Mini 1945 | 13 Reasons Why ► — Game Over

WhyMafia · Post Post #2000 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:13 am

I'm a templar and LUV is a monk
I haven't watched the movie so Idk what that means

WhyMafia · Post Post #2001 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:14 am

And I think the dating part is enough to qualify as masons. Gerry is resorting to flavor to convince people

gerryoat · Post Post #2002 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:15 am

im just explaining the flavor lol

WhyMafia · Post Post #2003 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:16 am

In post 1998, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1996, Titus wrote:
In post 1992, WhyMafia wrote:Justin and Jessica
Summary of flavor?
in the show justin and jessica dated before the whole tape thing. but later on jessica hates justin. no way they are mason

But you're justifying that as how we are scum?

gerryoat · Post Post #2004 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:16 am

In post 1999, Titus wrote:
In post 1997, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1995, Titus wrote:
In post 1991, gerryoat wrote:please lynch the guilty
Gerry, answer my questions.

Do you think the person Fuzzy protected is conftown or scum shot at Fuzzy directly?
scum shot him directly
How did you reach that conclusion?

well if you or wheme were mafia, you woulda just hammered me. so chick/LUV/Why are the team

WhyMafia · Post Post #2005 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:17 am

So that's a blatant lie lol

gerryoat · Post Post #2006 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:17 am

No? you are confirmed to me. so i'm just explaining

WhyMafia · Post Post #2007 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:17 am

But how does that answer if scum shot TFL directly?

WhyMafia · Post Post #2008 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:19 am

In post 2006, gerryoat wrote:No? you are confirmed to me. so i'm just explaining

But you need to convince others. And you just said you were using it to explain. Your "guilty" has no weight whatsoever. Your job is supposed to convince them that LUV and I are scum
You haven't been stating anything scummy about us

Titus · Post Post #2009 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:22 am

In post 2004, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1999, Titus wrote:
In post 1997, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1995, Titus wrote:
In post 1991, gerryoat wrote:please lynch the guilty
Gerry, answer my questions.

Do you think the person Fuzzy protected is conftown or scum shot at Fuzzy directly?
scum shot him directly
How did you reach that conclusion?
well if you or wheme were mafia, you woulda just hammered me. so chick/LUV/Why are the team

I'm inclined to agree with WhyMafia.

I've stated TFL did not protect a mason. So why do you think TFL shot directly.

Titus · Post Post #2010 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:21 am

Ok, time for Madam Hardass.

Gerryoat, if you do not have a satisfactory answer in 48 hours, I'm voting you.

WhemeStar · Post Post #2011 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:57 am

alright reading now

WhemeStar · Post Post #2012 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:08 pm

I'm confused honestly
whymafia and luv are masons - i would expect 2 masons to be dead by now i don't see how masons live this long,
but
gerryoat claimed guilty on whymafia - This is obviously something scum can easily do in this situation
i don't want to blindly sheep like chick did cause if i vote wrong we lose.

gerryoat · Post Post #2013 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:14 pm

In post 2009, Titus wrote:
In post 2004, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1999, Titus wrote:
In post 1997, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1995, Titus wrote:
In post 1991, gerryoat wrote:please lynch the guilty
Gerry, answer my questions.

Do you think the person Fuzzy protected is conftown or scum shot at Fuzzy directly?
scum shot him directly
How did you reach that conclusion?
well if you or wheme were mafia, you woulda just hammered me. so chick/LUV/Why are the team
I'm inclined to agree with WhyMafia.

I've stated TFL did not protect a mason. So why do you think TFL shot directly.

why do i think scum shot TFL? who else would they shoot? is that your question?

gerryoat · Post Post #2014 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:15 pm

In post 2012, WhemeStar wrote:I'm confused honestly
whymafia and luv are masons - i would expect 2 masons to be dead by now i don't see how masons live this long,
but
gerryoat claimed guilty on whymafia - This is obviously something scum can easily do in this situation
i don't want to blindly sheep like chick did cause if i vote wrong we lose.

i have no reason to fake a guilty, i've never done a gambit on this site as mafia. i wasn't even scumread much

WhyMafia · Post Post #2015 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:23 pm

In post 2014, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2012, WhemeStar wrote:I'm confused honestly
whymafia and luv are masons - i would expect 2 masons to be dead by now i don't see how masons live this long,
but
gerryoat claimed guilty on whymafia - This is obviously something scum can easily do in this situation
i don't want to blindly sheep like chick did cause if i vote wrong we lose.
i have no reason to fake a guilty, i've never done a gambit on this site as mafia. i wasn't even scumread much

"I have no reason to fake a guilty" ... maybe to get a win?
"I've never done a gambit as mafia" ... ok nice self-meta that is completely manipulatable
"I wasn't even scumread much" ... which is maybe why scum chose you to do this?

