Newbie 1021: Game over

[Vae Victus]

I'm not sure I buy Sternum's play, here. There's a strong part of me that suspects that she's faking. I mean, not knowing how to unvote?

[Zed]

Yep, you can unvote. There is an unvote tag you can click when you go to "reply" and not just the quick reply

unvote

or you can do it with the bold tags

[foilist13]

These is a newbie game. Most people read a game before they start, but there's no requirement for that. It's doesn't surprise me that at least one person doesn't know (besides I've seen people ask about unvoting before).

[nepsy]

In any case, Sternum (and anyone else completely new) it's useful if you take a look at the rules in the first posts of this thread (Where you can see how you can unvote for example) and take a look at a couple games to see how this works.

[Cnor]

i'm gonna

Vote: Sternum

for jumping onto a bandwagon on me.

[nepsy]

unvote

So you are voting him just because he voted for you? If he would jump into anyone else's bandwagon you would be ok?
Because that's exactly what you're doing now.

[Ardelia Lortz]

No, we do not want a lynch anytime soon. Placing the "x"th vote is a common reason for the first serious wagon of the Day.

so when DO we want to kill someone?

[foilist13]

When I know you'll know. It may take a while though.

unvote, vote: crilly

[Sotty7]

2nd vote count of day one

Cnor: 2 (Crilly, Sternum)
Sternum: 2 (Vae Victus, Cnor)

foilist13: 1 (Ardelia Lortz)
Crilly: 1 (foilist13)

Not voting: 2 (Szkander, nepsy, Zed)

• With
  9
  alive, it takes
  5
  to lynch
  
• The deadline for the end of day one is Wednesday, November 3rd at 7am CST
  
• Szkander
  is being replaced.

[Vae Victus]

No, we do not want a lynch anytime soon. Placing the "x"th vote is a common reason for the first serious wagon of the Day.

so when DO we want to kill someone?

When we become convinced that one player is the best lynch, I think. Right now, we don't really know enough to lynch any more than semi-randomly, I think. Why are you so eager to see somebody killed in advance of discussion on the subject?

[nepsy]

Foilist, why the vote for Crilly? Semi random or it has some reason behind it?

[Sotty7]

Crilly

has been prodded

[Sotty7]

Abelcain

replaces Szkander. Welcome them!

[Abelcain]

I'm gonna have to VOTE: Ardelia. Her first post (and subsequent EBWOP) made a wild assumption that seemed a little too wild to be realistic, and her second post seemed far too eager to end the day early with a lynch.

[foilist13]

Mine is a serious vote. I was hoping to get a reaction out of him before explaining it, but you asked and he doesn't seem to be here. Rereadhis first postvery carefully and ask yourself if it looks like the mindset of a townie. If you still don't see it I'll explain further.

[Crilly]

Yes. Just say UNVOTE: X

Speaking of it, and to avoid lynching a player who is going to be replaced shortly,

UNVOTE: CNOR

[Crilly]

Ah whoops, still gonna unvote, didn't see the second page *fail*

[foilist13]

You lack of response to a serious vote against you is disturbing

[Zed]

I have no idea why you guys are voting randomly without any thought, but eh. I'll
VOTE: CNOR

Not because ZED is SE, but because I think his vote is actually random. Also, he hasn't defended himself yet, so, yeah.

I think this is weird... This was post 13, Cnor hadn't posted yet. How can you vote for someone because they didn't defend themself, when they haven't even posted yet?

[Sotty7]

Sternum

has been prodded

[Abelcain]

I have no idea why you guys are voting randomly without any thought, but eh. I'll
VOTE: CNOR

Not because ZED is SE, but because I think his vote is actually random. Also, he hasn't defended himself yet, so, yeah.

I think this is weird... This was post 13, Cnor hadn't posted yet. How can you vote for someone because they didn't defend themself, when they haven't even posted yet?

To be fair, I think Crilly was referring to you not defending yourself; in the post after your vote for Cnor, foilist voted you and gave the reason that he didn't think your vote was random.

If you ask me this makes Crilly even more suspicious. His reason for voting for the same person you did is because

your

vote was random? Why wouldn't he randomly vote for someone else then? Add this to his ignoring foilist's "serious vote", and I think Crilly needs to give everyone some answers.

Unvote; Vote Crilly

[Sternum]

unvote

[Zed]

Well if Crilly was referring to me not defending myself, then I probably didn't catch ti for two reasons. One, I'm a girl. Honest mistake guys Two, it doesn't really make sense for someone to vote with me if he thinks I'm suspicious. That just isn't... logical.

[nepsy]

I read it as Crilly was talking about Cnor not defending himself (even if he hadn't posted yet, so yeah, it was weird). If he was talking about Zed he would have voted her, or at least that would be the logical thing.

So I am going to stick with my vote, even tho I will still have less weight then the IC and SE.

I'm also not a big fan of this sentence, as long as people can think for themselves and make good arguments there's no reason one should follow more easily an IC or SE just because they played more games in this site.

[Sotty7]

3rd vote count of day one

Sternum: 2 (Vae Victus, Cnor)
Crilly: 2 (foilist13, Abelcain)

foilist13: 1 (Ardelia Lortz)

Not voting: 4 (nepsy, Zed, Crilly, Sternum)

• With
  9
  alive, it takes
  5
  to lynch
  
• The deadline for the end of day one is Wednesday, November 3rd at 7am CST
  
• Ardelia Lortz
  has been prodded
  
• Cnor
  has been prodded