Just to prevent MLF from hammering and saving his skin for another night, at least.
I didn't realise how close we were to lynch - perhaps that's why MLF didn't bold his vote?
Actually that's a good point. Until the mod posted that votecount I didn't realize that it only took 4 votes at the deadline to call it a lynch. Now that Knight has unvoted, my vote counts, though, so I'll leave it where it is.Actually at this stage your vote on Roff was useless you put the fith vote on someone who was going to be deadline lynched (4 votes) in a few more hours.
You do realize that the day is over in the next few hours even with your unvote?Knight of Cydonia wrote:unvote
Just to prevent MLF from hammering and saving his skin for another night, at least.
I didn't realise how close we were to lynch - perhaps that's why MLF didn't bold his vote?
This would have been hammer. It may only keep roffman going a few hours, but I intend to wait until deadline, and see if anything comes of this cocked-up hammer, rather than let MLF end all discussion.Sorry, School started for me.
Anyway, I'll Vote Roffman.
But I'll ask for a Vote count first so that we don't end the day before we need to.
I'm a one-shot vig. No paper.Rotten Snitch wrote:@ Roffman
It looks like unless we can get a complete change in votes in the next 9-10 hours you are today's lynch.
No reveal at death but you are allowed to claim pre-death. Even if we can't 100% believe you, we might get something out of you to help us tomorrow?
It would have been a hammer, yeah. If we hammer without asking, we might arrive to a lot of accidental town lynches. I can't understand the "reading comprehension" part.melikefood wrote:No, I was going to wait.
FomSBecause I have faith in your reading comprehension
Anyway, I'll Vote Roffman.
But I'll ask for a Vote count firstso that we don't end the day before we need to.
Paper wrote:There are two scum remaining. One is using a pile of crap to de
It is nowPaper wrote:Ythill was telling the truth about his role
clammy @ 182 wrote:I'm voting him for jumping as easy asshitonto the MLF wagon!
I don't have much after that...jayfin3 @ 223 wrote:Hey don't be mean. I had ashitload of stuff written up. It's not my fault the computer timed out.
That would mean according to the second paper that roffman was scum.Yosarian2 wrote:"There are two scum left" sounds incredibly specific; I wonder who would know that? Would that mean we've lynched a scum, or something?
I honestly don't believe that you missed this. It's far too convenient a hammer.MLF wrote: Should've read that Ythill voted himself. DX
thenMLF wrote: I think a lynch on Ythill would be fine.
Not sure how we'll go from that in no-reveal though.
Vote Ythill
then a little laterMLF wrote: I wasn't aware of him voting himself. D:
I was preparing a post and trying to decide what to say, and I decided to put a vote on to push a claim.
But I was too late and he claimed and voted himself.
Flip-flop extraordinare.MLF wrote: Based on Ythill's behavior, I'd say I am almost completely convinced that Ythill was Scum.
How would you say I'm attacking Ythill's credibility?
Oh look, you're OMGUSing me by linking crap to shit, and subtly attacking clammy, who was a pretty good lynch candidate at one point yesterday, AFAIR.MLF wrote: Anyway.. perhaps the word crap would mean using words related to crap?
clammy @ 182 wrote:
I'm voting him for jumping as easy as shit onto the MLF wagon!
jayfin3 @ 223 wrote:
Hey don't be mean. I had a shitload of stuff written up. It's not my fault the computer timed out.
I don't have much after that...