WhyMafia · Post Post #2016 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:26 pm

In post 2012, WhemeStar wrote:I'm confused honestly
whymafia and luv are masons - i would expect 2 masons to be dead by now i don't see how masons live this long,
but
gerryoat claimed guilty on whymafia - This is obviously something scum can easily do in this situation
i don't want to blindly sheep like chick did cause if i vote wrong we lose.

We claimed like 2 days phases ago if my memory serves me correctly. Apparently Penguin blatantly softed vig (her tape said so) so that explains one NK. After that, we were already under suspicion, so it works to scum's favor to WIFOM it. And it's entirely plausible that LUV or I was the NK due to Fuzzy's role

Titus · Post Post #2017 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:28 pm

In post 2013, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2009, Titus wrote:
In post 2004, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1999, Titus wrote:
In post 1997, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1995, Titus wrote:
In post 1991, gerryoat wrote:please lynch the guilty
Gerry, answer my questions.

Do you think the person Fuzzy protected is conftown or scum shot at Fuzzy directly?
scum shot him directly
How did you reach that conclusion?
well if you or wheme were mafia, you woulda just hammered me. so chick/LUV/Why are the team
I'm inclined to agree with WhyMafia.

I've stated TFL did not protect a mason. So why do you think TFL shot directly.
why do i think scum shot TFL? who else would they shoot? is that your question?

Yes. TFL is a bodyguard. He could have died protecting his protectee. Why do you not think that happened?

Titus · Post Post #2018 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:49 pm

In post 2016, WhyMafia wrote:
In post 2012, WhemeStar wrote:I'm confused honestly
whymafia and luv are masons - i would expect 2 masons to be dead by now i don't see how masons live this long,
but
gerryoat claimed guilty on whymafia - This is obviously something scum can easily do in this situation
i don't want to blindly sheep like chick did cause if i vote wrong we lose.
We claimed like 2 days phases ago if my memory serves me correctly. Apparently Penguin blatantly softed vig (her tape said so) so that explains one NK. After that, we were already under suspicion, so it works to scum's favor to WIFOM it. And it's entirely plausible that LUV or I was the NK due to Fuzzy's role

The last part is not true. I have Fuzzy's tape. You are not the person Fuzzy protected.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #2019 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:00 pm

Then he did protected Chick.

WhyMafia · Post Post #2020 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:09 pm

In post 2016, WhyMafia wrote:it's entirely plausible that LUV or I was the NK due to Fuzzy's role

I never said it was a guarantee. I said it was plausible

Titus · Post Post #2021 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:35 pm

In post 2019, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Then he did protected Chick.

Why did you say that?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #2022 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:37 pm

Best kill not us from my POV.

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #2023 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:38 pm

That should read “he protected Chick” lol

gerryoat · Post Post #2024 (ISO) » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:00 pm

In post 2017, Titus wrote:
In post 2013, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2009, Titus wrote:
In post 2004, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1999, Titus wrote:
In post 1997, gerryoat wrote:
In post 1995, Titus wrote:
In post 1991, gerryoat wrote:please lynch the guilty
Gerry, answer my questions.

Do you think the person Fuzzy protected is conftown or scum shot at Fuzzy directly?
scum shot him directly
How did you reach that conclusion?
well if you or wheme were mafia, you woulda just hammered me. so chick/LUV/Why are the team
I'm inclined to agree with WhyMafia.

I've stated TFL did not protect a mason. So why do you think TFL shot directly.
why do i think scum shot TFL? who else would they shoot? is that your question?
Yes. TFL is a bodyguard. He could have died protecting his protectee. Why do you not think that happened?

because i think the masons realized that they could push a mislynch easier if he was dead