Mini 599: Rwandan Genocide - Game Over

[chaotic_diablo]

I'm general. I still have my NK.

[roffman]

i'm satisfied unless someone counterclaims one of the four roles.

vote voodoo

[TBuG]

k.

Vote: Voodo

[Voodo]

i'm satisfied unless someone counterclaims one of the four roles.

vote voodoo

INVALID VOTE!!! It's "Voodo"!

*Last-ditch effort to stay alive*

[dahill1]

I'm general. I still have my NK.

unless someone disagrees, i say kill Grimmy if Voodo comes up as Tutsi

[roffman]

ok then,

unvote vote voodo

[SleepyPanda]

I'm general. I still have my NK.

unless someone disagrees, i say kill Grimmy if Voodo comes up as Tutsi

I disagree.

There's no reason for him to waste his NK when we can just lynch him D3.

[dahill1]

i'm still confused as to how armlx died twice in a row
you make a good point about lynching him though. i forgot that unless c_d is lying, then the tutsi leader already used his kill

[SleepyPanda]

Zombie? o.o

[Natirasha]

Um...I'm a Hutu?

No, seriously, I am.

Expected.

Vote: Voodo

, if it still matters.

[Grimmy]

I'm general. I still have my NK.

unless someone disagrees, i say kill Grimmy if Voodo comes up as Tutsi

I disagree. for what it is worth.
My message gave us a 1 in 4 shot at finding scum. It made it easier for Panda to narrow it down to one choice. The odds are slightly in his favor, and puts me in the position of getting lynched the next day. This is EXACTLY why I claimed when I did, to try to avoid this.

[SleepyPanda]

That's only 25% chance to guess correctly. That's a pretty low chance to get it correct. Why are you so afraid of dying when the gameplan is pretty much already laid out, in favor of town?

What do you mean that's the reason why you claimed when you did? We have all already agreed that whoever got the result would come out. So was there a chance you weren't going to claim, for your own benefit? Also, I assume when saying claim, you're talking about the rally result.

[SleepyPanda]

Besides, it seems like you're pretty certain that Voodo is going to turn up Tutsi. You're already defending yourself for if he comes up guilty before it even happens.

[TDC]

No idea what you mean.
Are you saying that Panda is Tutsi together with Voodo?
If so, where's the problem?
We lynch Voodo, turns up Tutsi. We lynch you, you turn up Hutu. Then we lynch Panda. That would be 2 Tutsi for 1 Hutu.
Only one of you guys can have received the result, so the other must be Tutsi.

[TDC]

EBWOP: The above was referring to Grimmy.

[ShadowLurker]

Vote Count

Voodo

(5) - dahill1, TDC, Natirasha, roffman, PBuG

Not Voting

(6) - pickemgenius, Grimmy, zu_Faul, SleepyPanda, Voodo, chaotic_diablo

With 11 alive, it is 6 to lynch!

Prodding zu_faul

[SleepyPanda]

Hurr? I think like 7 people have their vote on Voodo. My vote is on him too.

[SleepyPanda]

Oh, exactly 6. Natirasha voted twice for him twice. XD

[SleepyPanda]

Hum, how about this?

Unvote

Vote: Voodo

[roffman]

i propose that if voodo comes up tutsi, we just lynch the non-power roles in alphabetical order, as it would gives us the best chance and fastest chance of success. If he comes up hutsi, we all get a meal of panda meat.

[SleepyPanda]

i propose that if voodo comes up tutsi, we just lynch the non-power roles in alphabetical order, as it would gives us the best chance and fastest chance of success. If he comes up hutsi, we all get a meal of panda meat.

Haha, that doesn't even make sense though. How does lynching that way increase chances of hitting Tutsi? By going alphabetical order, I'll be like, 2nd to last of being lynched. And also grimmy would be the first one to go anyways. ;P

[roffman]

alphabetical would give a more or less random distribution, plus ppl wouldn't have a chance to sway ppl with arguments. since if voodo is tutsi, hutsi has more or less won, this would just make the game go quicker.

[dahill1]

how about we lynch by rereading voodo and not randomly?

[SleepyPanda]

He pratically confessed and he had 6 votes on him since Sunday. He shouldn't even be alive and the thread should already be into night.

[roffman]

how about we lynch by rereading voodo and not randomly?

no