Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Tasky]

STOP DISCUSSING AND VOTE NO LYNCH NOW.
it is the only logical move and the more discussion is going on, the more info scum has for their NK

[Nobody Special]

Votecount 3.01

No Lynch - 2 - Vi, Tasky

Not Voting: AurorusVox, chamber, pappums rat, Herodotus, RayFrost, The Fonz



Deadline is January 5.

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

[Vi]

Actually, rethinking what I said earlier.

Unvote: No Lynch

[Vi]

Lynch is pref. with killing/prot. roles.
Info roles can be at advantage w/NL but extra Night may not be worth risk.

[Vi]

No obvkill may just be from my perspective.

---

MC, then. Ready whenever.

[AurorusVox]

How do we start? (I'm an MC virgin)

[Vi]

I hate organizing MCs and would rather just get them over with, so I may not be the best person to answer.

General idea is claiming in reverse order of popular suspicion.

[Tasky]

wait, can you please explain what we gain from lynching today?
it is quite unlikely there is a NK beside scum

[Tasky]

@mod: do scum have to kill or can they choose not to kill?

[Vi]

If we have an info role, it's prob. better for them to claim Today.
Also whoever they kill at Night will be in their own interest, with our gains questionable.

[Tasky]

huh? if we have an info role, isn't it be better to no lynch once before outing them, so they have one more investigation?
please rephrase "also whoever..."

[Vi]

*Only if they don't die overNight.
*Scum-directed kills generally don't help Town.

[Herodotus]

getting on odds via night action after MC basically depends on scum not having a RB
leaning toward NL

[The Fonz]

Protect roles don't benefit from NL, killing roles can't risk it. Only investigators.

[The Fonz]

If there exists one or more investigator, then value of poss. info has to be weighed against risk of them dying without claiming what they already have.

[The Fonz]

Also whoever: The scum will only kill if they think it helps them. Whoever dies will be the person whose death helps scum most.

[Tasky]

a protective role already died, killing role seems unlikely since there was only one kill/night. investigation however is quite likely in some form.

[The Fonz]

Right. But the chance of a tracker or watcher hitting are very low. If there is a cop, then it's better to get results out now- hell, assuming the existence of a cop...

[The Fonz]

it's best to get results out, then NL, scum then either have to kill cop and hence confirm, or let cop live to get another investigation in.

[The Fonz]

It's just a really small benefit vs letting the scum get rid of the player they think most likely to be onto them.

[The Fonz]

The town's in a bad spot, but at least 3/4 of the dead were VTs. This means, if we're facing 9-3, there's likely to be quite a lot of power out there.

[The Fonz]

Ergo, whoever scum shoots is quite likely to be power, plus whatever the flip more info makes it easier for scum to fakeclaim.

[Tasky]

so you are suggesting massclaim first and then NL anyway? wouldn't that give scum a really good night where they can kill EXACTLY who they need to kill?

[The Fonz]

No. I'm suggesting massclaim, then NL

if and only if

there is a cop claim. Otherwise, lynch.

[The Fonz]

If there's not a cop, then the negatives of NL outweigh the positives at any point.