevant information.
5-4-3-2-1....
Uhh... wow.
1 on Page 4 (I will count the doublepost as one)
unvote Stewie
vote NoIdea
for:
1. crap logic - there is no reason why there must be an experienced player in the mafia
2. bad application of crap logic - Saigon voted for me earlier on this page.
OK, now it's the previous page.
Just basically follwing people around. (Note that this is when he unvotes his random vote directed to Stewie.
2 on Page 5:
I'm falling back on my first choice now:
vote Stewie
This really makes me think 'yeah, sure'. Your first choice was based on him having an annoying avatar...
unvote Stewie, vote Mojo
I don't find the arguments against him very convincing, but it is day 1.
And following the lynch mob once more.
3 on Page 6
Ummm... admitting stupidity is not a recommended way of playing in this game...
Short and no relevant information.
(next day starts)
Well, I'm least suspicious of Tigris and Spoon, because I think they would not have hurried to end the day and kill off their fellow mafia, who actually had shown up just before.
And for the same reason (not jumping on the bandwagon), I will
vote willowsweep
He presents us with reasoning he declares as false later, and votes for willows_weep. I have no idea why, really. Why him? Because he didn't jump on the bandwagon to lynch a townie?
I agree we should not rush the day. Yesterday we got lucky because one of the insuffiient posters turned out to be scum.
No comment.
3 on Page 7
unvote Willowsweep
I agree with Tigris - his recent posts simply do not smell of mafia. And if he is one, he deserves a compliment for that.
I need to re-read the thread.
He 'agrees' once more.
I have reread the thread. No clear insights, but plenty of gut feelings.
Note that scum Leonidas had made six posts:
Leo wrote:
vote: Spoon - 'cause there is no spoon... (random)
Leo wrote:
Sorry - late in this game too. Reading the thread.
Leo wrote:
Thanks for unvoting me, No Idea.
vote: no Idea - everything that has been said so far.
Leo wrote:
unvote: Spoon
Leo wrote:
vote: Darkblade
Leo wrote:
I know how tempting it is to refrain from posting in this game.
(It appears that stupidity is going to prevent us from ever reaching night 2 anyway).
The remaining scum might very well have interpreted that these posts were sufficient. This means that my initial reaction on the likely innocence of Tigris and Spoon is out of the window.
I can't exactly put my finger on it why, but gslamm's posts (and to a lesser extent Spoon) make me most inclined to think he's mafia.
Vote gslamm
Make that five posts, as I screwed up the copy/paste and quote inserts.
His last post was
vote: Darkblade
I know how tempting it is to refrain from posting in this game.
(It appears that stupidity is going to prevent us from ever reaching night 2 anyway).
However - Darkblade is really abusing the priviledge. And his name is still on the list of active players on page 1.
Instead of the two posts I made out of it. The point remains the same though.
He delcares his previous reasoning as false, and then decides to vote gslamm because 'his posts make him inclined to think he is mafia'.
unvote gslamm, vote Spoon
I'd like to see a bit more participation and a little more commitment from you than "no vote for now".
Apparently, now gslamm isn't very suspicious anymore, and making the non-posters post is more important. I was barely posting that little, and I wonder why you chose me. However, even weirder is that you suddently don't go after gslamm anymore and jump on me.
And two more on page 8
unvote Spoon
At least you're talking now. Which reminds me...
Stewie wrote:
Oh, me not posting here has nothing to do with this game, I haven't been posting in mafiascum too much on the last 3 days.
Anyways, I really have no suspicions right now, other than WW, but nobody seems to think so too, so I guess that the whole town+1 mafia can't be wrong.
Nope. Far too non-committing for my taste.
vote Stewie
Now that I have actually posted, he jumps on to the next non-poster.
Now, the final post:
I'm actually quite happy with your latest reaction. It smells fishy. Very fishy. I'm pretty sure that either you or Stewie is the remaining scum.
I have no idea why me being suspicious of you for reasons that seem legitimate to me is 'fishy'. If I actually were mafia, there would be no reason for me to go accuse a player I know as experienced of being mafia, while I can just as well hide out in the dark, waiting for the town to lynch the next innocent.
However, Stewie's post also strikes me as somewhat suspicious. You are very fast to follow DP against me.
