In post 1998, MathBlade wrote: In post 1910, boring wrote:I'm not sure about Titus yet. I'm not sure about Dunnstral yet. I'm not sure about Mathblade yet.
I can't help but think that if Hapahauli was dead wrong about everyone, scum would have kept him alive to make more wrong, but convincing cases.
VOTE: TheFuzzylogic99
Of the people yesterday who were okay with lynching Fuzzy, Hapa was by far the towniest and most convincing.
Example: You haven't provided a single concrete read yet are hypothesizing about what scum would do.
How is that scummy? It's the only way I know how to solve things. Take three people with the same role and they'll do three different things. Because nearly all actions, opinions, and votes can be reduced to "NAI". Motive that holds the key to someone's alignment. So it's motive that I try to bore down to. I won't pretend I'm great at it, but I've done alright for myself from time to time.
As for concrete reads, I've tried to be transparent this game about my thought process, in the hopes of inviting some kind of conversation with players. That is, when I'm not doing something that's hindered by transparency. Either way, I'm a collaborative thinker. It's how I "town". You, of course, see fit to shut it down with responses like:
Which is counter-productive at best. Why bother to answer at all, except to discourage conversation? Town is dying of apathy, and this kind of response is not helping.
