Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)


User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1825 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:49 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 1550, IV Vexen wrote:Alright. Time for the reveal.

I'm both a protective role, and an investigative. I'm probably not going to die tonight, so if there's another protective they shouldn't target me tonight, but I'm almost certainly biting the bullet tomorrow night.

Every night I target someone, and all actions taken against that target fail. If I target someone for the second night in a row, I'm told that person's alignment.

Now you know why I had literally 0 doubts I wasn't getting lynched today.
My big theory post at Xemnas is still relevant too, but should be delayed due to the obvscum lynch tomorrow.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1826 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:50 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1823, X Luxord wrote:Lol.
"Huge difference."
The quote is literally the definition of rolestopper.
Ahahahaha
Yes it is now if you don't mind I am trying to figure out something fishy if you don't mind I am trying to scumhunt here and actually giving credence to what you're saying could you not be difficult about it?
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
X Luxord
X Luxord
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
X Luxord
Goon
Goon
Posts: 338
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1827 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:52 am

Post by X Luxord »

Sure thing
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1828 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:54 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 0, Heartless wrote:Xemnas (Replaced once)- IC
Xigbar- Informed Infinite Commuter/ Most of the power remaining in town role that he refused to elaborate on and tacked on 6 pages later.
Xaldin- Tracker w/ 4 targets N1, 3 N2, etc.
Vexen (Replaced once)- ^
Lexaeus- Protective of somekind with an additional bit of role
Zexion- Unclaimed
Saïx- Bomb/1 shot vig, either but not both
Axel- Stopped N1 made everyone hated D2, proven
Demyx (Replaced once)- Softed investigative, specifically tracker, which is worth considering
Luxord (Replaced two times)- Neighborhood that makes people hated
Marluxia- unclaimed
Larxene (Replaced once)- Flipped investigative immune Roleblocker
Roxas- Proven roleblocker, claimed infinite shot BP.
There, from memory. Not gonna find links to individual claims, but Demy's soft was immediately after Xal's claim. He asked if him being a tracker would change my desire to get results before lynching Xal, and I berated him over the soft.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1829 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:56 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1828, IV Vexen wrote:
In post 0, Heartless wrote:Xemnas (Replaced once)- IC
Xigbar- Informed Infinite Commuter/ Most of the power remaining in town role that he refused to elaborate on and tacked on 6 pages later.
Xaldin- Tracker w/ 4 targets N1, 3 N2, etc.
Vexen (Replaced once)- ^
Lexaeus- Protective of somekind with an additional bit of role
Zexion- Unclaimed
Saïx- Bomb/1 shot vig, either but not both
Axel- Stopped N1 made everyone hated D2, proven
Demyx (Replaced once)- Softed investigative, specifically tracker, which is worth considering
Luxord (Replaced two times)- Neighborhood that makes people hated
Marluxia- unclaimed
Larxene (Replaced once)- Flipped investigative immune Roleblocker
Roxas- Proven roleblocker, claimed infinite shot BP.
There, from memory. Not gonna find links to individual claims, but Demy's soft was immediately after Xal's claim. He asked if him being a tracker would change my desire to get results before lynching Xal, and I berated him over the soft.
Where was the hood openly stated hated?

I said neg util but not hated?
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1830 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:57 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 1821, V Lexaeus wrote:
In post 1818, IV Vexen wrote:
In post 1816, V Lexaeus wrote:@Vexen you claimed doc?? Where?
Not outright doc, but it's functionally my role. Link momentarily, but I roleblock everyone who targets my target, including NK's. If I target them twice I cop them.
Why do you think Town would have two roleblockers?
Because there's a flipped town roleblocker.

Regardless of which one of me/Xig is town there's two roleblockers. His is reflexive, mine is everyone else who targets a player. Anyway you slice it, there's a lot of town power here which probably means a lot of scum power.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1831 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:57 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 722, X Luxord wrote:I don't think it should if you scumread my slot regardless if I claimed Cop/IC you should vote my slot.

I'm a neighborzier each day I pick someone to invite to a game that we play in the neighborhood the winner will be loved the next day while the loser is hated.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1832 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:57 am

Post by IV Vexen »

Didn't specify whom he was targeting, but this was D1, iirc.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1833 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:58 am

Post by IV Vexen »

Roxas is doublevoter, not roleblocker. Sorry, typod there.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1834 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:07 am

Post by IV Vexen »

Oh, btw, clarified this with anti pretty much immediately after I replaced in. If someone with a role like mine were to target someone who is investigation immune, only the cop function would fail. The two actions resolve separately.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1835 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:08 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

@Saix How would a doctor interact with your Bomb? The wiki says to ask the mod.

@Vexen -- Hypothetically, assume day ended this second: Would you be on the IC or another player with all the protectives that are claimed?
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1836 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:09 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

Don't say who obviously if someone else.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1837 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:10 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

Be back in 30 but with all the claims mass claim is hella in order at this point.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1838 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:17 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 1835, V Lexaeus wrote:@Saix How would a doctor interact with your Bomb? The wiki says to ask the mod.

