Open 421-Pamplona II: Electric Bullgaloo! Game over

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2175 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:38 pm

What Near did was nothing more than play paper-scissors-rock with your friend: If you lose protect XXX, If you win protect YYY.
Was that not the point, Near?

Near · Post Post #2176 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:39 pm

But all the information was publicly available to every single player in this game.

Again, I am not complaining at all. I can understand mod replacing a player who did something weird. But I do want to know the rules. Curiosity and I don't want to make the same mistake.

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2177 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:40 pm

I think the PRs were just more than excited to share their roles that they blindly claimed.
Inte's thing was really really dumb.
DJD hid behind Rach, no?

Bitmap · Post Post #2178 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:40 pm

Hey, I liked getting Inte lynched. It prevented me from getting lynched on Day 1.

Near · Post Post #2179 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:42 pm

DMS, basically what I did was post a bunch of random links. One of the link was to the online clock.

The seconds on the online clock was basically going to determine who protects who.

You can only get to the link if you answered my question. And the question was about a football player I thought Trevor was familiar with. So he could instantly click on the clock.

I would also click on the clock link after I submitted the question, so I knew what seconds he would see on his end.

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2180 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:43 pm

Near · Post Post #2181 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:43 pm

Of course a scum could also instantly click on all of the links, but unless scums figured out my intention, I thought it would have been unlikely for them to do so. Especially since I made up: "you only get one chance to answer the question"

Bitmap · Post Post #2182 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:43 pm

Why did Uber quit though? Did he just rage?

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2183 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:44 pm

Hahahahaha. That's pretty funny.

Near · Post Post #2184 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:45 pm

Bitmap, you did claim Strongman kill... did you not?

WHy did town go along with your plan...

Also, I protected BK on the night before scums claimed... If you didn't claim Strongman, I would have known it anyway.

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2185 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:46 pm

Funny how the retired Docs are talking in celebratory tone.

Near · Post Post #2186 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:48 pm

And to be honest, I intentionally picked the time so that Trevor would protect me and I "supposedly" would protect Bit.

Of course, my plan was to protect Trevor. So, basically we would protect each other.

I thought scums would target one of the doctors for sure, counting on the fact that we can't communicate and that the accepted plan was Trevor -> Near -> BK protection.

Bitmap · Post Post #2187 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:49 pm

Yes, I did claim Strongman/Ninja kills. Trev and Kunk probably didn't read enough to realize that and just thought I couldn't do anything.

Actually, there's a reason I picked Strongman/Ninja kills instead of 1 shot bulletproof. BP is more useful against warding off scum. Strongman kills are more useful against warding off town.

Derp.

Bitmap · Post Post #2188 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:49 pm

In post 2185, drmyshotgun wrote:Funny how the retired Docs are talking in celebratory tone.

Yo, I'm a doc. I played till the very end.

Near · Post Post #2189 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:50 pm

In post 2185, drmyshotgun wrote:Funny how the retired Docs are talking in celebratory tone.

It's because we did our job well protecting this one human being, even if he turned out to be a Bit scum.

drmyshotgun · Post Post #2190 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:50 pm

Yeah. I knew 3 Docs 1 JK was stretching the credibility with the percentage chances of picking this particular combination.
That's pretty smart thing Near.

Bitmap wrote:
In post 2185, drmyshotgun wrote:Funny how the retired Docs are talking in celebratory tone.

Yo, I'm a doc. I played till the very end.

No you are not! You can't be in our Docs-only-club!

Bitmap · Post Post #2191 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:52 pm

Oh, if you are curious,

Day 1: Kill McStab
Day 2: Sleep
Day 3: Kill BK201
Day 4: Kill RBD
Day 5: Sleep

Near · Post Post #2192 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:53 pm

BTW, the most epic post I have ever seen.... DMS, your proposal to lynch your balls!!

Bitmap · Post Post #2193 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:53 pm

In post 2192, Near wrote:BTW, the most epic post I have ever seen.... DMS, your proposal to lynch your balls!!

Oh shit, my sides hurt so much when you said that.

McStab · Post Post #2194 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:55 pm

To be honest, I wasn't in the game long, but I felt my number one mistake was claiming Role Cop. Obviously fakeclaiming as town isn't a smart play generally, but do you think in this specific condition it would've been smart?

McStab · Post Post #2195 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:55 pm

To be honest, I wasn't in the game long, but I felt my number one mistake was claiming Role Cop. Obviously fakeclaiming as town isn't a smart play generally, but do you think in this specific condition it would've been smart?

Bitmap · Post Post #2196 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:57 pm

McStab, can you post the Dead QT PLEASE!?!?!

And there was no helping it since you claimed T1.

McStab · Post Post #2197 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:09 pm

http://www.quicktopic.com/48/H/KAp2SCaymuT

Bitmap · Post Post #2198 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:25 pm

Damn, that's a shit load of drama in that QT.

DoubleJD · Post Post #2199 (ISO) » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:47 pm

Grats bit, i only really skimmed the thread, but i mostly thought you were town (i had weird sk thoughts for abit, but got rid of them later).

I hid behind RBD, figuring to confirm a very active townie that wouldnt be nk'd becasue of 7 pr claims...or confirm as scum. Props to DMS for nailing my target.

I still dont understand why we fake claimed day1. Day 2 i was fine with, i prefered day 3, but just ahhhhh

Also WP rbd