@Vexen -- Hypothetically, assume day ended this second: Would you be on the IC or another player with all the protectives that are claimed?
His bomb is only for NKs.

I'd target one of you, Xem, Rox. I really want a cop result on Rox, because he's perfectly emulating or is one of the people who I believe can completely outplay me as scum. I would be using an rng pattern to choose between the three to disincentivise scum killing either you or Xem.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1839 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:19 am

Post by IV Vexen »

I asked a fruit vendor or other relatively useless targetting role to confirm Saix not killing power when targeted, btw, because he clarified to bomb from PGO, and I cannot see town PGO playing the way he has.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1840 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:22 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1838, IV Vexen wrote:
In post 1835, V Lexaeus wrote:@Saix How would a doctor interact with your Bomb? The wiki says to ask the mod.

@Vexen -- Hypothetically, assume day ended this second: Would you be on the IC or another player with all the protectives that are claimed?
His bomb is only for NKs.

I'd target one of you, Xem, Rox. I really want a cop result on Rox, because he's perfectly emulating or is one of the people who I believe can completely outplay me as scum. I would be using an rng pattern to choose between the three to disincentivise scum killing either you or Xem.
Correct. The wiki states to ask the mod what happens if a Bomb is killed doc heals Bomb. I am asking Saix about that scenario.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1841 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:23 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 1837, V Lexaeus wrote:Be back in 30 but with all the claims mass claim is hella in order at this point.
Not today. Too little time to discuss and reason it out.

Not tomorrow either, unless we lynch Xig today, because it won't effect the correct decision of lynch Xig, and just gives scum a chance to play around anything town that comes out.

But yeah. Full massclaim, as described in my big theory post to Xemnas earlier today is in the near future.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1842 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:23 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1839, IV Vexen wrote:I asked a fruit vendor or other relatively useless targetting role to confirm Saix not killing power when targeted, btw, because he clarified to bomb from PGO, and I cannot see town PGO playing the way he has.
I can see a Town Bomb claiming PGO. It discentivizes town PR deaths and draws the NK as PGO is faked by PRs. It is a site meta.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1843 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:23 am

Post by IV Vexen »

I'm saying he's already answered. He kills anyone who attempts to kill him. The kill still succeeds.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1844 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:24 am

Post by IV Vexen »

Yeah, but claiming PGO then switching to Bomb is most certainly something scum PGO would do, and I'm not discounting that option given the amount of power town has.

If a fruit vendor dies tonight, Saix is confscum.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1845 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:25 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1844, IV Vexen wrote:Yeah, but claiming PGO then switching to Bomb is most certainly something scum PGO would do, and I'm not discounting that option given the amount of power town has.

If a fruit vendor dies tonight, Saix is confscum.
No Saix is confTown.

Reasons.

You'll see when I die.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1846 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:26 am

Post by IV Vexen »

In post 1508, VII Saix wrote:If someone targets me at night, they will be killed automatically.
I can kill someone at night, but if I choose to do so, I will forfeit the first ability.
So, in effect, I have only one functional power but been given the option to choose out of the two.

Lynching is the only likely way I will be shown the door, unless the scum can afford to reduce by 1. I can go to the endgame if people believe me.
In post 1509, VII Saix wrote:*If someone targets me at night for a nightkill
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
IV Vexen
IV Vexen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
IV Vexen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 227
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1847 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:28 am

Post by IV Vexen »

If a fruit vendor dies tonight, Saix is confscum. If he's conftown, that won't happen. If there is a fruit vendor and they DON'T die, that's good evidence for Saix town that doesn't rely on your role or you being town.

It's just correct play. If you are a fruit vendor or similarly useless night action, target Saix.
The Chilly Academic
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1848 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:28 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1846, IV Vexen wrote:
In post 1508, VII Saix wrote:If someone targets me at night, they will be killed automatically.
I can kill someone at night, but if I choose to do so, I will forfeit the first ability.
So, in effect, I have only one functional power but been given the option to choose out of the two.

Lynching is the only likely way I will be shown the door, unless the scum can afford to reduce by 1. I can go to the endgame if people believe me.
In post 1509, VII Saix wrote:*If someone targets me at night for a nightkill
Would you stop spamming the thread already?

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Bomb

Last sentence Variations is what I want to know.
The Taciturn Stalwart
User avatar
V Lexaeus
V Lexaeus
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
V Lexaeus
Goon
Goon
Posts: 175
Joined: July 20, 2017

Post Post #1849 (ISO) » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:30 am

Post by V Lexaeus »

In post 1847, IV Vexen wrote:If a fruit vendor dies tonight, Saix is confscum. If he's conftown, that won't happen. If there is a fruit vendor and they DON'T die, that's good evidence for Saix town that doesn't rely on your role or you being town.

It's just correct play. If you are a fruit vendor or similarly useless night action, target Saix.
A) There is no claimed fruit vendor.
B) I am telling you Saix is confirmed Town.
C) This setup looks to be designed in such a way that confirming yourself via role is useless.
The Taciturn Stalwart

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”